More handpicked essays just for you.
Important information on the second amendment of the us constitution to include in a essay
Gun control increases crime rates
Gun control can reduce crime essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Gun control has been a hot topic for very long time. People on the anti-
gun control side believe that gun ownership is a Constitutional right backed by
the Second Amendment. The anti-gun believe that you should be able to posses
and own any firearm. They also believe that gun laws only restrict the law
abiding citizens. Pro-gun control believe that guns are the backbone to our
crime problem. They also believe that gun laws help keep guns of the street and
deter crime.
The Second Amendment reads," A well regulated Militia, being necessary to
the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms,
shall not be infringed" (Caplan p32). "Underlying this amendment are two goals
of an individual and collective defense from violence and aggression, which have
been recognized by Congress" ( Caplan P.32). The second amendment should help
secure right of the people to have a gun in their home. " The government should
not be permitted to declare who would or would not be able to bear arms on the
basis of vague religious tests or any other nebulous standard or artifice" (
Caplan p.39).
The first infringement on the Second Amendment came on November 30, 1993
when President Clinton signed Brady Bill I. The law required that there be a
five day waiting period on all hand gun purchases. The Brady Bill also banned
semi-automatic rifles and other military type weapons. ( Moore 1994 p.434) The
five day waiting period is suppose to stop felons from buying guns. But,
Waiting periods do not stop felons from getting guns. Since 1968 it has been
illegal for a felon to possess any firearm. ( Moore 1994 p 440) Most of the
criminals do not get their guns from stores, most get them by theft or on the
black market. " While legitimate users of firearms encounter intense regulation,
surutiny, and bureaucratic control, illicit markets easily adapt to whatever
difficulties a free society throws in their way" (Polsby p.1). A study by
Professor James D. Wright and Peter H. Rossi, showed that, fifty percent of
criminals expected to get a gun illeagily the same day they get out of prison.
(Blackman A ug 1985)
Brady Bill talks about recording and keeping track of guns for safety
reasons. When people talk about the militia many people believe that the
National Guard is our guarantee for a free state.(Caplan p. 50) People need to
realize that the President is Commander-in-Chief of the National Guard, and may
federalize it any time" ( Caplan p.
environments. Bill Clede ideas in his article seem to be guild by the idea of
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X paved a significant path towards a racially neutral society. There is no doubt that both Martin and Malcolm influenced a whole generation of rebels to fight racism and discrimination. Martin Luther King Jr. had a more peaceful standpoint to attempt to solve racism. Malcolm X on the other hand used violence and force to get the necessary results. They both shared a common objective, but took different actions to achieve the goal.
The U.S. should not have gun control laws. The Second Amendment to the Constitution states that, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has been around since 1791, and there has been gun control almost as long as it's been around. The National Rifle Association is an advocate of the Second Amendment and an opponent of those who propose restrictions on guns. Even Presidents Reagan and Bush are members, and Nixon, Eisenhower, and Kennedy were also members. Why do people feel the need to own a handgun? One reason is heritage. For as long as this country has been around, there have been gun owners, to defend themselves and to hunt for food. Buying, owning, or carrying a handgun doesn't hurt anyone. Until a person commits a crime, he/she is free to choose what he/she wants to do. Even if guns were completely banned from the U.S.A., people would still find a way to get them. Criminals would get guns. They would have their way, and there would be nothing we could do about it. We would have no way to defend ourselves. What is gun control to you? To me, it is the unconstitutional regulation and banning of guns to try to keep the crime rates in this country down. Does it work? Some gun laws are okay and they may work to some extent, but not to the extent that was intended. As for most of these gun laws such as the Brady Law, it serves no purpose. It is only there to make our lawmaking bodies and those of us who are too naive to see the truth feel better. Do you really think that the Brady Law keeps handguns out of the hands of criminals?
history with a right to bear arms. Finally one can see the conflict of views
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. were both great leaders. They both fought for Civil Rights, but they fought for it in different ways. Their upbringings, and studies greatly influenced how they fought for Civil Rights. Malcolm X was more for violent attacks or whatever they thought was needed to achieve their goal. While, Martin Luther King, Jr. was an advocate of nonviolence and fought for what he believed in without violence.
From these interviews, short chats, website, and newsletter, I learned the fundamentals of the KCA, what they stand for, and what they do. I now appreciate this group of people more than ever for their hard work and outstanding leadership in the beef industry and in our Senate!
In the book Guns, Gun Control, and Elections: The Politics and Policy of Firearms, Wilson discusses the complex issue of gun control and the many debates and controversies regarding the issue. Many people throughout the United States feel it is the right as a citizen in the United States to own a weapon, and the government should have no say in the matter. These people believe this because of the part of the Second Amendment that states, “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” People who are strong advocates against gun control use this part of the Second Amendment to drive their point across. Advocates against gun control believe that preserving the freedom of a state through a militia is not the only way it should be looked at, these people believe that the amendment also implies a clause that takes into account one’s right for self-defense.
In 1982, a survey of male inmates from eleven different penitentiaries, stated that sixty-nine percent of the prisoners knew another criminal that had been scared off, wounded, or decided not to commit a crime because they thought the victim had a gun (Agresti and Smith). As The United States heads to the end of 2013, current gun control debates are striking the nation, leaving everyone to develop their own positions on which side of the debate they want to be on. Gun control is defined as efforts to regulate or control sales of guns; however, most of what we hear from other people is that Obama wants to take away every gun in the nation. That’s not entirely true. Obama’s proposal to Congress is a law that would increase background check protocols, ban assault weapons, high-capacity ammunition, and armor-piercing bullets. The proposal also provides more funding for additional police officers on the streets, first response training, mental health programs, and school emergency plans.
African Americans are fortunate to have leaders who fought for a difference in Black America. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X are two powerful men in particular who brought hope to blacks in the United States. Both preached the same message about Blacks having power and strength in the midst of all the hatred that surrounded them. Even though they shared the same dream of equality for their people, the tactics they implied to make these dreams a reality were very different. The background, environment and philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were largely responsible for the distinctly varying responses to American racism.
Johnson, Constance N., and Ralph Shortey. "Should People Be Allowed to Carry Guns Openly?" 4.16(n.d.): 16.Web.
Lott, Jr. John R. More Gun Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Print.
The allegation that videogames cause violent behavior in children has been present as long as videogames themselves. Some researchers said that the Sandy Hook shooter, Adam Lanza, was one intense gamer. “Seung-Hui Cho, the Virginia Tech Shooter was seen by his roomates as odd because he never joined them in video games.”(Beresin) This debate will continue to go on in this country as long as there are horrific crimes that occur. There is much written in the research regarding this issue, and many differing views. The research that is presented in the next few paragraphs supports the theory that it is not the graphic video games that produce aggressive behavior, but other factors in a child’s life that create violent actions.
In history we know that no two men are alike but, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were phenomenal people and leaders. Both had visualized some type of change in the future, yet were not literally able to see it. Both Dr. King and Malcolm X set out to bring a sense of confidence to blacks all over the United States. Their main purpose was to help instill black’s power and strength so that they could overcome racial disparity and prejudice that surrounded them, but both of them had very unique and distinct different ways of promoting their message. Martin was more geared and focused on equality and wellness of the world as a whole, a Malcolm X’s personal interpretation of the world was very well blinded by anger, bitterness, and the desire to get revenge at the expense of the world that he thought treated him unfairly.
...ocent, honest people who now need guns to protect themselves from the illegal guns in the hands of a criminal. The Justice Department conducted a survey of inmates in 1997 and it showed that “80% had obtained guns from family, friends, or an illegal source” (Gold, 112).
I believe that there are two clear messages in this novel. The first has been explained in the above paragraph however I will emphasise it slightly. If a society divides it will become dangerous. Throughout history this has been proven. Although I say Robert Swindells has warned us of a terrible future have we not already segregated in the past? Take South Africa for example. 50 years ago they were under apartheid (separating). The Black men were not allowed to enter the white mans land unless he had a visa. They were deprived of their citizenship. Robert Swindells has taken great lengths to remind and warn us that we cannot ever redo the mistakes set in the pas...