Anna Karenina, by Leo Tolstoy

936 Words2 Pages

Leo Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina shows the fall of a high societal woman as she gives up everything for love. She resists society’s expectation of women to submissively dismiss their passions and live for raising a family. Anna and her lover Vronsky attempt to create their own life, separate and independent from society, believing that their love alone will sustain each other. However, they tragically discover that isolation is not a life that they can endure. Vronsky’s love does not mature; he does not know how to develop it beyond passion. He needs ambitions, accomplishments, and admiration, and Anna longs either for Vronsky entirely, or for approbation: at least enough courtesy or civility to not be openly scorned and humiliated in public. Unable to empathize and appreciate what each other need and what each other have given up for one another, hostility and resentment stockpile. Anna’s suicide is as much a punishment intended for Vronsky as it is as an escape from here own despair as it is way of securing his love for her eternally. The ultimate irony then is that Levin and Kitty achieve what Anna and Vronsky so desperately sought, a fulfilling and happy life, free from society.

Both Anna and Vronsky come from aristocracy, and both enjoy the decorum and pleasure that comes with high society. Anna effortlessly glides from social circle to social circle just as Vronsky ceaselessly and confidently advances through the ranks in the military. Both are sophisticated and worldly, and both are vain. When Vronsky followed Anna to Petersburg, “she was overcome by a feeling of joyful pride… to know that he was there in order to be where she was.” Vronsky “felt himself a king...” and was proud of attracting such a prestigious women. To Vron...

... middle of paper ...

...ty. They took a miscalculated risk in believing they could separate from an elite group that they depended on and were the product of. They acted on their passion for each other. However, passion dies. Vronsky was unable to reassure Anna that his love for her was steadfast, “Assurances of love seemed so banal to him…” , and Anna was not secure enough to trust in his love. Tolstoy’s happy family is the conventional mold. The woman is wife, mother and domesticity; the husband is worker, provider and authority. “All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” If we take this statement to be true what then is Tolstoy saying about society, feminism and relationships? What then is a life worth living?

Works Cited

Tolstoy, Lev Nikolaevitch, Richard Pevear, Larissa Volokhonsky, and John Bayley. Anna Karenina. London: Penguin, 2003. Print.

Open Document