Obesity is a growing public health subject. However, what is obesity? Well, for the ignorant it’s defined as having a body mass index (BMI) higher than the number 30. Additionally, body mass index is “A measure of weight relative to height” (Wood 292). The body mass index is normally measured as [Weight in pounds ÷ (Height in inches x Height in inches)] x 703; just if anyone is curious. So, basically in an ill-mannered way, obesity is just being really fat. We all know that there is a good amount of obese people around but how much is there exactly. Well, according to one study there was ...
... middle of paper ...
...seem very obvious, you have to remember that he pretty much predicted this predicament a long time ago. If Aristotle was alive and he was with us in this world, he would say “If you want to be happy you have to be in the moderate balance of your body weight”. He would likely tell us not to moderately aim to be in the healthy mean. Instead, he would probably suggest aiming to the other extreme of the diet and exercise. In order for the pull of being in one extreme (obese) to cause us to not fall onto the other extreme (skinny) but the mean of both extremes.
From examining Aristotle’s theory of the Golden Mean and reading up on statistics and so forth about obesity and depression. Then, applying Aristotle’s theory onto the real life situation, I would, as I said before not only think that Aristotle’s theory can fix our predicament but that it had foreseen it as well.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Aristotle’s thoughts on ethics conclude that all humans must have a purpose in life in order to be happy. I believe that some of the basics of his ideas still hold true today. This essay points out some of those ideas. It was Aristotle’s belief that everything, including humans, had a telos or goal in life. The end result or goal was said to be happiness or “eudaimonia”. He explained that eudaimonia was different for each person, and that each had a different idea of what it meant. Further, he said that people must do things in moderation, but at the same time do enough.... [tags: Aristotle and the Concept of Telos]
577 words (1.6 pages)
- For Aristotle the overall goal of life would be to attain happiness, that will arise from though and rational thinking. A key goal would be taking in the perspective of the golden mean and selecting virtuous actions. A virtuous action is considered to moral when has motivation behind it to do the right thing. For people with good character virtues is acquired over time by the repetition of proceeding in virtuous ways. Aristotle felt as though becoming a virtuous person was a matter of habit and could be learned over time.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Human, Thought]
1418 words (4.1 pages)
- In Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean, he describes his view on virtue and it in relation to an individual’s everyday life. Aristotle offers the audience a system of virtue that allows them to improve their daily habits, make them more virtuous, and therefore a better person. Through this standpoint, we can intertwine morality with ones personality. Aristotle’s theories on virtue vary vastly from those of his predecessors. As opposed to the views of someone such as Plato, who believed that goodness came from knowledge, Aristotle argued that goodness, was achieved by building virtuous habits.... [tags: Philosophy]
719 words (2.1 pages)
- Virtue ethics is a theory that deemphasizes rules, consequences and particular acts and places the focus on the kind of person who is acting. It is an individual based moral system and focuses on character traits. It does not factor in religion, society, or culture, but more so the individual’s choice in situations. This theory does not give a set of rules on what to do, but rather emphasizes the question, “How should one become a better person?” The focus of the theory is attempting to create good virtuous human beings.... [tags: Ethics, Virtue, Confucius, Virtue ethics]
1298 words (3.7 pages)
- Plato (427-347 B.C.) and Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) Plato and Aristotle were different in their philosophical approaches Aristotle being the pragmatist who dealt with the measurable and concrete, while Plato dealt with the world (two worlds) of concepts and ideas. The aim of this short essay is, therefore, an attempt to explore, and highlight the difference and relevance, if any, of Aristotelian ethical theory, and Platonism ethical theory on and to the modern-day issues of “Social Justice”. There are many “Issues Facing America” today, Social Justice or should we say “social injustice”, is the main issue that concern individuals in every facet of life, the aim of this short essay is, therefo... [tags: Ethics, Virtue, Justice, Morality]
963 words (2.8 pages)
- In ancient Greece two great written philosophers lived. First there was Plato and then Aristotle. Aristotle was a pupil of Plato. Despite being taught by Plato they had different theories and views. Their ethics were very typical and traditional of ancient Greece but Aristotle detailed virtue ethics and the path to happiness. Plato’s political theories for a utopian society varied from Aristotle’s view of ‘best state for each society’. Their metaphysical theories are complete opposites and very contradicting.... [tags: Greek Philosophy Virtue Ethics Happiness Society]
1826 words (5.2 pages)
- This essay will be examining the ethics of Plato (428-347 BCE) and Aristotle (384-322 B.C). I will firstly attempt to summarise the three fundamental concepts of Plato and Aristotle before providing my own opinion and view on their ethics. I will concentrate on their theories on the good life as a life of justice, censorship and knowledge. Plato was a philosopher who was both a rationalist and absolutist. According to his view, people must be schooled to acquire certain kinds of knowledge, for example, mathematics, philosophy and so forth.... [tags: Philosophy]
1163 words (3.3 pages)
- To be good is good but it has to be done for the right reason. Aristotle and Kant are two famous philosophers who have different ethical theories. The theory’s of virtue and duties rest not only on laws and obligations but from what comes from the inside. Morality comes from inner strength, character and how we live our life to the best end. Aristole 384-322 b.c.e. Aristotle conceptualized the branches of philosophy and contributed to the theories in logic, metaphysics, ethics and political philosophy (book 237).... [tags: Philosophy, Philosophers]
1297 words (3.7 pages)
- ﻿In Contrast to Plato Unlike Plato, Aristotle believed that sensory perceptions in the human soul are reflections of objects, and thoughts in consciousness are based on what we have already seen. He believed that humans have the innate power of reason, and the innate faculty of organizing things into categories and classes, but no innate ideas. No Innate Ideas Plato believed that the idea “chicken” came before the sensory world’s chicken, but Aristotle refused this theory.... [tags: essays research papers]
633 words (1.8 pages)
- Aristotle believes that happiness is the ultimate goal in life. You can’t reach happiness unless you work hard and become successful. That is where virtue comes into play. A human’s function is to engage in “an activity of the soul which is in accordance with virtue” and which “is in conformity with reason” (page 76, Palmer). The two kinds of virtue are intellectual and moral. Our virtues are what make us all individual and all different. Intellectual virtues are what we are born with and what we learn.... [tags: Happiness Virtue]
1059 words (3 pages)