Theme, Atmosphere, and Style of The Chrysalids Theme: Theme is very closely tied with satire in this novel. Numerous main ideas of the novel are pointed towards the shortcomings of Waknuk society, and even at our society. For example, Waknuk society will banish from their society anything that is not made in their concept of the true image. In our history of mankind some groups have always reacted negatively towards groups that are supposedly different. Recent historical events of genocide make what Waknuk does look like child's play. For instance, during World War II, when six million Jews were killed. The expulsion of the Armenians from Turkey, in Cambodia in the 1970s and in Rwanda in 1994. Our society has institutions and clinics to change to abnormal into our concept of normal. David's society, despite its great concern for the True Image, allows the great-horses to be introduced into their society. Although they are obviously not normal, for the sake of profit the True Image can be ignored. Hypocrisy is shown to be a universal human condition and the people of Waknuk are no different from us. The chief critical theme, however, is the one implied by the title of the novel. Chrysalid is a term taken from biology. It describes the state through which a larva must pass before becoming an insect. In this state, the larva is wrapped in a hard case or shell, takes no food and is totally inactive. This is precisely the state that Joseph Strorm and his kind are trying to maintain and force on humanity. As the Sealand lady points out, evolution cannot be denied and the chrysalid cannot be stopped in its development to the next stage. The Waknuk society's anti-intellectualism, which tries to put a stop to both logic and imagination, and its efforts to deny evolution, are doomed to be a dead end. Wyndham's attack on this kind of thinking varies from satire to outright virulence. The satire is chiefly directed at Joseph Strorm. Since he embodies all that is wrong with the community's religious ideas, he is made to appear as a frustrated and dangerous person. But criticism can take a crueler form, such as Sophie's fate, or Aunt Harriet's suicide. Their stories introduce a sense of helpless frustration for they point out not only the foolishness of the Waknuk philosophy but, also, the futility of trying to defeat it. Uncle Axel, acting as the mouthpiece of the author, supplies the most accurate portrait, for he tells David that every group of people he has seen in his travels thinks that the True Image is themselves. No one, he points out, could ever be sure that the True Image is right, for it comes from Nicholson's Repentances, written after Tribulation. Atmosphere: In The Chrysalids, atmosphere varies extensively. There is the normal interest at the beginning of a novel as the characters reveal themselves, and the plot unfolds. But the stronger curiosity in this novel arises from the urge to identify the society. It is familiar, yet unfamiliar. Just when the reader has determined that it belongs to the eighteenth century, somewhere in the Western Hemisphere, a vague reference is given to suggest that this is not so. Then, there is the peculiarity of the society itself. These people seem like ourselves, but they have a disturbingly different set of beliefs, further piquing our curiosity. As the setting, characters and background are established, the atmosphere begins to change to one of fear. This occurs for two reasons. The amazing lack of charity, and unbending set of rules in David's community are frightening in themselves but, by this time, we have come to know and like David and, realizing that he, too, is a deviant, we fear for him. Several incidents such as the flight of the Wenders, and the suicide of Aunt Harriet, increase this fear. We now anticipate and expect that David will be discovered. When it finally does happen there is almost a sense of relief. By this time, though, an air of hope is present. Petra's communication with a whole society of "thought-makers" gives some assurance that the fugitives will escape. Only at the very end of the novel are there any feelings of joy. Style: This is a novel of plot and theme. The author is mainly concerned with sociological and psychological issues in a society faced with the after effects of a nuclear holocaust. Wyndham aims at a general impression, rather than writing an in-depth analysis of an individual's character faced with a specific set of circumstances. Although there are many opportunities for long descriptive passages, the author refrains from doing so. To give a gruesome description of various forms of deviation would only sensationalize the story, and the author has a more serious purpose. Only the character of David is revealed to any extent, and he is the only one who develops appreciably. With the exception of Sophie, the other characters are one-sided representative characters like Jacob or Joseph Strorm. Most of the characters of the novel fall into groups. The Waknuk group is held together by its religion, the Fringes people by their deviations, and David and his group by their telepathic abilities. The story is told in the first person. This narrative method has advantages for the novel. It is a more personal account and David is more likely to win the reader to his side, against the horrors of Waknuk. Although the method necessitates a limited view-point, it is, therefore, a better one for moulding the reader's impressions. The reader is taken into David's confidence and asked to share the secret of his deviation. Above all, there is an air of truth to what David is saying, and this fact intensifies every situation in the novel. Background in a novel of this type is often very involved. Science fiction by its very nature deals with situations apart from the reader's experience and, therefore, requires long explanations. But the conditions of David's civilization differ only in detail from our own and can be related partly by the child-David as he explains them to Sophie. For David to do all of the narration would be tiresome, and as he is only a child, he is not likely to know all the information. Conveniently, Uncle Axel explains it to him. Because Axel is a broad-minded, thinking person, the reader is given a fuller, less prejudiced account than he might have received from someone like Joseph Strorm.
Despair is evident throughout the book, more so from Waknuk citizens oppressing those who are different. “Katherine, a girl from a neighboring farm who could produce thought shapes similar to David’s was found out and taken to the inspector, where, she was ”broken”. Sally, who was also taken with Katherine to the inspector, said to the rest of the thought shapers, “They’ve broken Katherine…Oh Katherine darling… [t]hey’re torturing her…She’s all clouded now. She can’t hear us.” Her thoughts dissolved into shapeless distress.” (Wyndham 130). Clearly Katherine had been severely hurt enough to reveal her ability of producing thought shapes which would put all the thought shapers in danger and tortured enough that Sally sends distress showing how hopeless they indeed are. Furthermore when David found out his father was apart of the party coming to battle the Fringe people he is in sheer distress. He states, “ ‘Purity…’I said. ‘The will of the Lord. Honor thy father…Am I supposed to forgive him! Or try to kill him?’” (182). David is conflicted and rather flustered between his respect and love for his father yet as a deviant they are fighting for different sides and he knows either he or his father will die in the end. Additionally, during the battle itself, one of David’s most loyal friends parishes before his eyes. D...
1. In the book, the father tries to help the son in the beginning but then throughout the book he stops trying to help and listens to the mother. If I had been in this same situation, I would have helped get the child away from his mother because nobody should have to live like that. The father was tired of having to watch his son get abused so eventually he just left and didn’t do anything. David thought that his father would help him but he did not.
He tries to explain that in order to be happy, one must put himself in other people's shoes, to know that there is another world that you must enter that revolves around another individual. A person must learn that he must look at both sides of the road before crossing the road of judgment. Meaning that a person must think twice before judging someone due to the fact that you are incapable off reading other people's minds thus you cannot make a judgment about how tough their lives are and the daily hardships that they have to put up with. Before you start complaining about how long the line at the store is, realise that you are not the only person waiting in line and that there are other people waiting in line too just like you are. David uses plenty of metaphors and examples in order to further explain to the audience his statement. One example he uses in the beginning of the story is the fish example, where two young fish meet an older fish who asks them "how is the water", the two young fish then go on to reply by saying "what the hell is water?". After reading through the story, one realises that what the author means by 'water' is that in this scene, water is the representation of life. Thus you can think of it as the older fish asking the
David starts out by telling us about the general attitude of a Know-Nothing, stating that
In “The Veldt,” the children use their advanced home to kill their parents. The children’s motive behind killing their parents is revenge. They are upset that the parents are going to shut down the house and basically take away the thing that they love. They kill their parents so they can keep their home. In “The Small Assassin,” a similar situation happens. When Lucifer is born, he is taken from a place that he considered home for nine months. He is taken out of his mother’s womb and brought into this world unwillingly. The control that he had was taken away from him. He is angry at the person responsible for that: that person is Alice. He knows that Alice is the reason he is now in a world that is not as comforting as the womb: a world that is too big. It is possible that he views David as an accomplice to the eviction from his home. In a way, the doctor could also be seen as a person that assisted Alice and David in removing Lucifer from his home. In both stories, the parents have either threatened to take away the home that the children loved, or the parents have successfully taken that place of comfort away. The children in both stories take things into their own hands and kill their parents. The stories also have another thing in common. The children did not have love for their parents. In “The Veldt,” the house replaced the parents when it came to affection. It does everything for the children. They love the house more than their parents, so when the choice is given to them, they take it. In “The Small Assassin,” Alice has no love for Lucifer and he probably felt the same way about her. When Alice was explaining why David should fear the baby, she
Now, we can’t do that - but you and Rosalind can. Just think that over Davie. You two may be nearer to the image than we are” (64). David has always been doubtful about his thought-shaping powers because of the Waknuk community’s stance on mutants and deviations. When someone like Uncle Axel says that he believes David is closer to the image than norms are, David feels more confident in himself and his place in Waknuk’s twisted society. Uncle Axel is a fatherly figure and role model to David, so David confides in Uncle Axel and trusts his instincts and his knowledge. Therefore, David is getting closer to accepting himself as a unique individual, with the help of Uncle Axel’s suggestions. In addition, Uncle Axel clarifies what makes a man, man. David thought it was their soul but Uncle Axel states: “Well, then, what makes a man a man is something inside him… No, what makes man man is mind. It’s not a thing, it’s a quality, and minds aren’t all the same value; they’re better or worse” (79,80). Uncle Axel is a firm believer that the Definition of Man is nonsense and now he expresses his beliefs to David. David is conflicted between Waknuk’s
In Waknuk, unreasonable actions in response to things outside the established norm have been fully accepted and integrated into their society because very few people question the beliefs, fewer speak out. The narrator David, is still young and impressionable when he meets Sophie who has an extra toe on each foot, a real-life example of a blasphemy, a person who does not fit in the neat image of man. After he meets her, he begins to question the beliefs he has adopted. David thinks, “The ways of the world [are] very puzzling…”(14) after realizing that “there was nothing frightful about Sophie.” (14) David later has a dream that represents his changing values after being able to comprehend the brutality of Waknuk’s primitive thinking. In his dream, “[They] were all gathered in the yard, just as [they] had been at the last Purification. Then it had been a little hairless calf that stood waiting, blinking stupidly at the knife in [his] father’s hand; this time it was a little girl, Sophie…” (28) Waknuk’s values are a perversion of a righteous moral compass and this is also embodied in his dream as Sophie “[implored] them to help her, but none of them moved and none of their faces had any expression.” David’s observations of Waknuk’s community are depicted as thinking Sophie is less than an animal to his father
The society of Waknuk is taught to follow the laws of God and the ’Definition of Man’ for they fear the punishment that they will receive if they do not so. This fear has blinded the people of Waknuk, so much so that they cannot differentiate between right and wrong, devotion and discrimination.
The two traits that David has that helped him survive the deadly threat was being clever, and driven. In the story “The Long Cold Night.” David is clever in many ways. One way is that I read in the story on page 24 it said “ In a turmoil of doubts, David put the card in his inner pocket.He said nothing about it to Grotan.” This show that David was clever in not showing the card to Grotan because he could use the card later for evidence. Then if he showed the card to Grotan David could have been dead. Another way David was clever was on page 29 when it said “With a sudden jerk, he pulled the door wide open. Empty space met that final chop of Grotan's.” This proves that David is
David finds out that the teachings of Waknuk are not the only one. In The Chrysalids Sophie,
David is our tragic hero and though he does not die in the end of the book, he does seem to give up on life. He is a beaten man in the end. Not only does he forgive Melanie's parents but he decides to let the dog that likes him die. After sleeping with Bev Shaw he realizes this is type of woman he must not be comfortable with. This shows that David has given up pursuing the women he wants to and basically just surrendered or died in essence.
This last dreamscape comments on the political expulsion of some material from the Bible either being tampered with or edited by church officials to make a certain persons character not be tarnished by the horrible or embarrassing things they have done. Repeatedly David, played by the son Bart, messes up or does something horrible to reply with the same thought every time, “I hope they don’t put that in the Bible.” This idea is interesting because it brings into David’s major character flaws that are present in the Bible but are overshadowed by the fact that he was an efficient king. Even after David conquers the giant monster, which he fails the first time, the people say that he really wasn’t that bad of a king just a bad person which the people were originally fine with in the case of David. This alternate telling also makes fun of the biblical timeline having the final battle on the top of the tower of Babel and having David constantly forgetting that Goliath 2 isn’t Samson every time he cuts his hair to drain his strength commenting that, “These Biblical, timelines get confusing
Wuthering Heights is a classic novel that despite its age, still holds relevance in the world of literature. As I was reading the book, I was often left astonished by the characters. They were portrayed in a way that they would leave you wondering whether their actions were wrong or right. In reality, all human beings are prone to be fallible. However, the one thing that does set us apart is the aftermath of those mistakes.
David Strom had always dreamt of a different world. A more peaceful and accepting one than Waknuk, but to do so meant that he was going against the beliefs he was raised with. “Only the image of God is man”, “Keep pure the stock of the Lord”, “In purity our salvation”, “Watch for thou mutant”, “The norm is the will of God”, “Reproduction is the only holy production” and “The devil is the father of deviation” were all lessons that he was forced into memorizing. One day when was playing on the hills around Waknuk, he met a girl named Sophie. Sophie was a deviant, someone who does not abide by the normal image of man. Joseph Strom, David’s father, hated deviants. David didn’t understand why his father hated them so much. Sophie had six toes, but David didn’t care and decided to keep her secret from his father because she was his friend. David was going to protect Sophie. The people of Waknuk were terrified of any and all deviations because of a past event called Tribulation which wiped out the Old People, a human race who were advanced than Joseph’s era. Due to what Joseph’s dad, Elias Strom, believed they were all killed because God hated their ignorance of deviants and allowed them to live and make God’s pure stock tainted. David had a secret himself; he too was a deviant. David was a telepath and could talk to other telepaths with his mind, instead of his words. One day, his Uncle Axel discovered David’s secret. Uncle Axel was unlike other people and made the choice to protect David and his friends. However, not everyone was as kind as Uncle Axel. While playing in a creek, David’s friend Alan finds out that Sophie has six toes and reports her to the inspector. The inspector is the man who judges whether someone is a “normal” and ...
Though there are many factors in the formation of a hurricane, it all starts with having warm ocean water, mainly around summer and early autumn. Hurricanes form in low-pressure areas in which winds in the low levels of the atmosphere converge and uplift. The water vapor from the heated ocean water is the energy source for the hurricane. The water must be warm enough to put heat and moisture into the atmosphere. The atmospheric moisture combines with the energy or ‘fuel’ and propels the hurricane. The wind must maintain itself in order to become a hurricane. Hurricanes continue to grow stronger while they are traveling over warm ocean water. Once a hurricane reaches a mass of cold ocean water or land, they lose their source of fuel and gradually decrease in power and size. Hurricanes cause great amounts of damage to coastal land when the hurricane is fresh off warm water.