Analysis Of The Article Don T Blame The Eater

1068 Words3 Pages

In the Article “Don’t Blame the Eater”, the author, David Zinczenko discounts many details while adverting his notion that Fast Food Corporations are at fault for obesity in adolescents. Zinczenko uses rhetoric, and personal experience to divert the reader’s attention to the emotional aspects of the above mentioned argument instead of showing genuine refutable actualities. At the start of his article Zinczenko complicates matters when he writes “And the problem isn’t just theirs- it’s all of ours.”, implying that we contribute to obesity misfortunes among children. However, his personal account about being a teen who acquired a large quantity of weight because of an assiduous mother, and lack of food alternatives contradicts the statement …show more content…

However, contrary to what the author stated, no factual evidence was exhibited to support this. Zinczenko refutes his own personal experience with his overall argument by further explaining how he turned his life around. As a teen Zinczenko was able to lose weight and maintain his diet by going to college, and later joining the Navy Reserves. This shows that he was able to engage into physical activities that would prompt his weight loss and healthy dieting. In the opposing viewpoints database, the author states that “…changes in caloric intake cannot solely account for the observed trends in national weight gain.” (Church, Timothy S. "The Rise in Obesity Is Due Mainly to Physical Inactivity.”). This means that Fast Food Corporations cannot single-handedly be held responsible for the ramifications of obesity . Zinczenko’s assertion that a person will endure a lifetime of obesity from regularly consuming Fast Food does not fit his reflection of his own personal experience with obesity, therefore creating paradoxes in his above- mentioned …show more content…

Zinczenko himself writes “Drive down any thoroughfare in America, and I guarantee you’ll see one of our country’s more than 13,000 McDonalds restaurants.” Basically he is informing us that lack of healthy food options attributes to obesity. Zinczenko additionally states “Now drive back up the block and try to find someplace to find a grapefruit.”, insinuating America has a scarcity of healthy food alternatives for its people. He utilizes imagery symbolism to further emphasize his point of food alternatives towards the reader’s attention. While using imagery, the author fails to use factual information that would represent this focal point. Adding to Zinczenko’s argument, I would point out that there are many grocery stores, gas stations, and other restaurants that offer healthier food choices for affordable prices, and that almost in every vicinity, or neighborhood lies a supermarket, and other food establishments. Zinczenko makes it seem like obesity occurs on account of the large presence of fast food restaurants, and an inadequacy of healthy food alternatives. This hyperbole Zinczenko applies in the article refutes his argument because it is too far-fetched, exaggerated, and is used to push the emotions out of the reader, rather than proving any facts towards the overall

Open Document