Sixty percent said buying and wearing clothing made of animal fur was morally acceptable. A slightly lower percentage 59% of respondents rated medical testing on animals as morally acceptable. Only 31% of poll participants rated the cloning of animals as morally acceptable. This can or may show that there are inhumane people out there that do not have compassion for misery or suffering of other animals. Considering that they are animals , they are mammals.
There are significant differences between men and women on all the animal morality issues. Men were far more accepting than women of buying and wearing animal fur 73% versus 48% conducting medical testing on animals 69% versus 49%, and cloning animals 43% versus 19%. Differences based on political affiliation were far more subtle. This shows that there is a difference between what men and women and their morality issues. basically there is no right or wrong opinion, since it just is an opinion. On this study men seem to be more inhuman since they do not consider their suffrage and their lives.
Republicans were more likely to state that the buying and wearing of animal fur and conducting medical tests on animals were morally acceptable than Independents or Democrats. Republicans were ...
... middle of paper ...
...g-term or multi-phase tests can increase the costs of the practice as well. The actual price paid for the animals is also worth consideration; there are companies that breed and sell animals specifically for testing purposes. On debate.org eighty seven percent of members are pro for animal rights, and thirteen percent of members are against animal rights.
In conclusion Certain creatures ought to be ensured rights under sanctioning restricting Animal Bill of Rights. In the event that creatures don 't have a feeling of ethical quality, why would it be a good idea for them to have rights? These creatures do have a feeling of ethical quality they can recognize right from wrong and great and awful conduct. People are fit for having feeling of ethical quality that is the reason they have rights, however not all people do the right things they go and abuse laws constantly.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The purpose of this paper is to answer the question: should non-human animals have rights. I firmly believe that non-human animals should be given rights, rights such as the right to freedom, the right to be treated with respect and care, and the right to not be exploited. Non-human animals are similar to humans in many ways and they should not be subjected to the unsanitary and crowded living conditions that factory farms and other forms of non-human animal mass production factories force them into..... [tags: Freedom, Respect, Care]
996 words (2.8 pages)
- Should we stop tests on animals. There are many pros and cons to the practice of animal testing. Unfortunately, neither side pleases everyone- including the general public, government and scientists. Animal testing is a process that has been going on for centuries for many different reasons; finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medication. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer, HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. Scientists usually use animals for testing purpose because they are considering similar to humans.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
2093 words (6 pages)
- Beginning in ancient times, animals were experimented on out of pure curiosity, and people did not understand how different systems really worked. Today, we have an undeniable understanding of the body’s functions and metabolism, proving that this practice is becoming increasingly unreliable, expensive, and above all: cruel. For centuries, innocent animals such as rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, birds, cats, dogs, and primates have been used for man’s own selfish wants. In modernity, “an estimated 26 million animals are used and slaughtered every year due to animal research.” (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?”, 1).... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1563 words (4.5 pages)
- Animals Testing should Be Eliminated Why do many people not care for animals’ lives. Many people believe that animal testing is the only choice to do medical research. Even though some animals have similar characters, needs, and cognitive, intellectual thinking with a human being, so they have to be able to have their freedom to avoid suffering from slaughters, hunters, researchers, and so on. Moreover, medical, or chemical industry researchers need to come up with different methods or technologies other than using animals to test drugs, toxic chemicals, and household products.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing, Human, Rights]
1539 words (4.4 pages)
- Fight the Cruelty Animal cruelty is a very sad topic, but it needs to be addressed. Innocent animals are harmed by humans, and not for self defence or survival. People do this just to do it, and that is why it is so ridiculous. Some do it to benefit from the animal, use them for things like fashion. There are other alternatives to making a fur coat, harming an innocent animal should not be an option. The fact that humans do it and get away with it is sickening. There are laws that protect the animals, but people, especially hunters, find ways around them.... [tags: Abuse, Cruelty to animals, The Animals]
1064 words (3 pages)
- Animal Rights Non-human animals are given rights only because of their interactions with human beings. Without involvement with humans, animals do not deserve rights. It is through this interaction with humans that animals are even given moral consideration. We do not give rights to a rock simply because it is a creation of Mother Nature, similarly non-human animals do not have rights unless it is in regards to humans. As pointed out by Jan Narveson "morality is a sort of agreement among rational, independent, self-interested persons who have something to gain from entering into such an agreement" (192).... [tags: Papers]
1088 words (3.1 pages)
- “Life is as dear to a mute creature as it is to man. Just as one wants happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not die, so do other creatures.”, is a quote by His Holiness The Dalai Lama, in regards for animals. Animal testing, also known as animal research, refers to the use of nonhuman animals in scientific experimentation. Vertebrate animals, including mice, birds, fish, rabbits, guinea pigs, dogs and cats are annually used worldwide for analysis. Animal rights are an extremely delicate matter; opposing sides have valid reasons for or against animal testing.... [tags: Animal Testing, Educational Values]
1156 words (3.3 pages)
- The definition of insane in today’s world is embedded with controversy by our society. As an active member of society, Ken Kesey writes his own opinion of insanity in his successful novel, One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest by subtly incorporating his his thoughts towards the topic through dialogue between characters, the narrators comments, and much more. Kesey begins his novel by introducing an outspoken man named Randle Patrick McMurphy who enters the mental hospital where the narrator, Chief Bromden , resides and creates a lasting effect on his fellow patients by allowing them to think beyond societies’ strict ideology and how to gradually immerse themselves with their individuality.... [tags: Animal rights]
1068 words (3.1 pages)
- Should animals have rights. They can almost be compared to humans due to the fact that they have a heart, they can walk, and they can communicate with others. However, animals don’t necessarily kill humans for food like we kill them for food. So, in many minds, animals are not comparable to humans. But, should animals still have rights. Is it really morally acceptable to kill animals for food. Some people believe that killing animals is unacceptable. They believe that violates animal rights if such rights existed.... [tags: Animal Rights]
1090 words (3.1 pages)
- ... “Obvious and subtle differences between humans and animals in terms of our physiology, anatomy, and metabolism make it difficult to apply data derived from animal studies to human conditions.” (Matthews, American Anti-Vivisection Association) 92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals, fail in human clinical trials, because they are either too dangerous, or do not work. Simply because both of these hypotheses have been effectively proven true, there is no way to truly know whether or not we can trust any, much less all,of the medicines that have been tested on animals.... [tags: abuse, diseased, killed for testing]
1253 words (3.6 pages)