A major argument supporting capital punishment is that it would help to prevent future crimes - specifically, murder. This would require the criminal to think about the consequences to their crime or even care. This makes the assumption that the killer before the crime was capable of making that judgment. Whether or not a murder or crime is premeditated, there have been studies conducted that can make us question how much the death penalty actually serves as a deterrent to crime. In 1989, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee said that if we look at other Western democracies, "Not one of those countries has capital punishment for peacetime crimes, and yet every one of them has a murder rate less than half that of the United States" (Information, "Capital Punishment" 110). Saying that that crime is deterred by the death penalty cannot be backed up with evidence.
The subject of innocence also weighs on whether or not the death penalty should be used. By law criminals are supposed to be "innocent until proven guilty", but most of the time they are often "guilty until proven innocent". People are biased; more likely than not if you’re accused than that is what is going to stick in the minds of people. And the legal system is not always true or accurate. Innocent people are conv...
... middle of paper ...
... it. Eknath Easwaran quotes Gandhi as saying, "Violence can never bring an end to violence; all it can do is provoke more violence" ("Gandhi" 49). If saying that killing is wrong and because of that the killer needs to hold accountability, to say that the killer needs to be killed is completely hypocritical. I agree that in some cases the person is so vile that they might deserve it but if you are trying to up hold the standard that killing is wrong then to take the life of the killer would just take you in a never ending loop.
There are those who people believe deserve the death penalty and maybe they do but it cannot be justified. The cost of jail without parole is cheaper than trying for the death penalty, the chance of killing someone innocent is always there, and for most it is not morally right. These are all reasons that the death penalty should not be used.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Welcome to America, the land of the free, of the prosperous, of the opulent. America the Beautiful, one of the only places in the world where all citizens regardless of race, background, or social class are constitutionally guaranteed life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—that is unless you're on death row. In modern day America we are still faced with the antiquated ritual of capital punishment, a practice that interferes directly with the law of the land. The same forms of punishment used during the middle ages are still in effect today, the same ideas that should have been abolished had the U.S.... [tags: Anti Death Penalty Essays]
1099 words (3.1 pages)
- Protected under the Constitution, “No person shall be deprived of his or her LIFE, liberty, and property under Due Process of law.” These fundamental rights, primarily LIFE, apply to capital punishment- the death penalty. For years, the Court has deliberated decisions in regards to the death penalty and countless times they have overthrown previous decisions. This in no way means laws, under the Constitution, have changed; however, the Court and our interpretation(s) of the law have changed. In Furman V.... [tags: Anti Death Penalty Essays]
1244 words (3.6 pages)
- The Death Penalty does not promote retribution, reconciliation, or rehabilitation; instead it fuels revenge and thus, it should be put to death. The Death Penalty is as old as humanity. Over the years executions were carried out by hanging, crucifixion, boiling until dead, firing squad, drowning, beheading, and lethal injections. It is viewed as a way to discourage crime and free mankind from dangerous criminals. An important fact to note is in Europe in the middle Ages as well here in America, the social status of a condemned person often influenced was the individual was executed.... [tags: Violation of Rights]
772 words (2.2 pages)
- A Non-Pacifist Argument Against Capital Punishment ABSTRACT: In this paper I present a moral argument against capital punishment that does not depend upon the claim that all killing is immoral. The argument is directed primarily against non-philosophers in the Judeo-Christian tradition. Oddly, the moral argument against capital punishment has not been effective in the United States despite the biblical injunction against killing. Religious supporters of the death penalty often invoke a presumed distinction between ‘killing’ and ‘murdering’ and avow that God forbade the latter but not the former.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Papers]
2773 words (7.9 pages)
- Argumentative Essay on Capital Punishment in Australia Capital punishment is barbaric and inhumane and should not be re-introduced into Australia. Although capital punishment has been abolished, the debate on this topic has never abated. When a particularly heinous crime is committed, this debate arouses strong passions on both sides. Many who advocate the abolition of capital punishment consider the death penalty to be cruel and inhuman, while those who favor of punishment by death see it as a form of just retribution for the gravest of crimes.... [tags: Persuasive Essays, Argumentative Essay]
2208 words (6.3 pages)
- Capital punishment is the punishment of death for a crime given by the state. It is used for a variety of crimes such as murder, drug trafficking and treason. Many countries also have the death penalty for sexual crimes such as rape, incest and adultery. The lethal injection, the electric chair, hanging and stoning are all methods of execution used throughout the world. Capital punishment has been around since ancient times; it was used in ancient Rome, and one of the most famous people to be crucified was Jesus Christ.... [tags: Argument Against Death Penalty]
869 words (2.5 pages)
- Should murderers and rapist be given the death penalty. Should you kill someone because they killed another. If you’re for or against capital punishment we can all agree that, one who commits a crime should be punished. Picking a side for capital punishment is a hard one because no one case is the same as the last one. Convection someone to capital punishment would cost more than just sending them to prison “One Ohio trial judge estimates a death penalty trial will cost 3-4 times as much as life-without-parole trail.” Study also shows that death penalty costs average as much as $10 million more per year per state than life sentence costs.... [tags: Argument Against Death Penalty]
909 words (2.6 pages)
- "What says the law. You will not kill. How does it say it. By killing!" -Victor Hugo, author of Les Misérables Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the practice of killing criminals or accused criminals (Issitt, Micha L.Newton, Heather.) In most Western countries still using this practice, death by lethal injection is most common(“Forms of Execution in the United States”) and in the United States federal capital punishment is mostly used in cases of first degree murder or murder in which the killer meant and planned to kill the victim or victims, but is also used for espionage and treason(Federal Laws Providing for the Death Penalty.) Many other Western countries have ban... [tags: Argument Against Death Penalty]
1873 words (5.4 pages)
- The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is exactly how it sounds. The convicted is sentence to death because of the heinous crimes they have committed by the legal process. “Most death penalty cases involve the execution of murderers although capital punishment can also be applied for treason, espionage, and other crimes” (ProCon, 2014, para1). The eighth amendment protects people from excessive bail, excessive fines imposed, or cruel and unusual punishments. The courts would have to find the death sentence to be proportional to the crime they had committed.... [tags: Argument Against Death Penalty]
1254 words (3.6 pages)
- The debate over capital punishment in the criminal justice system is intense Capital punishment is the killing of someone authorized by law for committing a heinous crime. It is currently practiced in thirty-two states. While both sides have a valid viewpoint concerning this issue, the bottom line is that capital punishment is not a deterrent to heinous crimes committed throughout the United States. Factors such as race and socioeconomic status also affect the outcome of the person who committed the crime.... [tags: Argument Against Death Penalty]
1398 words (4 pages)