A theist could try to form a counter-argument, without trying to infer that God lacks at least one of these traits, by answering that the evil we see is necessary for some greater purpose. It could be meant to learn a lesson or is actually the result of our own choices. There is a quote by Santayana that said “those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it” (The Santayana). Another thing is that in order for good to exist, evil must exist as well. You cannot just have one without the other. There are two distinctions within ‘necessary evil.’ They are known as natural and moral evil. Moral evil is closely linked with free will. By giving humans and other creatures free will, God is allowing us, to a certain extent, conduct our own destiny even though it might have less than favorable consequences. God is omitted from knowing the outcome of events because omniscience cannot fall under this line of discussion. He cann...
... middle of paper ...
...o more difficult for a theist to answer, I do think that they could give an answer. The reason the universe seems so fragile could be that this is the one instance where he did succeed in creating the perfect conditions in order for there to be life. And what is to say the universe as fragile as Philo claimed? Everything that is present seems to be working cohesively and the organisms that do not, simply go extinct.
The argument from evil is a tricky debate simply because both sides have multiple components to cipher through. On one side, it says that the universe does not reach the standard it would be if the traditional God existed. On the other side, it is said that this universe is indeed perfect and every misgiving is meant to be better in the long run. Whatever the case may be, the opinion will vary depending on the person’s personal beliefs or lack thereof.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The argument from evil for the non-existence of God has been a widely disputed question in religious philosophical debate. This question is trying to explain how a traditional God allows for certain evil in the world to occur when he has the ability, knowledge, and capacity to stop these events from occurring. But in order to go into depth about this particular argument, the first thing is identifying what traits a traditional God is supposed to have. A ‘traditional’ monotheistic God, such as the one found in the Judeo-Christian religion, is supposed to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent.... [tags: Evidential Arguments from Evil]
1200 words (3.4 pages)
- ... As an agnostic, Ehrman represents the agnostic perspective. To address the mystery of evil, it is important to address this viewpoint as agnosticism does not effectively handle the question of the mystery of evil. There is an understandably stout yearning in almost all humans, despite their beliefs, to hope that pain and misery has definitive purpose, especially a purpose that makes sense in the context of our own existence. The desire to place suffering with purpose has repeatedly lead cultures to seek out and worship gods (or the God) in return for safekeeping in times of calamity.... [tags: god, creator, evil, gives, takes]
1455 words (4.2 pages)
- Introduction One of the oldest dilemmas in philosophy is also one of the greatest threats to Christian theology. The problem of evil simultaneously perplexes the world’s greatest minds and yet remains palpably close to the hearts of the most common people. If God is good, then why is there evil. The following essay describes the problem of evil in relation to God, examines Christian responses to the problem, and concludes the existence of God and the existence of evil are fully compatible. Body “The problem of evil is often divided between the logical and evidential problems.” At the heart of each problem is the belief that the existence of God and the existence evil are incompatible.... [tags: God and Evil are Compatible]
2238 words (6.4 pages)
- God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent, which makes us wonder what kind of morally sufficient reason justifies God to allow evil. We know that evil exists in our world, but so does God, so would God be the source of evil as well as good. We have established that God is the omnipotent and benevolent free creator of the world, but suffering and evil exist. Is God unable to prevent evil. If so, he would not be omnipotent. Is He able to prevent the evil in our world but unwilling. If this were then case then he wouldn’t be benevolent.... [tags: God, Moral evil, natural evil]
1275 words (3.6 pages)
- In the Confessions, Augustine wrote about his struggle with understanding how evil exists in a world created by God. He questioned how it was possible and why God allows evil in his creations because God is supremely good. After delving into finding a solution, Augustine concluded that evil does not exist, and the things deemed as evil are caused by free will. This paper will argue that Augustine has successfully proven that evil does not exist by explaining his earlier explanation of the origin of evil taught by the Manicheans, explaining Augustine’s teachings, and finally, using the textual descriptions of Augustine’s unwillingness to convert as support for his conclusion.... [tags: evil, creations, free will]
783 words (2.2 pages)
- In the beginning, God created the world. He created the earth, air, stars, trees and mortal animals, heaven above, the angels, every spiritual being. God looked at these things and said that they were good. However, if all that God created was good, from where does un-good come. How did evil creep into the universal picture. In Book VII of his Confessions, St. Augustine reflects on the existence of evil and the theological problem it poses. For evil to exist, the Creator God must have granted it existence.... [tags: God, Creation, Evil]
899 words (2.6 pages)
- All moral arguments for the existence of God work on the principle that we all have a shared sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, broadly speaking, humans worldwide have a vague idea of what is right and what is wrong; a moral argument for the existence of God would say that this mutual understanding is proof of God's existence. Immanuel Kant put forward this argument (although, not a moral argument); God as the source of objective morality. Firstly, he addressed the categorical imperative; our own sense of duty, and that being moral was case of following this principle, for example, paying your debts.... [tags: Religion Argument Analysis]
1604 words (4.6 pages)
- Mackie in his paper Evil and Omnipotence, constructs an argument against the idea of the possibility of a God existing that has the characteristics laid out by the main religions: Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. These characteristics include that God is omnipotent, or He is capable of stopping evil, and omni benevolent, or He wants to eliminate evil and He is entirely good. Mackie systematically goes through his logical thought process as well as his response to any type of criticism or alternative solution that might arise.... [tags: Atheism Religion Argument]
1968 words (5.6 pages)
- The Argument of Evil for the Existence of God One of the major arguments proposed against the existence of God in contemporary western philosophy is the problem of evil. It is based upon the inability to reconcile the magnitude of evil in the world with the all-loving nature of God. John Hick describes the problem from the perspective of its proponent, "If God is perfectly loving, God must wish to abolish all evil; and if God is all-powerful, God must be able to abolish all evil. But evil exists; therefore God cannot be both omnipotent and perfectly loving." This thus causes difficulty for the Judeo-Christian-Islamic God who possess both qualities of being all-loving and omnipotent.... [tags: Papers]
677 words (1.9 pages)
- J.L. Mackie's "Evil and Omnipotence" The philosopher J.L. Mackie wrote a very convincing piece on the problem of evil called “Evil and Omnipotence,” in which he attempts to show that one of the following premises must be false in order for them to be consistent with each other. #1. God is omnipotent. #2. God is morally perfect. #3. Evil exists. The problem of evil is a deductive a priori argument who’s goal is to prove the non-existence of God. In addition to Mackie’s three main premises he also introduces some “quasi-logical” rules that give further evidence to his argument.... [tags: Philosophy Philosophical Evil Mackie Essays]
1664 words (4.8 pages)