Areas of Control and Interest in the Application of Integrity and Ethics in Research Done by Ph.D Students

Areas of Control and Interest in the Application of Integrity and Ethics in Research Done by Ph.D Students

Length: 1326 words (3.8 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Strong Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

Research, doctoral or otherwise, is essential in all disciplines in order to continue to progress in the field and to improve practices. However, researchers must take care of conducting their research with the outmost care, following strict ethical principles and with integrity. Northcentral University holds its students to the upmost standards in ethical and professional practices in order to prepare the student for publishable scholarly writing. The question of ethical practices and integrity in research has been in place for centuries. However, violations s still occur, which is why it is important that researchers at all levels continue to discuss and learn about the topic and keep it in the forefront of any research endeavor. The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss specific areas of concern and interest in the application of integrity and ethics into research conducted by doctoral students.
Literature Review
All research must be conducted in an ethical and morally responsible manner. While the statement may seem logical and of common sense, there have been serious violations in the past that have caused a closer look at consequences and a need for regulations. For this reason, there are printed guidelines that apply to students, scholars and professionals alike (Ehrich, Cranston, Kimber, & Starr, 2012). The primary reasons that the guidelines exist are to protect the rights, privacy, dignity, well-being, and intellectual property of individuals who may participate directly or indirectly in a study, as well as to protect the researcher. Additionally, scientific research is founded on a trusting relationship between the scientific community (researchers) and the general public. When ethical an...

... middle of paper ...

...istration & Management (CCEAM)), 40(2), 99-114.

Evering, L., & Moorman, G. (2012). Rethinking Plagiarism in the Digital Age. Journal Of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(1), 35-44. doi:10.1002/JAAL.00100

Estow, S., Lawrence, E. K., & Adams, K. A. (2011). Practice Makes Perfect: Improving Students' Skills in Understanding and Avoiding Plagiarism With a Themed Methods Course. Teaching Of Psychology, 38(4), 255-258. doi:10.1177/0098628311421323

Franke, A., & Arvidsson, B. (2011). Research supervisors' different ways of experiencing supervision of doctoral students. Studies In Higher Education, 36(1), 7-19. doi:10.1080/03075070903402151

Shamim, F. and Qureshi, R., (2013) Informed consent in educational research in the South: tensions and accommodations, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43:4, 464-482, DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2013.797729

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »