Justice In Electra, Apology And The Crito By Sophocre

1457 Words3 Pages

Justice The theme that relates the three books Electra, Apology and the Crito is Justice. Examining the two definitions of Justice that are from each of the three books. Doing this is a way to compare the differences and similarities between each book and more importantly the difference between the different definitions of Justice. The definition that the main character of Electra uses as the definition is Justice is Punishment for unlawfulness with more unlawfulness to satisfy Electra’s own self-interest. The book Electra was written approximately in 450- 440 BC by Sophocles. It is a Greek tragedy that has strong connections to Homer’s Odyssey. The book is biased on the story of Electra and her brother Orestes, they take vengeance in their mother and Clytemnestra and her lover Aegisthus for murdering their father Agamemnon after he returns home from the Trojan War. …show more content…

Specifically looking at what Meletus thought Justice was, see that it is very similar to Electra. “You have made it sufficiently obvious, Meletus, that you have never had any concern for our youth; you show your indifference clearly; that you have given no thought to the subject for which you bring me to trail.” This is Socrates making a defense against the accusations of Metetus. Metetus as rushed into this trial and is guilty of “Irresponsibly bring people to court”. He is angry with Socrates and is trying to get Socrates back for embarrassing him in the streets of Athens. Meletus is trying to get revenge to make himself feel better and prove that Socrates does not know what he is talking about. By doing that he would be proving he is smarter than Socrates, bringing these charges on him are more out of revenge than trying to maintain the law. There it is Metelus’s definition of Justice, retaliation for what happened to make himself feel better. He thinks that he was treated unjustly and wants his

Show More
Related

  • Be Warned and Study Justice:The Shifting Definition of Justice in Virgil’s Aeneid

    4362 Words  | 9 Pages

    Before discussing justice in the epic, it is important to establish the meaning of the term. For our present purpose, justice will specifically apply to the social system of moral checks and balances. Acts that are valued in society are rewarded materially or emotionally. Acts that are devalued lead to punishment. Also, recipients of unmerited punishment receive compensation for their injuries.

    Read More

  • Nature Vs Nurture In Plato's The Republic

    1435 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is his companions, Glaucon and Adeimantus, who revitalized Thrasymachus’ claim of justice. Thrasymachus believes that justice is what the people who are in charge say it is and from that point on it is Socrates’ goal to prove him wrong. Socrates believes that justice is desired for itself and works as a benefit. All four characters would agree that justice has a benefit. To accurately prove his point of justice, Socrates has to reference his own version of nature and nurture. He, Socrates, believes that justice is innately born in everyone. No one person is incapable of being just. Justice is tantamount to a skill or talent. Like any skill or talent, justice must be nurtured so that it is at its peak and mastered form. The city that Socrates has built is perfect in his eyes because every denizen has been gifted with a talent, then properly educated on how best to use their talent, and lastly able to apply their just morals in everyday

    Read More

  • The Apology: Socrates's Views Of The Life

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    Meletus responds by saying the judges, councilors, and members of the Assembly had a major influence on the youth. They possessed expertise and knowledge about the law. Socrates reasons with Meletus by commenting that the Assembly is open to all men of the city. Since he is the only man being put on trial for corrupting the youth, Meletus assumes everyone else benefits the city. Socrates doesn’t believe this and supports his argument with this statement. This whole scenario supports Socrates claim to continue practicing philosophy, while completely disregarding the law. Socrates is honored that the law has been good to him, but he believes he is being treated unjustly according to the law because he is not the only one responsible for corrupting the youth. Once injustice is enacted upon him, he knows that he cannot follow the law anymore. The law is compromised. Socrates tells Crito, “We should not thing so much of what the majority will say about us, but what the person who understands justice and injustice will say” (Crito 5). In this situation at the trial, Socrates believes that the person who understands justice and injustice will agree with him about disobeying the trial’s outcome. He concludes he is not being treated fairly according to the law, compared to other men, and will continue practicing philosophy until he

    Read More

  • Comparing Revenge in Aeschylus' The Oresteia Trilogy and Sophocles' Electra

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    The act of revenge in classical Greek plays and society is a complex issue with unavoidable consequences. In certain instances, it is a more paramount concern than familial ties. When a family member is murdered another family member is expected to seek out and administer revenge. If all parties involved are of the same blood, the revenge is eventually going to wipe out the family. Both Aeschylus, through "The Oresteia Trilogy," and Sophocles, through "Electra," attempt to show the Athenians that revenge is a just act that at times must have no limits on its reach. Orestes and his sister Electra, the children of the slain Agamemnon, struggle on how to avenge their father's death. Although unsure what course of action they must take, both brother and sister are in agreement that revenge must occur. Revenge is a crucial part of Greek plays that gives the characters a sense of honor and their actions a sense of justice.

    Read More

  • Plato's Apology: The Argument For Corrupting The Youth Of Plato

    785 Words  | 2 Pages

    When asked if there’s anyone in the world who would knowingly choose to be harmed, Meletus replies with “Of course not.”, yet he still insists that Socrates intentionally corrupts the youth (p. 56). Socrates knows that those who are wicked will not only cause harm to strangers, but also will cause harm to those who are close to them (p. 56). Socrates is close to those he teaches and does not want to bring harm to himself (p. 56). Therefore, Socrates would never intentionally corrupt the youth (p.56). Socrates goes on to argue that even if he was unwillingly corrupting the youth of Athens, Meletus’ charges would still hold no real value as it would be an involuntary misdemeanor (p. 56).When somebody unknowingly commits a crime they aren’t summoned to court, they are taken aside and made to see the error of their ways (p. 56). So why was Socrates dragged to court? If someone had tried to enlighten Socrates, and had helped him to see that what he was doing was wrong, then he would have stopped doing that which was unintentional (p. 56). Socrates concludes this part of his argument by stating that no one had tried to enlighten him and by once again questioning why he was brought to court, when court is intended for people who need to be punished, not for people who need to be enlightened (p.

    Read More

  • The Tragic Analysis Of Oedipus Rex By Sophocles

    1688 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Oedipus is essentially a tragic analysis. Everything is already there, so it needs only to be extricated.

    Read More

  • According to Socrates, Should you Obey an Unjust Law?

    567 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Apology we find out that Socrates is being indicted by Meletus on the grounds that he i...

    Read More

  • Sophocles vs Euripides

    1219 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sophocles’ and Euripides’ versions of Electra carry, among many similarities, a central theme of revenge. The characters, Electra and Orestes, must reunite to avenge their father’s murder. Misfortunately, in both versions the just solution leads the siblings to destroying their own mother. Both versions of Electra can be compared to Aeschylus’ Libation Bearers. However, they are both more dramatic, and more similar to each other than if each Electra was individually compared to the play by Aeschylus. The biggest differences between the two versions of Electra, are found within the characters and their development. I also believe that, the differences we see in these characters’ personalities between the two plays , contribute to some of the two authors’ variations in the story line.

    Read More

  • Gender Roles In Oresteia By Aeschylus

    1624 Words  | 4 Pages

    In areas where Clytemnestra contrasts Agamemnon (she is strong and demanding and he is arrogant and complacent), Electra strengthens and adds authority to Orestes (encourages him to fulfill the plot against Clytemnestra and Aegisthus). Electra merely provides information for Orestes while Clytemnestra is the brains behind her operation and does her own dirty work. These two women, one bore the other, became such different people. Clytemnestra had this thirst for power hurting any and every one in her way. Meanwhile Electra wanted justice for all who had been harmed by her mother’s selfish ways. Electra helped to accomplish the will of Apollo who took action through Orestes and her own agenda was finished by Orestes as he murdered Clytemnestra and Aegisthus to avenge Agamemnon’s unjust murder.Clytemnestra and Electra are opposite characters who are related but have no similarities. These two women accomplish their own agendas, each leading to their own individual success stories. Unfortunately for one death was imminent but her plan to reign as queen was fulfilled and she needed very little help along the way. The strength that comes from Clytemnestra is uncharacteristic of the times but showed the reader that even in times of timidity for women it was acceptable to a certain degree to be successful and that getting a man’s job done was something women were capable of doing. Electra’s reserved attitude and presence comes from a more accurate portrayal of the Greek Hellenic woman. She obeys her father and she respects and loves her family, most of all she is loyal to justice. These two characters are very different and represent very different eras of women, Clytemnestra a more feministic, outgoing, and care free woman; whereas Electra is quiet, dutiful, and outspoken. They have different views

    Read More

  • Defense of Socrates

    1586 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first main argument in support of the thesis is that it is society’s job to educate the youth and Socrates argues that it is impossible for just one man to corrupt the youth. This is the first mistake made by Meletus, as he makes the absurd overstatement that “every Athenian improves and elevates [the youth]; all with the exception of [Socrates],” who alone is their corrupter. Socrates goes on to defend himself by alluding to a horse analogy. Socrates argues that (P1) trainers improve horses, (P2) all others who simply ride horses, injure or corrupt horses, (P3) there are fewer trainers than riders, (P4) therefore, those who corrupt horses are in smaller number than those who ride horses and we can conclude that (C) people are corrupted by a majority rather than a minority. Socrates believes that this analogy to horses must be true of all animals and furthermore, for all people. Socrates utilizes this analogy to point out that Meletus’ overstatement is rather ironic, since according to Meletus all other beings except for the youth in the world are more likely to be corrupted by a majority rather than a minority. For this reason, it is more logical that the youth have been corrupted by a majority like the judges, senators, and the Athenians rather than one man, Socrates. Meletus’ overstatement and inability to defend himself reflects poorly on his character and further gives more authority to Socrates as it seems that Meletus is only arguing for the sake of argument and that he has no true evidence to prove that Socrates is guilty of corrupting the youth.

    Read More

  • An Apology From Socrates

    1717 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his examination of Meletus, Socrates makes three main points: 1) Meletus has accused Socrates of being the only corrupter, while everyone else improves the youth. Socrates then uses an analogy: a horse trainer is to horses as an improver is to the youth. The point is that there is only one improver, not many. 2) If Socrates corrupts the youth, either it is intentional or unintentional. No one would corrupt his neighbor intentionally, because he would harm himself in the process. If the corruption was unintentional, then the court is not the place to resolve the problem. The other possibility is that he does not corrupt them at all. 3) In frustration, Meletus accuses Socrates of being "a complete atheist," at the same time he claims Socrates teaches new gods. Thus, Meletus contradicts himself. Socrates argues that fear of death is foolish, because it is not known if death is a good or an evil, thus there is no reason to fear death.

    Read More

  • The Republic - Book 1 - Theme Of Justice

    2360 Words  | 5 Pages

    Traditionally justice was regarded as one of the cardinal virtues; to avoid injustices and to deal equitable with both equals and inferiors was seen as what was expected of the good man, but it was not clear how the benefits of justice were to be reaped. Socrates wants to persuade from his audience to adopt a way of estimating the benefits of this virtue. From his perspective, it is the quality of the mind, the psyche organization which enables a person to act virtuously. It is this opposition between the two types of assessment of virtue that is the major theme explored in Socrates’ examination of the various positions towards justice. Thus the role of Book I is to turn the minds from the customary evaluation of justice towards this new vision. Through the discourse between Cephalus, Polemarchus and Thrasymachus, Socaretes’ thoughts and actions towards justice are exemplified. Though their views are different and even opposed, the way all three discourse about justice and power reveal that they assume the relation between the two to be separate. They find it impossible to understand the idea that being just is an exercise of power and that true human power must include the ability to act justly. And that is exactly what Socrates seeks to refute.

    Read More

  • Four Charges Brought Agains Socrates in the Apology by Plato

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...one else improves the youth, therefore to me it sounds as if Meletus doesn’t even know what improves the youth himself. I believe the main thing Meletus wanted was for Socrates to be sentenced to death from the beginning.

    Read More

  • Retribution And Vengeance In Sophocles 'Herodotus'

    663 Words  | 2 Pages

    Herodotus and Sophocles both believe(conclude in their texts that) God expresses his will through divine communication and thus the inescapability of Gods will is enforced by the placement of human beings who act to fulfill divine messages.

    Read More

  • The Cycle of Vengeance in Aeschylus’s Oresteia

    2434 Words  | 5 Pages

    Aeschylus. “The Oresteia.” Aeschylus: The Oresteia. Tran. Robert Fagles. New York: Penguin Books, 1979. 99-277.

    Read More

More about Justice In Electra, Apology And The Crito By Sophocre

Open Document