In favor of tobacco advertising ban: Being responsible for the welfare of its citizens, the Government of India (GOI) sought better to ban tobacco companies from advertising their products. It’s beneficial to ban such advertising because of teen smoking prevention. By promoting tobacco less or not at all, the adolescents were presumed to use the products less until they they no longer used them in the long run. Tobacco advertisements were instigating tobacco use in the teen population. In accordance to the case study the four countries (Finland, Norway, New Zealand and France) that had already banned tobacco advertising, it showed that tobacco consumption had effectively decreased within the adolescent population (Finland, by thirty-seven percent ( 37%); Norway, by twenty-six percent ( 26%), New Zealand, by twenty-one percent (21%), and France, by fourteen percent (14%)). Theses results would decrease the rates for those who get gum and heart diseases caused by tobacco.
Against tobacco advertising ban: Tobacco consumption is one’s free choice, specially adults. The advertising doesn’t have as great of an influence on adult’s as it would on teenagers. Even teenagers are old to distinguish the difference between good and bad. If they choose to smoke it though their own free will. The advertisement of tobacco doesn’t physically walk them to the store or the seller, nor grab their hands, put them in their pockets, pull out some cash and buy it for them. It’s all free will. Banning the advertisement of tobacco should mean banning the production of tobacco products as well. The companies insist that they are promoting brand choices and not smoking. Banning the advertising is absurd, hence that ...
... middle of paper ...
...lt for increase of smoking. As long as they keep making cigarettes and it’s legal for it to be sold and bought, then the advertising isn’t what a government should be worried about. Certainly, one can’t legally buy it in the U.S if they’re underaged, but it doesn’t mean that minors don’t smoke it. Therefore, since it’s one’s free will to buy and consume tobacco, it’s their responsibility to suffer the consequences. Banning the advertisements is stripping entertainment producers, actors, and television networks of profits. Even those who promote as non-smokers would be strip of those profits because they would have been on television promoting healthy lives away from cigarettes if it wasn’t for the manufacturing of cigarettes in the first place. Therefore, if they want to ban the advertisement of the products, the manufacturing of the product should be ceased as well.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Ban on Tobacco Ads by the Government of India An article titled: Ethics in Business was written between 1998 - 2001 and finally published in February 6, 2001. This article was written about a tobacco organization called India Tobacco Company (ITC) Philip Morris, found in India. 1. Arguments in favour of the ban on tobacco advertising in India Government, acting as the manager of the entire country has the responsibility to protect its citizens against any inappropriate behaviour. In 2001, India launches arguments in favour of the ban on tobacco advertising in the country.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco]
746 words (2.1 pages)
- Case Study analysis” Ban on Tobacco Ads by the Government of India”. All countries banned tobacco by imposing taxes or did certain procedures in order to limit its intake, like creating no smoking areas within restaurants and malls and some other public areas, also they banned its sales to whom are under 18 years old while explaining to the people by the ads its risks on its consumers’ health and how it can threaten their lives by the diseases that it can lead to and that can result in death. In India, and in February 2001, the government decided to ban the advertising tobacco in sports events in order to limit its intake within the adolescents and young generations and prepare to launch the... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, India, Advertising]
795 words (2.3 pages)
- Ethics in Regards to the Ban on Tobacco Ads by the Government of India In mid-2001, the Government of India (GOI) reported that it would table a bill banning tobacco organizations from promoting their items and supporting games and social occasions. The case 'Restriction on Tobacco Ads by the Government of India ' gave an outline of the issues that have been raised by this choice. The case brings to the fore both the moral and business measurements of such a boycott, which reviews the connection between cigarette publicizing and utilization.... [tags: Tobacco, Nicotine, Cigarette, Smoking]
1047 words (3 pages)
- Case Analysis Of Ban On Tobacco Ads By The Government Of India The tobacco industry is growing dramatically these days. While anti-tobacco education is provided, numerous projects are held and healthy life-style is promoted, smoking still remains popular among adolescent and adults. Even though this habit does not seem to be that big of a deal, tobacco users require medical and physiological help to quit. Tobacco smoking is still a growing problem in developing countries. Having checked the Tobacco Control Country Profiles of the United States America, Germany, India and Russia by World Health Organization (WHO), I can see that the developed countries are way stricter about smoking in public... [tags: Tobacco, Tobacco smoking, Smoking]
726 words (2.1 pages)
- Ban of Tobacco Ads by the Government of India Case Analysis Arguments in Favor The main argument in favor of the ban was to prevent the tobacco industry from influencing children and young people to begin experimenting with tobacco, which would result in habitual smoking. Internal industry documents1 release in the United States, described 14-24 year old as “tomorrow’s cigarette business.” (Ban on Tobacco Ads by the GOI, icmrindia.org) The economic impact of reducing tobacco consumptions would benefit the country.... [tags: Cigarette, Tobacco, Nicotine, Tobacco advertising]
741 words (2.1 pages)
- 1. To discourage the young and old people from smoking and consuming tobacco products the government of India imposed a ban on all advertisements of tobacco products. One of the main reasons why cigarette advertising was banned in India was was due to the hazardous health issues arising from smoking tobacco. Tobacco was considered the most dangerous product consumed by humans. The website, http://www.icmrindia.org/free%20resources/casestudies/ban-tobacco-ads11.htm, states that, “According to world health organization tobacco accounted for over 3 million deaths in 1990, the figure rising to 4,023 million deaths in 1998, it was estimated that tobacco related deaths would rise to 8.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Cigarette]
726 words (2.1 pages)
- In February of 2001, the Government of India proposed legislation that would ban the advertisement by tobacco companies. This ban would include all types of media, the sponsoring of sporting events, and the sponsoring of cultural events. The Government proposing such a bill had the expected consequence of splitting law makers, experts, and the general population into three main camps; those who were for the bill, those against the bill, and those that really didn’t care. The Government of India felt that a ban on advertising activities would help reduce smoking, especially in minors, and give the Indian Government a means in which to start antismoking programs and propaganda (icmrindia.org,... [tags: Tobacco, Nicotine, Cigarette, Tobacco advertising]
1351 words (3.9 pages)
- Summarize the arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising in India Part of the ban on tobacco was based on the "need to protect public health". Cigarettes are not in the best interest of the public, on the contrary they provoke high risk in serious or lethal illness. Also, there was a difference of 0.07% between the contribution (to the G.D.P) of cigarettes and the costs related to health care. The objective of the banning tobacco advertisements was to invert these results so that the health care costs would be reduced in the G.D.P as cigarette sales would decrease at the same time.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Nicotine]
919 words (2.6 pages)
- Ban on Tobacco Advertising in India Tobacco consumption has become a widely known health risk over the past few decades. Many Governments and organizations have started to take action is reducing the consumption of tobacco products, and as result the divide between the tobacco industry and anti-tobacco movements has created much controversy. One example of this worldwide ethical struggle in regards to the tobacco industry is the ban on advertising of tobacco products in India. In 2001 The Indian government introduced a bill to ban the tobacco industry from advertising its products as well as prohibiting them from sponsoring sporting and cultural events.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Passive smoking]
1040 words (3 pages)
- The Government of India sought to create a mechanism to ban Ads on Tobacco usage. In doing so, it raised ethical concerns and arguments from two different sides, those in favor of and against it. For instance, Suhel Seth, CEO of Equus Advertisement, made a strong differing statement such as “The ban does not have teeth. It is typical Knee-jerk reaction by any Government to create some kind of popularity for itself.” Mr. Seth thought the Government was not serious enough to endorse Tobacco Ads prohibition, but instead that the Government was using it to gain acceptance.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco]
900 words (2.6 pages)
- The Extra $ 2000 Promised By Fred?
- Islam, Buddhism, Judaism And Christianity
- I Am Getting My Associates Degree As An Administrative Professional
- Is Trending On Twitter And Facebook
- The Issue Facing Policing Within The Next 33 Years
- Discrimination Facing The Elderly : Socioeconomic Impact On End Of Life Care