Courage And Virtue In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

737 Words2 Pages

In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he details virtues as a way to the greatest end, happiness. It is important, therefore, to understand what exactly virtue is and how to acquire virtue. Through his logic, Aristotle reveals that in order to acquire virtue, it must be practiced, like practicing an instrument in order to gain skill. However, one must practice the virtue correctly, so it must then be determined what each moral virtue is exactly. Aristotle understands moral virtue to be a mean, not an excess of a quality or a deficiency of a quality. In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle describes two virtues in detail as a mean: courage and temperance. First, Aristotle examines how excess and defect are harmful and then how virtue is the intermediate of these two extremes. He observes that “it is the nature of such things to be destroyed by defect and excess”(2.1104.11-12). For example, it is harmful if a person eats too much, or if he does not eat at all. Therefore, there must …show more content…

Courage is not a failure to fear evil since “to fear some things is even right and noble, and it is base not to fear them”(3.1115.11-12). The brave man fears death, but is not afraid to stand up to this fear. However, for Aristotle, this only applies to the noblest death, death in battle. Excess of courage is recklessness, which is an overconfidence and a lack of fear. This is a vice because the overconfident man is boastful and only pretends to have courage. This man only appears to be courageous, he is not actually brave. A deficiency of courage is cowardice, which is a fear of everything. The coward lacks confidence and despairs, since confidence is what gives one hope. Therefore courage is a mean between recklessness and cowardice. The courageous man is able to deliberate in different circumstances if he ought to fear something based on whether it is noble or base to fear

Open Document