Arguments Against Euthanasia

1646 Words4 Pages

Global Analysis

Out of the three anti-euthanasia articles that I have thus far analyzed, two share a similar pattern. Both the American Medical Association's “Opinion 2.21 – Euthanasia” and William F. May's “Rising to the Occasion of Our Death” utilize values as objects of agreement, or grounds of a proposed policy (value judgements). According to Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s “Facts, Values, and Hierarchies” piece, objects of agreements serve the premises and focus on finding common ground – or “what is supposed to be accepted by the hearers [to get the] agreement of the audience” (Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 65). Since euthanasia is an ethical subject, value-based arguments are abundant in terms of policy arguments.

Both May and the AMA appeal to the morality of their audiences in order to convince them to act against active euthanasia, defined by May as “mercy killings” and by the AMA as the “administration of a lethal agent by another person to a patient for the purpose of relieving the patient’s intolerable and incurable suffering” ("Opinion 2.21 – Euthanasia."). More specifically, they are appealing to the value of what is “good” for the individual suffering, for their loved ones, and for society.

Their appeals to values are not simply opinions, however; this appeal can actually be treated as a fact or a truth. Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca qualify that in order for a value to be taken as a truth or fact, it must be universally acknowledged, and in order for it to be universally acknowledged, it must be vague. “It is by virtue of their being vague,” these authors proclaim, “that these values appear as universal values and lay claim to a status similar to that of facts” (Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 76). Nevert...

... middle of paper ...

...veryone, because the AMA and May were able to show that their standards of evaluating morality fell under their audience's general system of belief of not murdering anyone, they were able to overcome the obstacle of differing value hierarchies.

Works Cited

Agatucci, Cara. "Cora Agatucci's Toulmin-Style Analysis of May's Argument." WR 122 Course Home

Page. N.p., 06 Jan. 2010. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.

May, William F. "Rising to the Occasion of our Death." The Christian Century Jul 11 1990: 662.

ProQuest. Web. 31 Mar. 2014

"Opinion 2.21 – Euthanasia." Opinion 2.21 – Euthanasia. American Medical Association, June 1996.

Web. 16 Mar. 2014.

Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. Facts, Values, and Hierarchies, The New Rhetoric.

N.p.: n.p., n.d. PDF.

The Stases and Other Rhetorical Concepts from Introduction to Academic Writing. N.p.: n.p., n.d. PDF.

Open Document