The opponents feel there is an obvious obligation to help people with substance abuse issues. However they believe the obligation the government has in protecting the rights of it 's citizens supersedes the consequences that come with mandatory drug tests. ((COVERT))
Opponents believe that the State of Texas has an obligation, through its welfare programming, to help citizens refrain from drug addiction and live a more economically stable life. Thus, stakeholders like the Center for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), do not recommend mandatory drug testing of welfare recipients. This is because CAMH believes that the stigma associated with testing impacted those on welfare negatively (aclu). instead, CAMH believe the proper way for Texas to assert their obligation to its poor can be conducted through better training of TANF workers to government workers to better recognize signs of substance abuse, alcoholism, gambling addictions, and mental disorders (aclu).
Analysis of Consequences
The opponents ' disagreement with the said policy may lead to its own consequences however. Although opponents do not want mandatory drug testing of applicants to pass, the consequences of this mean the issue of drug use within low-income families may not be addressed. Opponents say this is not of grave concern, because there are statistics provided from other states within their argument showing a low percentage of welfare recipients actually fail drug tests. Nevertheless, a consequence of not amending welfare legislature is that drug abuse has the potential to continue or even increase, which proponents say would lead to an insufficient and economically unprogressive lower-class society.
Analysis of Normative Princi...
... middle of paper ...
...rebut this argument, the tentative solution is said to be less invasive than seizing one 's belonging (i.e.) a mandatory drug test. Also, the Fourth Amendment violation may be rebutted by arguing that "effects" would refer to one 's work place and social relationships, which are for the most part, public. Furthermore, Wyman (see Appendix @) concluded that the invasion into a welfare recipients home for purposes of monitoring their adherence to welfare guidelines is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Lastly, to rebut the potential argument that the hired caseworkers would prove costly, the tentative solution would say that although welfare cost would increase, the price may be payed back quicker than simply getting one off drugs, the welfare recipient would soon learn to become self-sufficient and begin contributing tax dollars as a non-welfare citizen could.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In a country being run ramped by drugs, it is important for us to evaluate everything that may be contributing to the growth of the drug trade. According to a study conducted by the Substance Abuse Policy Research Program, approximately twenty percent of the welfare recipients questioned admitted to the using an illicit drug at some point in the last year. People who are pro drug testing say that creating a drug test policy for all Welfare recipients would help cut down on the number of federal dollars that might possibly be aiding the illegal drug trade.... [tags: Illegal drug trade, Drug]
998 words (2.9 pages)
- For decades, since 1935, Americans have been receiving financial assistance from the government for many reasons. These reasons can range from being without a job for a period of time, to being too old to work, to even being too poor to support a family. One of the biggest controversial topics of welfare are should we drug test welfare recipients. There are many pros and cons to both sides of the argument, but drug testing welfare recipients could make a positive impact on the American society. Some of the positive impacts of drug testing welfare recipients are possibly saving taxpayers’ money, encouraging drug free lives, creating a fairness between working class, and non-working class fami... [tags: United States, Social class, Working class]
908 words (2.6 pages)
- There is an ongoing debate over whether or not welfare recipients should be drug tested to receive the benefits. Both sides of the argument have merit. Those who oppose the idea of drug testing say that it is unconstitutional and violates the Fourth Amendment. Furthermore, they claim that this law stereotypes and discriminates against those from low socioeconomic demographics, implying that because they are poor, they must be drug addicts. However, those who support the law note that its intended purpose is to ensure that taxpayer money is not being squandered on people who only plan to abuse this assistance.... [tags: drug addicts, discrimination]
1056 words (3 pages)
- Drug testing should be mandatory in all states for those receiving or applying for government assistance, such as TANF (Transitional Assistance to Needy Families), SNAP, Unemployment Benefits and even those receiving Pell Grants to continue their education; or should it. This is a question everyone has an opinion on from the politicians to the general public. I will attempt to show arguments against and for the program of drug testing that has already been adopted in some states, such as Florida (Tarren Bragdon, Foundation for Government Accountability), Arizona and Missouri (Aileen, Suitcase Clinic).... [tags: Drug Testing Public Assistance]
1367 words (3.9 pages)
- It’s the middle of the month and bills are due. Will there be enough money to pay the bills and buy the groceries for the month. These are just a few worries that welfare recipients have everyday of their life living paycheck to paycheck. Should welfare recipients be stereotyped as drug users just because they don’t have all the money they need to pay for the cost of living. Citizens living like this don’t exactly have the spare money to pay for the drug tests. So who will pay for these tests. In Lizette Alvarez’s article, she used Newton’s statement that citizens who are drug tested before receiving welfare benefits and test negative will be reimbursed by the state, but the money that is us... [tags: welfare recipients, paychecks, money]
1217 words (3.5 pages)
- How many times have you witnessed or heard stories about a Welfare recipients selling their food stamps for cash. We automatically assume it is to buy drugs, alcohol, cigarettes or, even a lottery ticket. What about the Facebook post showing welfare recipients buying an IPhone, IPad or gaming system. The comments that are attached to those postings show the anger people have against these behaviors. The problem is we assume all Welfare recipients are like this and all recipients are lazy and out to cheat the system.... [tags: Drug, Drug addiction, Illegal drug trade]
1049 words (3 pages)
- A major issue in society today is welfare and its effect on everyday life for the country as a whole. There has always been a disagreement about whether tax money should be going to assist the needy and if social programs that bring government assistance are the best way that the tax money can be used. The taxpayers of America are concerned that welfare recipients are abusing the system and taking benefits where they aren’t needed or using the money received to buy various drugs. This fear that welfare recipients are just lazy people who don’t want to work and instead decide to “cheat the system” to reap benefits has been a fear among taxpayers that has been particularly relevant in the past... [tags: conditions for government assistance]
1670 words (4.8 pages)
- There is an ongoing debate over whether or not Welfare recipients should be drug tested to receive the benefits. The lines of reasoning from both sides of this argument have unambiguous points. Those who oppose the idea of drug testing say that it is unconstitutional, and violates the Fourth Amendment. Furthermore, they claim that this law stereotypes and discriminates against the poor , implying that because they are poor, they must be drug addicts. However, individuals that support the law, express that the plan being put in effect is to ensure that tax payer’s money isn’t being thrown away on people who only plan to abuse this assistance.... [tags: constitution, addicts, tax-payers]
571 words (1.6 pages)
- ... People would feel differently about the drug testing for welfare if there was suspicion suspected before doing the test. Drug testing for welfare would be a smart and effective way to help satisfy the people who completely disagree with welfare for various reasons, but particularly those who worry that welfare may be using hard earned money to perpetuate not only one person’s drug habit, but an entire drug business in their own towns. Many people feel that they are working hard just so people can take the easy way out in life when it comes to the idea of the program to begin with, let alone once the suspicion of drug use comes into play.... [tags: unconstitutional, pros and cons]
1383 words (4 pages)
- Anyone that gets a pay check form their place of work, pays taxes. Where do these large amounts of money from our pay checks go. How is the money being spent. Well if you weren’t already aware, a portion of the tax's go toward the welfare program. Welfare is defined as financial assistance to impoverished Americans which is supplied through the taxes paid by the working class ( Applying For Welfare). As a more clear understanding welfare is a government system that distributes support in various ways to low income citizens or those that have no source of income.... [tags: Govenment, Economy, Income]
940 words (2.7 pages)
- Taking English Class During Summer
- How Governments Can Foster Entrepreneurship And Encourage The Creation Of Wealth
- Swot Analysis : Customer Service
- The Legalization Of Doctor Assisted Suicide
- Adult Sex : Male And Race : Caucasian. Chief Complaint / Reason For Admission
- The Effects Of Violent Video Games On Children