When analyzing Hobbes case for justice, one must first establish the conditions where justice can even begin to exist at all. To get to that point we have to define what Hobbes believes is all of mankind 's first inclination, that of power. Power for Hobbes is the ability for an individual to obtain “future apparent good”(150). Since Hobbes prescribes to the notion that there is no clear distinction of right and wrong or good and bad, morality is completely relative to the individuals desires at that moment and what he believes is in his best interest for survival.(120) This allows for an individual to pursue power for what he believes is good but may actually turnout to be bad in the long run. This pursuit of “power after power, that ceaseth only in death”(161) establishes the conditions that places mankind in endless war and conflict, this is mere nature.
For Hobbes mere nature comes first and “each man uses his own power...for the preservation of ...his own life”(189). There is no justice when humans are living in the state of mere nature in “this war of every man against every man...nothing can be unjust. The...
... middle of paper ...
...ting laws and executing justice only for their own benefit and self interest, unfortunately yes. However as it becomes apparent to more and more people that the sovereign is not truly protecting the inalienable rights of individuals, that particular sovereigns days will be numbered. In the end the effectual truth holds that in the long term you are more likely to create a stable system by implementing a sovereign that has the protection of individual liberties at the heart of its convention of justice. By doing this you can maintain the necessary balance between liberty and authority, thus ensuring that peace can be adequately pursued at all costs. Justice is mankinds vehicle to peace, the road is tough and arduous but the potential significance of every man and woman living in harmony without war is an endeavor worth taking on, and only Justice can get us there.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Although Hobbes has created a logical response to the Fool, I have some objections to his argument. According to Hobbes, every man has the right to self-preservation and are permitted to do whatever it takes to hold that right. This also means that the world’s worst criminal could reasonably refuse punishment. That person could escape imprisonment, lie under oath while in court, or commit theft and he or she could argue that it was all necessary for their self-preservation. Strictly speaking, this means anything one does could be deemed as necessary for his or her self-preservation and it could never be considered unjust or unreasonable.... [tags: Soul, Plato, Philosophy, Justice]
1004 words (2.9 pages)
- Hobbes' First Three Laws of Nature and the Fool's Objection Thomas Hobbes begins The Leviathan by establishing the idea that all men are created equal, although every man perceives himself as smarter than the next. As Hobbes says: "[men] will hardly believe there are many so wise as themselves; for they see their own wit at hand, and other men's at a distance" (25). He then argues for psychological egoism, describing mankind as driven by self-interest and, ultimately, only self-interest. This leads mankind to a constant state of war where human beings will pit themselves against each other in competition because "if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enj... [tags: Thomas Hobbes' Philosophy]
1155 words (3.3 pages)
- The Justice of Democracy Why was Socrates the renowned Philosopher put to death, was it based on his political and spiritual beliefs or because he taught his beliefs to his students. He believed that he was in a private pursuit of truth, a search for wisdom. He turned the youth against the Gods of Athens, proposing that the opinions of experts were the only pertinent opinions. Socrates never voiced his concerns or chose to leave the society that had supported him for some seventy years of his life.... [tags: Papers]
793 words (2.3 pages)
- “Equal justice under law”. Those four words are engraved on the very face of the Supreme Court building in Washington D.C. This phrase essentially means that everyone is to be treated equally and judged fairly. And yet, even with that phrase engraved on the outside of the Supreme Court building, many people are not treated fairly due to a certain policy regarding cameras inside of courtrooms. It is understood that all American citizens should have access to the goings on inside a courtroom but this is sadly not true.... [tags: Justice]
1596 words (4.6 pages)
- One of the main concepts in both Plato's Republic and Hobbes' Leviathan is justice. For Plato, the goal of his Republic is to discover what justice is and to demonstrate that it is better than injustice. Plato does this by explaining justice in two different ways: through a city or polis and through an individual human beings soul. He uses justice in a city to reveal justice in an individual. For Hobbes, the term justice is used to explain the relationship between morality and self-interest. Hobbes explains justice in relation to obligations and self-preservation.... [tags: Politics Philosophy Sociology]
2781 words (7.9 pages)
- Each day throughout our world, medical professionals suction thousands of babies from their mothers’ wombs through a procedure called abortion. The law protects and provides consent to both the mother and the medical professionals for these procedures. However, the babies seemingly have no right to protection or life themselves because of the argument regarding when a fetus is determined be human and have life. Pro-life author, Sarah Terzo, in a LifeSiteNews.com article, relays the following testimony supporting this from a medical student upon witnessing his first abortion, “Rejected by their mothers and regarded as medical waste by their killers, society allows these babies to die silently... [tags: Argument Against Abortion]
2133 words (6.1 pages)
- Midterm Philosophy Paper Glaucon’s continuation of Thrasyamachus’s argument against “justice” is broken down into three parts in which he described that his argument will make an attack on different points. First, he began by asking the questions of “what sort of thing people claim justice is” and “where they say it comes from”. Second, he went on to note that “everyone who pursues it pursues it unwillingly as something necessary but not good”. Finally, he articulated that “people do it fittingly since the life of someone who’s unjust is much better than that of someone who’s just as they say”.... [tags: Soul, Plato, Justice, JUSTICE]
2259 words (6.5 pages)
- Argument Against Nozick’s Distributive Justice Robert Nozick argues in his Entitlement Theory that there are three main topics in the justice of holdings: the acquisition of ‘un-held things’, the transfer of holdings, and the rectification of injustice in holdings.1 Nozick’s theory of what makes a transfer of holdings ‘just’ should be rejected for two key reasons and the rectification of injustice of holdings should be rejected for two key reasons. Robert Nozick declares a transfer of holdings just if the exchange is voluntary and if the holding being exchanged was originally acquired by just means.2 The first key point of this argument that should be rejected is the fact that the grounds... [tags: Law]
880 words (2.5 pages)
- Euthanasia is a Greek word which means, gentle and easy death. However, it is the other way around. It is not a gentle or easy death because there is not a type of death which can called gentle in the world. According to Ian Dowbiggin, in Ancient Greece people used euthanasia without patient's permission. It means that, in Ancient Greece they did not care about the voluntariness. Also, there are just few doctors who adjust themselves according to the Hippocratic Oath. (250 pp.) After coming of Christianity, church learnt how evil suicide was and they told people killing another person or themselves was a brutal behavior.... [tags: Argument Against Assisted Suicide]
1204 words (3.4 pages)
- Should the mere fact that criminals committing crimes with the use of guns infringe the national right of the innocent to possess guns. This is a question that arouses everywhere and no matter which way it is viewed the controversy will always go on. "A gun is a mere tool that can be used for good or evil. Our country is based on the belief that man is good until he or she is proven to be otherwise."(Harris p.2) This means that only a few people are committing crimes with uses of guns and why completely remove them from society.... [tags: Argument Against Gun Control]
965 words (2.8 pages)
- Why We Should Make The Most Of Time With Other People
- Post Traumatic Stress Disorder ( Ptsd )
- The Pearl Is The Eternal Reminder Of Hester 's Shame
- The Moroccan System
- Harold Washington College The Fifth Oldest Of Seven City Colleges
- Evaluation Of An Effective Rehabilitation Program For Reducing Recidivism Without Compromising Officer Or Offender Safety