Anti-Japanese And Pearl Harbor

775 Words2 Pages

Naturally, American citizens did not take the bombing of Pearl Harbor lightly. This was a threat, a threat that eventually led to an agreement of war and that led to the infamous anti-Japanese sentiment of World War II in America. The nature of the enemy: Japan. This anti-Japanese sentiment was spewed out in every inch. “Propaganda portrayed the Japanese more than any other Axis power as a foreign, grotesque and uncivilized enemy” (2016). Propaganda depicted the Japanese as, “blindly fanatic and ruthless, with a history of desiring overseas conquests” (2016). Pearl Harbor provided this anger and fear towards Japan and thus shaped the Japanese as murderers. “Remember Dec. 7th!” a propaganda poster exclaims, “we here highly resolve that these …show more content…

Well renounced animation studios of today, Walt Disney, Warner brothers, and Famous Studios all used children cartoons to explicitly display this effort of anti-Japanese sentiment. An example is, You’re a Sap, Mr. Jap a cartoon produced by Famous Studios with Popeye as the protagonist. In the cartoon, Popeye is on a ship humming to and singing along to “You’re a Sap, Mr. Jap” written by James Cavanaugh. This song is highly offensive not only for the ethnic slur but also by referring to the “japs” as fools with the term “sap.” The cartoon then goes on to portray Japanese soldiers as characters with slanted eyes, big teeth, and broken English. The Japanese sailors are also portrayed as untrustworthy when they give Popeye a declaration of peace only to attack him when he has his back turned. Nevertheless, Popeye, being the American soldier he is, is able to single-handedly take on the whole Japanese ship crew once he consumes his famous spinach. He proclaims, “V for victory, we’ll stop em’!” and literally tangles the Japanese ship crew as he asserts, “So you want to tangle with us Americans, huh?” This cartoon also depicts the Japanese as cowards because the naval commander commits suicide and blows up the ship to "save his face." The commander fumbles with the idea, “if Japanese boy win he saves face…If Japanese boy don’t win he lose face.” This …show more content…

First, both are similar in how they spread their message across. Basically, both made the enemy seem like a cruel heartless monster who only has the capability to kill while the heroes are the country’s soldiers/citizens. Both play on the pathos of citizens. They paint this idea that citizens must fight because the enemy is filled with barbarians. Another similarity to point is the efforts taken to get this message across. Even popular directors and animators got involved. This would eventually lead to children watching this propaganda and start the anti-Japanese or anti-American sentiment at an early age. At an early age, if children were exposed to this material it could have affected them emotionally about how to view people who were deemed the enemy. But why target young children? War has no end date. During this time, it would have been difficult to tell when the war would have ended, so to expose children to this resentment at an early age would ensure they would side with their country if the war were to take up to the time they could enlist in the army. Children could easily identify the winners and the losers portrayed in the animations. They could even easily pick up phrase and words such as “Japs” in America and “Red demon Americans” in Japan. Playing on the part of emotions, the resentment of the enemy and the courage of one’s own country were explicitly shown

Open Document