Capital Punishment Essays - Is the Death Penalty Just? Five Works Cited Today there is a big controversy over capital punishment whether or not it works or if it is morally right. Before I go on capital punishment, in America, is only used in felony cases such as murder or a felony buglary, where there was a unintended murder because of a robbery. People who favor the death penalty say that the criminals deserve it and is the only way for justice to be served. People who are against it, the death penalty, say that it is immoral, that no person should be sentenced to death, it has no place in a civilized society, and that since the death penalty cannot be racially bias it should be banished. Capital punishment is justified by several means. First of all, it greatly discourages violent crimes like murder and rape. Many murderers are not serving most--if even half--of their sentences nowadays, due to early parole or overcrowded prisons. If a murderer is sentenced to life imprisonment, not only does it cost the taxpayers money to support them but often their life in the jail is often better than that which some citizens live everyday. These first two facts encourage crime rather than impede them. Also, a person who commits murder deserves a punishment that fits the crime committed. Premeditated murder, being the most vile crime committed, calls for the only fit punishment-- death. I am referring only to murderers getting the death penalty, and not necessarily any other crimes like rape or buglary. There are now currently thirty-seven states that have the death penalty. Even the military has the death penalty. The other states, most of them in the Midwest and Northeast have abolished it. The only two states to not ever have the death penalty is Alaska and Hawaii. Many criminals, including murderers, are getting released from prison before their sentence is completely served because of early parole. This early release is necessary due to overcrowding in the prisons and "good behavior." I think that the sentence they are given should be carried out until the last day and there should be no leeway such as in their sentencing such as parole. If people are thinking of committing murder and are aware that they will be released because of early parole, then it will not effectively deter any future crime from happening. I personally do not want any person who has committed a murder recently living near me or any person that I care about. These people are likely to commit the same crime again, only to receive the same lenient sentence. But if they are aware that if they commit a severe felony crime that they will be sentenced to death without the possibility of parole, then this decision is final then they will have second thoughts about committing the crime. For this reason I and many other citizens are not happy and the only solution I see is the death penalty for any criminal and not just repeat offenders. Another reason that many people are against the death penalty is that they feel that innocent people will be wrongfully executed all in the name of justice. This is not true at all. There are many safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty. These safeguards are: 1. " Capital punishment may be imposed only for a crime for which the death penalty is prescribed by law at the time of its commission. 2. Persons below eighteen years of a age, pregnant women , new mothers or persons who have become insane shall not be sentenced to death. 3. Capital punishment may be imposed only when guilt is determined by clear and convincing evidence leaving no room for an alternative explanation of the facts. 4. Capital punishment may be carried out only after a final judgment rendered by a competent court allowing all possible safeguards to the defendant, including adequate legal assistance. 5. Anyone sentenced to death shall receive the right to appeal to a court of higher jurisdiction. 6. Anyone sentenced to death shall have the right to seek pardon or commutation of sentenced. 7. Capital punishment shall not be carried out pending any appeal, recourse procedure or proceeding relating to pardon or commutation of the sentenced. 8. Also capital punishment shall be carried out so as to inflict the minimum possible suffering." (5) These safeguards will insure that justice will be served without having it suffer. Also these safeguards ensure that the death penalty is racially bias. Fairness in our justice system is expected by American citizens, and these citizens are dependent on the government to provide that. I will reiterate, crime necessitates a proper punishment. The only reasonable discipline for committing cold blooded murder is death. Some opponents to capital punishment claim that "the race of the victim remains a crucial factor in determining who will and will not receive the death penalty." (3) The back up this reason by noticing that minorities are unfairly being executed at higher rates than are Caucasians because the percentage of minorities being executed is not proportional to the percentage of minorities in society. This is true, only in the fact that more murders are committed by minorities, and therefore more minority citizens are being faced with capital punishment. I believe that most of these felonies are committed in large urban cities where the minority population is higher than the white population, hence this outcome occurs. But the most popular case where the death penalty is being sought is the O.J. Simpson case. James Ridgeway, a reporter for Village Voice, said this about the Simpson case "The O.J. Simpson case would have been the highest test of the American public's willingness to put a person to death." (4) Regardless of race, a criminal must be dealt with justly. Lets imagine for a moment there was no death penalty for a moment. The only reasonable sentence would a life sentence. This would be costly to the tax payers, not only for the cost of housing and feeding the prisoner but because of the numerous appeals which wastes man hours and money. By treating criminals in this manner, we are encouraging behavior that will result in a prison sentence. If there is no threat of death to one who commits a murder, than that person is guaranteed to be provided with a decent living environment until their next parole hearing. They are definitely not getting the punishment they deserve. Taking this point one step further, how will the family of the murderer's victim feel about this unfit punishment? The ACLU, American Civil Liberties Union, an opponent of the death penalty is quoted as saying that "What families of murder victims really need is financial and emotional support to help them recover from their loss and resume their lives." (1) What kind of cold hearted person needs money to replace the life of a loved one? It is this kind of attitude that I feel is letting criminals get away with murder. What the victim's family is justice to be served, for the offender to be put to death, not any sort of financial retribution. Justice is all anyone wants and deserves. Capital punishment is therefor necessary but there are opponents who think that it is barbaric. Hugo Adam Bedau, a professor of philosophy at Tufts University, says this about capital punishment " the death penalty is uncivilized in theory and has no place in a civilized society." (2) This is true but we do not live in a civilized society if we did there would be no crime thus the death penalty would be out of date. But in this uncivilized society that we live in I say let the punishment fit the crime, an eye for an eye. Bedau also said that " Criminals no doubt deserve to be punished, and punished with severity appropriate to their culpability and the harm they have caused to the innocent." (2) This I strongly agree with and feel that Bedau is beginning to see the need for capital punishment. In conclusion, murder is a crime that involves taking the life of another human, and that act needs to be punished justly--not with a shortened sentence in an overly luxurious prison, but in an effective manner that gives society the message that it is living in a just world. Moreover, the death penalty is not racially biased, it's just that more minorities are being executed than Caucasians, because more minorities are committing more crimes. If capital punishment is taken away, we will not have an effective justice system and crimes against innocent citizens will continue. This is why capital punishment is necessary and needed in America. Works Cited 1. " The Death Penalty." 3/01/95 (date retrieved). 2. Hugo Adam Bedau. "The Case Aginst The Death Penalty.". July 1992. 3. "Double Justice: Race and the Death Penalty.". 3/01/95 (date retrieved). 4. "Slaughterhouse Justice." Village Voice 11 Oct. 1994: 23-24. 5. " Safeguards Guaranteeing Protection of the Rights of those Facing the Death Pealty.". 3/01/95 (date retrieved).
Racial discrimination has been an immense problem in our society for a very long time. The fact that the race of a victim plays a role in his or her sentencing is appalling. Discrimination within our society needs to come to an end. It’s frightening to think that if you are a minority facing a capital punishment case, which you might be found guilty only because of the color of your skin.
Massage therapy is used to treat Raynaud’s disease by treating the fascia tissue of the affected and surrounding areas (Walton 2007). Tension is provoked with chronic conditions or stress that causes the pliability of the fascia to diminish which causes restriction on the blood flow to the limbs. Any restriction in one area of the fascia can hinder blood flow in other regions. Waltons et al. (2007) used massage therapy in a six week study of a female patient with Raynaud’s disease. This study was done in the winter months when Raynaud’s disease effects are at their peak (Walton 2007). Data on daily habits was acquired for three weeks for post therapy comparison. The patient then received five, 45 minute massage therapy treatments for three weeks. The massages focused on the fascia in the arms, neck and back. Massage therapy was found to decrease duration of vasospasms and pain (Walton 2007).
Throughout the 1925-1975 period, the Native American population of the United States has faced many obstacles. Just a few years before, they had been suppressed by the federal government’s “Anti-Long Hair” policy for all Native American males. This would set the stage for future cultural restraint on the Indians. However, they continued to fight for equality. All through this time period, the experience of the Native American culture has been a struggle for equality in their homeland.
In this paper, I will analyze the amount of progress that has been made in the Native American condition in relation to U.S. government cooperation with the First Nations, with a specific focus on the tribes of the Pacific Northwest. I will begin with a brief, but comprehensive history of U.S.-Native American relations, with a focus on U.S. government policy. Next, I will conduct a case study of the Pacific Northwest, specifically dealing with how the global pressure of the Decade has impacted treaty negotiations and multi-lateral cooperation in the fishing industry, forest service, and tribal gaming. I will then discuss parallels that can be drawn from the cooperation of Maori tribes with the government of New Zealand in the last decade. Finally, I will discuss the unmet needs for the improvement of the indigenous condition, and conclude with an evaluation of the relative progress the Decade has had specifically in the United States, and more generally in the global community.
...25, 1947 when he died of cardiac arrest at his Palm Island palace-in Biscayne Bay,In Florida, Just eight days after his 48th birthday.
Gilroy, Paul. After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture?: Multiculture or Postcolonial Melancholia: Routledge: New York, 2004. Print.
Family history possesses valuable information about a person’s past and future life. It can be used as a powerful screening tool to help conduct decisions about genetic testing for you and family members at risk. Family history can identify potential health problems that an individual has an increased risk for in their lifetime. With early identification, you can begin taking steps to reduce the risk with things such as lifestyle changes of diet and exercise. In many cases, just by adopting a healthier lifestyle can reduce your risk for diseases that run in your family.
Studies show that TF-CBT has been effective when working with children and reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress, depression, and behavior problems following trauma (Cary & McMillen, 2011). Bisson and Andrew (2009) state through systematic review of adults, TF-CBT performed eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy (EMDR) and outperformed other treatments. The Kauffman Best Practices Project (2004) believes that TF-CBT is the “best practice” in the field of child abuse treatment.
Americans have argued over the death penalty since the early days of our country. In the United States only 38 states have capital punishment statutes. As of year ended in 1999, in Texas, the state had executed 496 prisoners since 1930. The laws in the United States have change drastically in regards to capital punishment. An example of this would be the years from 1968 to 1977 due to the nearly 10 year moratorium. During those years, the Supreme Court ruled that capital punishment violated the Eight Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. However, this ended in 1976, when the Supreme Court reversed the ruling. They stated that the punishment of sentencing one to death does not perpetually infringe the Constitution. Richard Nixon said, “Contrary to the views of some social theorists, I am convinced that the death penalty can be an effective deterrent against specific crimes.”1 Whether the case be morally, monetarily, or just pure disagreement, citizens have argued the benefits of capital punishment. While we may all want murders off the street, the problem we come to face is that is capital punishment being used for vengeance or as a deterrent.
For instance, the 1972 Furman V. Georgia case abolished the death penalty for four years on the grounds that capital punishment was extensive with racial inequalities (Latzer 21). Over twenty five years later, those inequalities are higher than ever. The statistics says that African Americans are twelve percent of the U.S. population, but are 43 percent of the prisoners on death row. Although blacks make up 50 percent of all murder victims, 83 percent of the victims in death penalty cases are white. Since 1976 only ten executions involved a white defendant who had killed a bl...
...amily. Overtime, Mandela earned respect and the human rights African Americans deserved in South Africa.
Chemistry overall is a big part of science. As far as the chemical reactions and chemical bonds it is important to know how to identify and how to solve these equations. Bonds are important to life and to life's organisms. Keep in mind that chemistry is not just about potions or projects but mainly about understanding the factors of this category of science. Just know that chemistry is always a part of your everyday life.
Crime is everywhere. Wherever we look, we find criminals and crime. Criminals have become a part of our daily lives. Does this mean we let them be the darkness of our society? No, definitely not. Eliminating crime and criminals is our duty, and we cannot ignore it. Getting the rightly accused to a just punishment is very important. Some criminals commit a crime because they have no other option to survive, but some do it for fun. I do not advocate death penalty for everybody. A person, who stole bread from a grocery store, definitely does not deserve death penalty. However, a serial killer, who kills people for fun or for his personal gain, definitely deserves death penalty. Death penalty should continue in order to eliminate the garbage of our society. Not everybody deserves to die, but some people definitely do. I support death penalty because of several reasons. Firstly, I believe that death penalty serves as a deterrent and helps in reducing crime. Secondly, it is true that death penalty is irreversible, but it is hard to kill a wrongly convicted person due to the several chances given to the convicted to prove his innocence. Thirdly, death penalty assures safety of the society by eliminating these criminals. Finally, I believe in "lex tallionis" - a life for a life.
Environmental science is important in different aspects such as: scientific, societal, political and ethical (Lecture, Gan). The understanding of the earth's process with alternative energy systems and its effects of global climate change are part of environmental science. I cannot emphasis enough how important it is to learn and be aware of the recurring issues in our environment. If people lack awareness of our environmental problems, it will be harder to solve them and our existence may come to an end. Nowadays, there is technology that is eco-friendly and can help our planet. Many people are unaware of the damages to the atmosphere but some
There are many people in the world that do well in school and on tests that are considered very smart people. Stephen Hawking is an example of a man who is more than smart; he is a genius. He is one of the smartest men to have lived in the twentieth and twenty-first century and he has a disease that usually is fatal in two to five years. Living with this disease caused Stephen Hawking to change his lifestyle to overcome this detrimental disease. Stephen Hawking overcame amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by living life in an advanced wheelchair, continuing and focusing his thought on many different scientific advancements, and by expressing his thoughts in writing books and giving speeches worldwide.