Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elucidate the ethical theory of Deontological Ethics
theories and principles of ethics
Elucidate the ethical theory of Deontological Ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elucidate the ethical theory of Deontological Ethics
Parents often think they are feeding their children healthier options, but what they do not realize is that the flavoring in foods is often made from highly refined chemicals and the sweetness they taste is actually sugar. Many of the pre-packaged foods, such as muffin mixes, contain chemicals designed to taste like the real thing, and have no nutritional value. Often, flavored drinks are high in these chemicals and sugars to make them taste good. The other common misconception that parents make, is that products are made from healthy ingredients because the label says it contains it on the package. The major problem with this is the amount of the healthy ingredients are minimal and gives no nutritional value.
Food manufacturers have started
…show more content…
First, we will view it from the manufactures perspective; the Deontology theory. According to Business Ethics: A Managerial Approach, "Deontology maintains there are certain standards of human decency and respect for the worth of others that rule out treating them in certain ways" (Wicks, Freeman, Werhane, Martin, 2010, p.6).
The manufacturers justify their actions because their goal is to sell their product, no matter what the effects of it are on the consumers who purchase the product. Because actions are viewed as having essentially good and bad qualities, we need to understand where the manufacturer’s styles of thinking come from. The manufactures intent or action is to market their product in order to make a profit. Deontologist view their rights or wrongs based on the action not the outcome of the action. So, unless they are breaking the law, the manufacturer does not see anything wrong with their marketing
…show more content…
According to Business Ethics: A Managerial Approach, “consequentialism focuses on the moral importance of the ends we seek, or the goals we set, and the need to achieve them through our actions” (Wicks, et al., 2010, p. 7). The manufactures have a goal of marketing their products in order to obtain customers who will purchase their product. The actions the manufactures choose are benefiting their business in order to achieve the goals they desire. Consequentialist believe that if their “actions create more good than bad in terms of realizing their goals or purpose” (Wicks, et al., 2010, p. 7). It does not matter to the manufacture if the consumer has an allergy to an ingredient that may be in their product, but they have listed it under another name.
Consumer’s believe they have the right to know what they are putting into their body’s and that the label on the product will inform them of that information. When they find out the truth about food label misconceptions it breaks their trust for those manufactures. view of
Companies nowadays are using different and strong methods in marketing their food products. The Companies are very competitive, and the results can affect the people. When we think about this job field, it is convincing that those producers should use cleverly ways to gain their own living. In the other side they shouldn’t use misleading ways that could harm the people. Food companies should be straightforward with every marketing method they use. People have the right to know what they are consuming and also to know the effects of these products on them, whether it is harmful, useful, or even neutral.
Just like the kid that buys a sugary cereal just because it has Spongebob Squarepants on it, or like the person that goes to Disneyland to have fun but at end of that day, they can buy a churro. Parents also need to take a action in this too, just because you kid gives you a temper tantrum doesn’t mean that you need to buy them the candy they want in order for them to stop crying, and parents should also be informed of the things that their kids are consuming at their schools. Food companies should market or promote the TINY WORDS on the back of their product that informs all of the substances they used to make the product, to the consumer. Just like they would promote their food products to get consumers. Think about these following questions: What will you do to be informed of the chemicals used on the products you and your family consumes? Is it worth buying just because it has your favorite characters, movie, or games on
The book Salt, Sugar, and Fat: How the Food Giants Hooked Us discusses the danger of food with its readers. The dangers of food discussed in the book are the ingredients of Salt, Sugar and Fat in the food individuals consume on a daily basis. Producers use these ingredients to their advantage to get the consumers bliss point. The bliss point attained is used by the food giants to achieve a profit. However due to research on the health risks of these ingredients food companies are strategizing in order to maintain their profit and earn more of a profit.
By accepting misguided information about the food that is being purchased from the marketers, consumers are letting the food industry shape buying patterns, even when it is not to their benefit. Pollan supports this claim when he writes, “With all the variety and constant stream of messages from the food industry and media, how can we make up our minds” (86). Pollan’s quote elaborates on how the the constant stream of messages affects what Americans put into their bodies.
In Lee Ann Fisher Baron’s “Junk Science,” she claims that the “food industry with the help of federal regulators” sometimes use “[a science that] bypasses [the] system of peer review. Presented directly to the public by…‘experts’ or ‘activists,’ often with little or no supporting evidence, this ‘junk science’ undermines the ability…[for] everyday consumers to make rational decisions” (921). Yet Americans still have a lot of faith in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to a 2013 Pew Research study, 65% of Americans are “very favorable” or “mostly favorable” of the FDA. When it comes to what people put in their bodies, the FDA has a moral obligation to be truthful and transparent. The bottom line of the FDA’s myriad of responsibilities is to help protect the health of Americans. Deciding what to eat is a critical part of living healthily, and consumers must be able to trust that this massive government agency is informing them properly of the contents of food. While the FDA does an excellent job in many areas, it has flaws in other areas. One of its flaws is allowing the food industry to print food labels that are deceptive, unclear, or simply not true (known as misbranding). This is quite the hot topic because a Google search for “Should I trust food labels” returns well over 20 million results, many of which are blog posts from online writers begging their readers not to trust food labels. HowStuffWorks, a division of Discovery Communications, published an online article whose author claims that “[the food industry] will put what they want on labels. They know the game….” While the food industry is partially at blame for misbranding, the FDA is allowing it to happen. If a mother tells her children that it is oka...
...n when the manufacturer goes to great length to warn consumers against possible hazards of the product, these warnings are not always sufficient protection from failure-to-warn lawsuits. The manner in which each lawsuit is defended against can also provide a deterrent against such suits in the future.
Within the last several years, there has been a dramatic increase in food-related litigation challenging labels on products as misleading and deceptive. In particular, today’s growing numbers of class actions suits are accusing companies of making false claims regarding the nutritional content of its products.
You know the sayings, “you are what you eat” and “abs are made in the gym and revealed in the kitchen?” Well, it’s difficult for people to realize what they are truly eating, or cooking up in the kitchen, if they don’t understand how their food is produced. Many of the so-called “healthy foods” at local grocery stores are nutritionally deficient and full of chemicals, pesticides, and additives that disrupt your hormonal balance. Even though corporations and lobbyists don't want consumers knowing what's in their food or how their food is produced, we need more transparent foods labels so people know what they are putting in their bodies. As a customer you’re paying for this product. Therefore, you have the right to know if it’s a good long-term investment.
Food claims seemed to be marketing for a manufacturer, but now it is a warning to a consumer's health. Some examples of claims are "low-fat", "lite", "light", "reduced", "%fat free" and "No added". The food industry is very keen to make health claims on food labels, and the ANZFA has considered lifting the ban that stops them from doing so. Many disagreeable claims are made regarding the ability of nutrients to prevent certain diseases. Food manufacturers are now only allowed to make the following well-established claims concerning relationships between diet and disease:
Daily, millions of people are perusing the grocery store, buying food for their families, completely unaware of what they are purchasing. A study on consumer research regarding food labels by the FDA found only a small percentage of people actually read the food labels and understand what they mean apart from only the calories and fat; ingredients are another story. “According to a study published in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, about 61.5 percent reported using the nutrition facts panel when deciding to purchase food. Fewer people paid attention to the list of ingredients” (CNN Health). The FDA is aware that labeling could help reverse the acceleration we are seeing in heart diseases and obesity, but labeling does not help people to read the ingredients if they do not understand pseudonyms, and vitamins. “The surveys also revealed frequent misunderstanding of the meaning of the daily/value column that shows how each nutrient fits into a healthy diet, “(American journal Nutrition, WEB). Many different harmful ingredients are secretly hidden in labels and people skimming ov...
In a sales environment, image is everything. If the news were to spread, real or not, of whether their fertilizer causes death in animals, it could hurt the company. By conducting a thorough investigation into the claim, the company will be able to prove that they care about the health and happiness of their customers, even if the product is not the cause of animal deaths. More importantly, if the claim turns out to be true upon investigation, the company would be able to act swiftly in removing the hazardous fertilizer from being sold and then seek out a safer product to
Marketing is a system of business activates designed to plan, price, promote and distribute want-satisfying products, services and ideas to customers in order to achieve business objectives. Consumer law protects consumer’s rights in the marketplace as well as fair trading, competition and accurate information. On the other hand, ethical aspects of marketing are about making marketing decisions that are morally right. However, consumer law and ethical aspects of marketing have a lot of advantages and disadvantages in the marketplace, which impacts business 's sales and growth like it happened to: Harvey Norman, Nurofen, apple, etc.
Marketing, intellectual property, and product safety regulation are filled with ethical issues and potential dilemmas that all companies must deal with. PharmaCARE must also consider its actions regarding their use of U.S. copyright law for the drugs it makes, as well as its treatment of its workers. The company needs to decides if it wants to live up to its own brand, or simply go after profits.
More and More people are becoming concerned about what they eat, especially if they consume food products that are manufactured in food industries. However, it is hard to know what exactly you are consuming if food industries provide false nutrition content and mislead consumers by placing false advertisements on the packaging. When a company produces a product that contains misleading label, consumers are not receiving complete information about the food they are eating which could lead to health issues including allergies and problems with diabetes.
Food labels are supposed to tell us exactly what’s in the foods we consume but we don’t know where those things come from. I think that food labels should state exactly where and what companies provided the ingredients in the foods on the food labels. If we knew exactly what we were eating we could prevent each other from getting sick from the foods. The government will never release exactly what we are eating because they’re are gaining too much money when they keep things kept a secret but; too many people are getting sick from these foods we need to be able to prevent ourselves from getting