Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aalyse how theories of motivation may be applied in the practice of leadership
Compare democratic and autocratic leadership
Aalyse how theories of motivation may be applied in the practice of leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Definition: Autocratic leader- also known as authoritarian style – employs a domineering approach to leadership, which dictates job processes to subordinates. The autocratic leader makes unilateral decisions and then announce those decisions to subordinates. Satterlee, A. (2013). Organizational management and leadership: A Christian perspective. (2nd ed.) Roanoke, VA
Summary: In this leadership, it talks about inspiring others to work harder to accomplish the job or goal (Schermerhorn, 258). When we talk about what makes a leader, we don't look at just a few of the aspects but focus on the whole vision of a leader. The autocratic leader's mirrors McGregor's Theory X with us its strict rules, systems of rewards and penalties, and a more centralized
364). This intends leadership to exercise their authority at individuals, groups and other corporate levels. Bass (2008) determines that positive leadership traits deal with interpersonal competence, intuition, traits of character, biophysical characteristics, personal traits, and skill. With the understanding of this fundamental leadership, we can say that the autocratic leadership style depends on the situation at hand and the company (Kinicki & Fugate, 2012, p. 370). The authoritarian leadership style fits some groups, depending on what they want to accomplish and the company's circumstances. While some leaders are taking up the autocratic style of leadership this is applying rigid rules, could potentially lose respect from subordinates and ruin company morale. Abuse of this type of leadership can make a leader seem controlling, bossy, and dictatorial; it could also prevent subordinates from producing creative solutions to problems. The employees lack of interest in the company could cause resentfulness because their opinions are never heard (Leadership Style, 2008, para. 3-4), which means valuable relationships are never developed. An example of the autocratic leadership not being satisfied and inappropriate is if all the subordinates were just as knowledgeable or skilled as the leader. This would make sense to use the democratic style so that everyone can participate and have an essential role in decision
STYLES OF LEADERSHIP An autocratic leadership style is one where the manager sets objectives, allocates tasks, and insists on obedience. Therefore the group becomes dependent on him or her. The result of this style is the members of the group are often dissatisfied with the leader. This results in little cohesion, the need for high levels of supervision, and poor levels of motivation amongst employees. A democratic leadership style encourages participation in decision making.
My impression of leadership is the ability to motivate, inspire, set a visualization, connect, and lead by example. To become a successful leader you have to be able to convince your followers that you are trustworthy of being followed. During this semester, we have learned many, if not all of the major leadership theories and how they play a role in our everyday lives. But personally, a few of these leadership models caught me and intrigued me the whole semester so much that this paper is going to predominately be referenced about them. For example, the proposed framework that organizes leadership theories based on each theory 's focus and approach. Focus is referred to as whether or not leadership is viewed as a set of traits or actions.
The extreme leadership style of the Authoritarian can have a negative effect on team members. A characteristic of this leader is one who makes all the decisions and passes the directives to subordinates who are expected to carry these out under very close supervision. Because open communication is vital to any project, these perceptions can hurt team performance.
Continuously, there is the affiliative style which means that a leader creates a positive harmony for his employees (Six leadership styles: selecting the right leader, 2016). In other words, that leader put people first and tasks second. The Democratic leader focuses on the decision making, also, the employees in this organisation have the skills, knowledge require. Therefore, the leader trust them in their
Leadership is a quality many of us strive to achieve. To be an excellent leader has been an elusive quest. However, the pursuit of excellent leadership is movement in the right direction. In this paper we will examine the major types of leadership styles. The three types are, Participative or Democratic, Laissez-Faire, and Authoritative.
Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).
...esearch of the situation. This leadership style is beneficial in situations where a quick decision is necessary. The downside to this type of leadership is people who tend to use an autocratic leadership style are seen as controlling and dictatorial. This type of behavior can lead to resentment with the other group members.
In autocratic leadership style, the leaders take direction ship and make decision in own. They do not transfer any domination to the others.
Usually leaders display many different traits. I personally think that autocratic and free rein can be pretty much equally harmful for a good team work. It mainly depends on the business setting and the team needs whether a certain type would meet the organization’s needs. In the case of autocratic style, all decisions are made singlehandedly thus opening the door for many mistakes. Matters are viewed one-sided and many issues can be overlooked and misinterpreted. Such style seems to suppress the natural desire of many people for creativity and contribution to their work; it can feel very suffocating and making people believe that they cannot make a difference. The advantage of this style is displayed in crisis when the decisions must be made fast and enacted immediately (Amanchukwu, Stanley, Ololube, 2015). In the case of free rein too much liberty is given to the employees and sometimes the work place might look like anarchy. There are many situations when the person that manages the business must step in and offer guidance while enforcing the rules and regulations, and when that doesn’t happen, the people might feel lost. If too much liberty is given many due dates might be missed; the organization might start looking very “disorganized” and even unprofessional. Such leadership style might be beneficial in businesses that require their team members to possess flexibility, creativity, or innovative
A leader that retain most of the authority for themselves and make most decision individually. According to, Washington Post Rhee had a bold, confrontational style that turned off many. She use words in her statements ”crappy” and “criminal” to describe the school system and district’s math score. In other words, Rhee leadership style is autocratic leadership.
An autocratic style of leadership is also known as an authoritarian leadership style of managing. Autocratic leaders are those who believe in individual control over all and every decision. Autocratic leaders also do not believe in any inputs from group members. Leaders that practice autocratic style of leadership normally make business choices based on their own agendas and judgments and never accept recommendations from their subordinates.
Authoritarian-parents who are punitive and focus on gaining a child's obedience to parental demands rather than responding to the demands of the child.Authoritarian parenting styles give little to no options to a child. What the parent says goes. It is a rigid approach to raising children that may have been most effective in times of great famine or toil. It was used most commonly in large, traditional families in which the father was the patriarch, and everyone else was called to follow his command. Times have changed greatly since. Doctors see a problem with this approach in modern times,it creates a distance between parent and child in which the child doubts the parent's love for him. It is based on punishment, which can easily create anger.
Autocratic leaders also known as authoritarian leaders are leaders that have absolute authority over subordinates, are in control of the situation they are in, dictate and enforce orders, rarely consult with or ask opinions of others, are highly task driven, and the emotional needs of people are a low priority. The advantage of an Autocratic leader is they typically achieve results quickly; they would make a great leader during the time of crisis or when a project
The leadership style that was possessed here was autocratic leadership. Autocratic leadership involves the leader making decisions and using power to control the situation and others Kelly, P.,
). Burke et al (2006) suggested that transactional leadership, based on contingent rewards, can have a positive effect on followers' satisfaction and performance. However, a transactional leader focuses on management tasks, and will not identify shared values of a team. By contrast, transformational leaders inspire others with their vision and work together with their team to identify common values (Marquis and Huston 2009). The transactional approach is task-orientated and can be effective when meeting deadlines, or in emergencies such as when dealing with a cardiac arrest. This approach can lead to non-holistic patient care, because nurses focus on the task they need to complete, rather than the patient as a whole (Bach and Ellis 2011).