This thread will discuss and analyze the business problem of job dissatisfaction through the application of Core Self-Evaluations and the personality-job fit theory. This work will also offer a spiritual and biblical examination of job dissatisfaction as they relate to the biblical principle of Covenant. Two key elements of Covenant, hesed and mutual accountability will also be examined. Job Dissatisfaction The problem of job dissatisfaction is a global workplace issue. Although Americans are happier in their jobs, satisfaction in the United States is declining due to downsizing and overburdening. (Robbins & Judge, 2009). Before outlining job dissatisfaction a definition of job satisfaction is needed. Job satisfaction is “[an] individuals’ …show more content…
Core self-evaluation is an individual’s belief “in their inner worth and basic competence” (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p. 86). Positive core self-evaluation employees, who appreciate their inner worth and competence, are more likely to derive satisfaction from their work. While employees with negative core self-evaluations often struggle with job dissatisfaction. The issue of job dissatisfaction, as it relates to core self-evaluation should be a concern to managements and organizations. The problems which may accompany job dissatisfaction are numerous and include - workplace deviants, reduced productivity, decreased engagement in organizational citizenship behavior, lower customer service and satisfaction rates, and slightly increased absenteeism and turnover rates (Robbins & Judge, …show more content…
Within Holland’s theory there are six personality types which correspond with a set of occupations. Holland proposed “that [job] satisfaction is highest and turnover is lowest when personality and occupation are in agreement” (Robbins & Judge, 2009, 122). Thus, persons working in jobs which are congruent with their personalities are more likely to have job satisfaction, than persons working in incongruent occupations (Robbins & Judge, 2009). With this information, managers could dramatically increase the job satisfaction of their workforce by placing employees into job opportunities which matched the employee’s personality. If Holland’s theory is correct and the employees are honest on the Vocational Preference Inventory examination then the theory could be an effective tool for decreasing job
From the psychological perspective of its relationship with leadership style, the concept of job satisfaction includes multi-dimensional responses to one’s job, and that such responses have cognitive (evaluative), affective (or emotional), and behavioral components (Judge & Klinger, 2003). Weiss has also argued that job satisfaction is an attitude but points out that researchers should clearly distinguish the objects of cognitive evaluation which are affect (emotion), beliefs and behavior (Weiss, 2002). This concept of job satisfaction suggests that we form attitudes towards our jobs by taking into account our feelings, our beliefs, and our behaviors. The success of any organization depends greatly on the commitment and hard work on the part of their employees. Because of that, job satisfaction has been used as a tool to attract and retain the best employees within the
Employee satisfaction is defined as the extent to which people like (satisfied) or dislike (dissatisfied) their jobs according to Spencer (as cited by Boyad, Lyndon, and Malekar, 2012). This definition suggests that employee satisfaction is a general reaction that individuals hold about their job. In addition, Price (as cited by Appiah, 2016) defined employee satisfaction as a measure of emotions an individual has toward the organization. Thus, Aziri (as cited by Appiah, 2016) inferred that employees are more productive and more stable and display a positive perspective of the objectives of the organization when they are satisfied.
Although there is a detectable relationship between lower levels of job satisfaction and higher turnover rates, the decision to quit one’s job rests on many different factors. Attitudes of an employee towards job satisfaction and organizational commitment play a role, but a shock to the life of an employee
Recruitment becomes a greater challenge in organizations with high turnover due to the increased number of vacancies. Nationwide, only 14% of employees feel satisfied with their jobs (Clawson & Haskins, 2011). This lack of satisfaction can...
Different facets of organizational behavior were addressed in the three articles reviewed for this project. Pay Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intent by Parbudyal Singh and Natasha Loncar examines the relationship between employee position and salary satisfaction and job turnover. The 4 Rs of Motivation by Michael Maccoby suggests a formula from which leaders should pull to motivate subordinates, and Relations Between Leader-Subordinate Personality Similarity and Job Attitudes by Lior Oren, Aharon Tziner, Gil Sharoni, Iafit Amor, and Pini Alon examines the effect the relationship between leaders and subordinates has upon job satisfaction.
The area or subject of Job Satisfaction has always been drawing the practitioners and academicians of Human Resource
Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 17–34.
Job satisfaction and training both are extremely interweaved variables. Job satisfaction is based on evaluation about the level of pleasure an employee is getting from their jobs that contains both of the ingredients demonstrative and reasoning constituents. Job satisfaction can be defined as an assertiveness everybody have about their jobs consequences from the awareness of their job and the notch to which there is a good fit amongst people and organization. Employee job satisfaction denotes to the overall efficiency of their work linked with the practiced that is influenced by the thoughts, belief and worth of the individual. We perceive that many employees are content with their job while some of them are still in doubt.
Based off of the gratification an individual contains towards their work is job satisfaction. The productivity could either be positive or negative while the relationship between the productivity and satisfaction may not be consistent. There are multiple internal and external factors of job satisfaction that can impact the behavior of an employee and engagement over time. The way the worker’s attitude concerning their field effects the performance they perform on a daily basis. One who is satisfied with the job they maintain, succeed at what they do. “It is therefore imperative for a company to understand the attitude of its workers and measure the job satisfaction of its employees, as job satisfaction is essential for productivity” (L. Bradshaw
In many organisations, managers and bosses have found it a struggle implementing successful strategies to improve job satisfaction and productivity among its employees. While dealing with unproductive, unmotivated and unsatisfied employees, there is an increased risk for turnover, which can be prevented. The risk of high turnover is a problem to workplaces as turnover has been proven to ‘take its toll’ on productivity as it disrupts current projects and increases workloads for other employees. It also has a negative impact on team cohesion (Patrick and Sonia, 2012). Job satisfaction is one’s general attitude to the job, and higher the job satisfaction, the more likely he/she will hold a positive attitude towards their job (De Menzes, 2011). De Menzes (2011) believes that employees who are satisfied with their jobs are likely to be more committed to their organisation and be more productive. People are significantly more productive when they are content and achieving individual and organisational goals are able to be fulfilled in a work environment where employees feel happy and motivated. Interventions which can be used to improve job satisfaction and productivity to decrease rates of turnover and unmotivated employees include an increase in workplace training, as well as performance pay.
The purpose of this report is to brief the management on the importance of employee satisfaction in achieving the competitive goals of the organization through increasing the retention of the employees.
Kumar, N. (2012). Relationship of Personal and Organizational Values with Job Satisfaction. Journal of Management Research , 12 (2), 80.
As the relationship between customer satisfaction and employee satisfaction becomes increasingly interrelated. There is substantial evidence in terms of the relationship between customer loyalty, profitability and job satisfaction. The value of the service provided determines the level of satisfaction finally; value is created and determined by satisfied and productive employees. However, it is the internal quality of a working environment that drives employees’ job satisfaction. In service organization, job satisfaction may have impact on customer satisfaction. Job satisfaction is positively related to employee perceptions of service quality. Therefore, job satisfaction in the workplace is a crucial element which deserves a substantial amount of attention for both the well being of the employee and organization. Employee job satisfaction is a worthwhile investment for organizations striving to reduce their employee turnover rate and retain their current
Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences. It has been treated both as a general attitude and satisfaction with five specific dimensions of the job: pay, the work itself, promotion opportunities, supervision, and coworkers. Challenging work, valued rewards, opportunities for advancement, competent supervision, and supportive coworkers are dimensions of the job that can lead to satisfaction (Nelson & Quick, 2013, pg. 58-59).
Job satisfaction is a person’s emotional reaction to aspects of works such as pay, supervision, colleagues, working condition, job security, company policies and support, benefits, promotion and advancement or to the work itself (French, 1990). In other words, job satisfaction is an individual’s emotional reaction to a specific job. Falkenburg and Schyns (2007) indicate that job satisfaction can be studied from different approaches. Job satisfaction can be seen as a result of different behaviours or as a cause of behaviour. Moreover, it can be seen as an overall feeling or involving of some aspects of the job and the work situation together contribute to the feeling of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with work (Johansson, 2010).