Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
In wars
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: In wars
"I'll treat people nicer. In Iraq, I would meet people, and the next day they wouldn't be there,” quoted Army Reserve Major Alicea.
"I talk to a lot of the guys, and it's hard for us to adapt. The noises scare us. The nightmares we have problems with. We have anger issues. For me, it's hard to hold a job. It's hard on your family. My dad says he can look into a GI's eyes, and he can tell who's been over there," stated Army Reserve Sergeant Christensen.
Both Major Alicea and Sergeant Christensen served in the Iraq War. Their statements above are from a compilation of quotes, stated by soldiers, in an article conducted by The Washington Post. These quotes give an insight into the lives’ of soldiers during and after war. The quotes have a depth in them that not everyone can fully comprehend. It would be a lie for people, other than soldiers, to admit to feeling the way these soldiers feel every single day.
Personal principles exist in war. There’s no way it could not exist, especially in an environment as cruel, painful, and disheartening as war. Every single person has a moral compass. It doesn’t matter which way it is pointing or whether or not the person will admit they have one, it is there. Everyone has a sense of what is right and what is wrong. So the question isn’t whether or not personal principles exist in war, it is whether or not to suspend one’s personal morals in a situation such as war.
The answer to the question stated above is complicated and complex because there are extenuating circumstances in every situation. Medal of Honor recipient, Marine Corporal Jason Dunham, would most likely state the fact he would not suspend his personal morals in war. Corporal Dunham was killed in Iraq in April of 2004. Dunha...
... middle of paper ...
... suspended their personal morals in order to do what they had to do.
All of these examples show how personal principles exist in war. There is no way of avoiding feelings. There is no way of setting aside right and wrong. But even though one’s conscious speaks, doesn’t mean one always listens. Sometimes one does listen and the reward is remarkable. But other times, one doesn’t listen and a price is paid. The point is this; though sometimes personal morals should be suspended in war, to result in greater good, morals cannot always be turned on and turned off with a simple click. Some have the ability to contemplate quickly and decide what to do in a hostile environment, but others do not. The problem is not whether morals should be suspended; the problem is the consequence of suspending or not suspending morals, and sadly, there is a price that is paid for both.
Take Lieutenant Jimmy Cross, for example. Although he had no desire to be in Vietnam, not to mention be leading troops there, it is evident that he is selfless in the pursuit of the war, and genuinely concerned about the welfare of his men. Unfortunately, he is blinded by guilt to these qualities.
There is an obvious need to ensure that all soldiers act according to military orders rather than their own personal political motivations. At times, the military’s need to protect military order supersedes a soldier’s right to political speech. There is a delicate balance between protecting military interests and a soldier’s right to freedom of speech. Interests of the military, including protecting national security, promoting order and discipline within the military, and safeguarding military secrets must be balanced with a soldier’s right to tell his or her story and the public’s right to know the truth about the war on terror.
This book has not changed my views on ethics in combat nor in garrison. In the many years I have been in the military and the over seven combat deployments, I must disagree with Mr. Couch. Instances of unethical behavior are not encouraged to the degree he thinks nor as widespread. Of course, as with any organization where people are present, there will always be outliers
...ties of the people he serves and continues to develop himself in service of others. As a professional, a soldier lives these words through action.
A true war story is never moral. It does not instruct, nor encourage virtue, nor suggest models of proper human behavior, nor restrain ...
The soldiers from this novel represent actual feelings about brotherhoods, misperceptions of war and the pointless fighting. They provide clear examples of these with their experiences from war. From sitting on their “boxes” and chatting, to the realization of a friend inside an enemy, these soldiers have been able to see the realities of war and have shared it with the rest of the world. People can now see how horrid it is to be in a war and now they try at all costs to prevent war. War is bad, that’s all there is to it. Not much more you can say about it except that. When viewing the death of innocent people, the question is asked once again, is it really worth it?
War has always been an essential ingredient in the development of the human race. As a result of the battles fought in ancient times, up until modern warfare, millions of innocent lives have ended as a result of war crimes committed. In the article, “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience,” Herbert C. Kelman and V.Lee Hamilton shows examples of moral decisions taken by people involved with war-related murders. This article details one of the worse atrocities committed during the Vietnam War in 1968 by the U.S. military: the My Lai Massacre. Through this incident, the question that really calls for psychological analysis is why so many people are willing to formulate , participate in, and condone policies that call for the mass killings of defenseless civilians such as the atrocities committed during the My Lai massacre. What influences these soldiers by applying different psychological theories that have been developed on human behavior.
“The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him.” – G.K Chesterton
You think you know what its like to be over in iraq or afghanistan, but when it comes down to it your simple get up in the morning, brush your teeth, and go out and do your job is far from reality. Oliver ______, [give us both first and last name (or tell us why you couldn’t) rank or expertise (tells the reader why their story is credible or why they are an excellent witness), explained "the Afghans didn't really give a shit about how we were treated or what was given to us for sleep and rest," Oliver recalled. theres times when you go over 3 days without sleeping and they expect you to be functioning right. Oliver was stationed in afghanistan he isn't allowed to give us full details but he gave an outline of what its like going 3 days with no sleep. It was nov. 3rd 2012 Oliver was based to watch over a entrance to the base camp he didn't like doing this but some things you just have to tolerate. He had a 10 hour shift watching this gate his 10 hours was up and was waiting for the next guy to fill in his spot he never showed up he was playing with a string ...
A soldier’s “greatest fear is not death but failure, and the shame that accompanies failure. More than anything else, warriors fear letting themselves down and letting their leaders and friends down at a moment when it matters most. They fear most not losing their lives, but their honor” (Nash, 2007, p. 25).
Cultures vary depending on the extent to which they build virtues based on all the five foundations. Therefore, the liberals who only rely on the two foundations, find it hard to comprehend the moral motivations of the conservatives and therefore the culture of war. To them, the two foundations are all they require to make sound moral judge...
In order for a military to execute its function, every platform of the chain of command must expect and demand obedience to commands (Montrose, 2013), because if this does not happen many lives can be at stake. A simply failure to comply with the orders given can not only jeopardize the lives of the soldiers, it can compromise the safety of all military personnel involved, even in the matter of national security. Utilitarianism has a core theory that some actions may be considered right or wrong relying on the effects of the outcomes. This theory is mostly what could be applied this situation of the detainees in the military prisons. During this time, national security was weak, the country was being attacked and threatened, and thousands of innocent civilians lost their lives. The military could was only looking out for the interest of the country and many interrogation techniques were used to get information that could lead the capture of Al-Qaeda leaders. Soldiers are sent to warzones without the ability to deny their own obligation to war, just because they believe it to be morally wrong. They are sent and receive orders under the assumption the government has all the information needed to make the best decision for the country. According to the periodical, Unjust War and a Soldier’s Moral Dilemma, individual soldiers who have
Kill or be killed by the enemy. When bullets are flying past his face and mortar shells are exploding all around him, he is not mindful of fighting ethically. Nor is he even mindful of fighting for his country. He is fighting for his life. To stay alive, he must kill the enemy, destroy the enemy.
"The core of a soldier is moral discipline. It is intertwined with the discipline of physical and mental achievement. Total discipline overcomes adversity, and physical stamina draws on an inner strength that says drive on." - Former Sergeant Major of the Army William G. Bainbridge
If I am perceived to be a bad soldier, that is the way I will be treated. I will continue to strive to do the right thing and follow the advice of my leaders.