Each year more than 100 million animals are killed in laboratories for animal research. Whether it be to make sure a new mascara wont blind hundreds of women, or for cancer research, it is likely that animals lives will be sacrificed in order to do so. Subjected animals are forced into extreme conditions, often tortured and forced to endure treatments and tests that are unimaginable to humans, all the while deprived of everything they’ve ever known to be habitual. While many species are protected from animal research by the Animal Welfare Act, many are not. It has been widely debated as to whether animal testing is justified, or if it has been taken too far.
The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is a law that holds a certain standard of treatment that is to be provided for animals used in research. While it does protect certain species from the horrors of animal testing, 95% of all animals that are experimented on for medical and cosmetic research are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act. With out protection of the AWA, many species including fish, birds, rats and mice are succumbed to extreme mistreatment and abuse while being tested on. It is theses animals that the concern of so many millions of people feel need more protection and a greater right to life.
It is widely known that animal research has been instrumental in the development of many medical treatments and the advancement of the medical world. Its practice has led doctors to better and even save the lives of millions of people in ways that they couldn’t have otherwise. These breakthroughs include penicillin research on mice, tuberculosis bacteria findings in chicken and guinea pigs, asthma research on frogs, the Hib meningitis vaccine developed in mice against ...
... middle of paper ...
...subjected to the research of a someone who sees it as nothing more than an experiment, and not even have the capacity to understand it. Tom L. Beauchamp (2015) along with three other authors published an article on the ethics of animal experimentation where they question the morality of animal research and bring the idea of consent or objection into thought. Beauchamp (2015) refers to cases that
illustrate ethical deficiencies in the conduct of animal research, including inattention to the issue of consent or assent, incomplete surveys of the harms caused by specific protocols, inequitable burdens on research subjects in the absence of benefits to them, and insufficient efforts to provide ethical justification.
Animals have no say in their fate or their treatment, and for that reason are easily enslaved to research to further a world that they can not even live in.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- From Pavlov to Revlon When she met her rescuer for the first time, the gaunt dog crawled onto her belly, craving affection but to frightened to stand up. She was only known as the number tattooed on her ear. She was sick with tapeworms, hookworms, a vaginal infection, and her teeth were rotted. Daisy was one of 250 dogs and cats rescued in 2011 from Professional Laboratory and Research Services (PLRS), after it was shut down from PETA investigation. Many pharmaceutical companies paid PLRS to infect the dogs and cats with different types of worms, fleas, and ticks.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing, Acute toxicity]
1551 words (4.4 pages)
- Did you know, different pharmaceutical and medical companies can avoid animal rights laws if they use rats or mice in their studies and experiments. The Animal Welfare Act is an act that has been around since 1966 and has been molded and changed throughout the years as research has surfaced about different species of animals. Though, even with all these changes, it still fails to protect the rights of some types of rats, mice, and birds. One of the main things that has to be understood to fully ponder this issue of animal rights is a concept called the 3Rs.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, In vivo]
2002 words (5.7 pages)
- There are nearly 26 million animals in the United States who are tested for commercial and scientific use. The AWA- Animal Welfare Act- provides limitations on which animals institutions and scientists can use. Since 1850, the AWA protected about 1,134,693 animals, but has left about 25 million other animals to be scientifically and commercially used. The fact that there are about 25 million animal species not protected by the AWA has many people against animal testing. The AWA sets minimum housing standards and also requires regular inspections by veterinarians.... [tags: ethical issues, animal welfare]
1260 words (3.6 pages)
- Animal testing has been around a long time, as back as the seventeen century in Harvey. In an article titled “History of Animal Research” by Understanding Animal Research they talk about some events that had happen in the past in the United Kingdom with the use of animal in scientific experiments. According to Understanding Animal Research, “In 1876, parliament passed the Cruelty to Animals Act, the first legislation aimed at regulating animal experiments” (para. 1). This was when they had approved to experiment in animals in the UK; the day they had decided to take the lives of instant animals that have not done animal harm.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1095 words (3.1 pages)
- Abstract: For centuries, the use of animal experimentation in the biomedical field has been questioned ethically. Do the benefits of animals used in research outweigh the pain that the animals endure. Animal rights activist will argue that there are new alternatives that are more accurate than animal testing. Also, even though there is an Animal Welfare Act (AWA), there is still little protection for animals. Nonetheless, scientists will continue to use animals for the advancement in the medical field because there have been various cases where animals have paved the way, medically, for humans to this day.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1231 words (3.5 pages)
- ... However, animal testing is seen by many to be cruel, wasteful, and inefficient. Because of this researchers have spent their lives finding alternative methods to animal testing and have succeeded, but because so much has been so much accomplished through animal testing, researchers are hesitant to use alternatives. One reason we need to change from animal to alternative research is the cruelty factor at play when you test on live test subjects. Because of the controversy surrounding the topic, animal testing is highly regulated.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
763 words (2.2 pages)
- For centuries, the use of animal experimentation in the biomedical field has been questioned ethically. Do the benefits of animals used in research outweigh the pain that the animals endure. Animal rights activists will argue that there are new alternatives that are more accurate than animal testing. Nonetheless, scientists will continue to use animals for the advancement in the medical field because there have been various cases where animals have paved the way, medically, for humans to this day.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1000 words (2.9 pages)
- In discussions of animal rights, one controversial issue has been animal experimentation. On the one hand, advocates argue that all animals have the right to not be exploited for experimentation. On the other hand, skeptics contend that animal experimentation is necessary in order to improve human health. I strongly believe that animal experimentation is unnecessary as it can be unreliable and cruel. Animals should not be forced to suffer for research. Alternatives for animal experimentation are on the rise and eventually these experimentations will come to an end for the better.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
2243 words (6.4 pages)
- Every year, over two hundred million innocent animals are injured or killed in scientific experiments across the world. Of those animals, between seventeen and twenty million are used in the United States alone. In the United States alone an animal dies in a lab every three seconds. People in favor of animal experimentation say they’re taking animal lives in order to save humans. However is it really necessary to subject animals to painful experiments and torturous conditions in the name of science.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1680 words (4.8 pages)
- Animal Testing Animal testing is the running of tests and the research done in a laboratory on animals. Some of the tests are done to benefit human lives and other tests are done to determine side effects of a certain household or cosmetic products. It is a topic that has been up for debate for many years not only in the United States, but all around the world. While some support the advances that come from the research others oppose the cruelty that the media projects to society. No matter what one’s opinion of the subject is, it is still something that our society and culture deals with.... [tags: Animal Testing]
809 words (2.3 pages)
- European Colonization Of The Americas
- Technology Affects All Facets Of Higher Education
- Ethical Principles Of The American Nursing Association
- English Language Learners : A Difficult Time Meeting America 's Academic Achievement
- Effects Of The Drought On The Population Of California
- Never Fall Of Love With A Player