Humans violate animals’ rights when doing research by giving them no choice but to participate. Animals, like humans, feel, think, and experience pain so they should be approached with the same consideration as humans. While animals are never given the choice of not engaging in the experiments, they are exposed to painful tests that often cause permanent damage, sometimes death. To test the safety of new chemicals, products, and cosmetics, animals are poisoned and killed by being forced to intake harmful substances. Each year approximately 3 million animals are used in experiments in British laboratories (Animal Aid). This amount does not include animals that have been purposely bred to be used in experiments or the animals turned down for not being adequate. If these animals were also included in the annual statistics, the number of animals used in experiments would increase by millions. These innocent creatures have to suffer for the benefits of humans.
Animal testing has assisted in the improve...
... middle of paper ...
...is too hazardous. EpiOcular is a thin layer of skin cells used to further research on products without involving animal cruelty such as the rabbit eye test that causes discomfort. New techniques are being developed every day to avoid animal testing while furthering research of common products.
Terrifying and unthoughtful operations performed on animals should be avoided as much as possible and non-harmful procedures should be more commonly used to provide further research on human products. People should take precautions when gaining data on products by thinking about how the animal would feel. Since the animal does not have a voice of its own, their decisions are made for them. The disadvantages of animal testing tremendously outweigh the advantages. Animals are held accountable for further human product development while they suffer when their rights are ignored.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Experiments on Animals Should Not be Banned (word count includes paper outline) Technology and animal testing have provided the human population with many advancements in the past century. Every opportunity to embrace these advancements should be used for the betterment of the human population. It is often an argument based on personal opinion, but once the facts are analyzed, the affirmatives of animal testing outweigh the rationale for banning animal testing. The study of diabetes, as well as other diseases, have benefited significantly from animal testing.... [tags: Animal Testing]
2690 words (7.7 pages)
- Introduction Each year in USA laboratories more then 100 million animals are burned, poisoned and lamed (Top 5 Shocking Animal Experimentation Facts). Each year scientists use animals in order to progress, to improve life of people and animals. However, many testing animals suffer and die. But others do not agree and support the fact that we should use animals because of advance. So what are advantages and disadvantages of using animals. This problem will be researched from different areas such as medicine, ethics and economy.... [tags: Pro Con Essays]
1398 words (4 pages)
- Animals are held accountable for experiencing pain so humans can obtain data to get the best out of products. People believe in order to advance products, animals must undergo rigorous procedures. Animals endure pain, grieve from loneliness, and yearn to walk freely. The animals used in the trials can only involuntary sit in fear and wait patiently for the next terrifying, painful operation that will be performed on them. Most of the time, the results are not accurate since humans and animals differ greatly.... [tags: Animal Rights, Animal Testing]
857 words (2.4 pages)
- It's Time to Stop Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. According to data collected by F. Barbara Orlans for her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing (62). People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Topics]
1596 words (4.6 pages)
- 1) Purpose and Utility of Psychological Assessment An intellectual disability (ID) is apparent when there are limitations in important areas of intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior originating before the age of 18 years (Drew & Hardman, 2007). If Jenny has an ID, there is a good chance she will have a decreased level of intellectual capacity and possible behavioral issues including areas of personal need and social aptitude. It is important to note that there is a range of abilities among people with an ID as they are very heterogeneous, varying from mild to severe disabilities in various levels of intellectual and adaptive behavior (Drew & Hardman, 2007).... [tags: intellectual disability, social, development]
2582 words (7.4 pages)
- The Research and Development of the High Altitude Sleeping System: HASS Abstract Various negative physiological effects of sleeping at high elevations increase dramatically above 12,000 feet. These effects include dehydration, hypothermia, susceptibility to respiratory tract infection, high altitude sleep apnea, severe fatigue, and other ailments of varying severity. Until now, technology has done very little to address these problems. Working in the University of Colorado at Boulder’s Biological Altitude Testing Laboratory, undergraduate David de la Garza and I developed a High Altitude Sleeping System called HASS.... [tags: Essays Papers]
1735 words (5 pages)
- Animal testing : Why are animals being tortured. An English philosopher Jeremy Bentham once stated his question about animals “Can they reason?Can they talk. most importantly, Can they suffer?”(Peter Singer) Are animals born to be experimented . In fact,95% of animals are not protected by Federal Animal Welfare act[AWA] in experiments(The Hastings Center). Some people think animal testing is unjust because of how they treat animals and use animals. which is just cruel and inhumane. I mean why are scientists using animals when we can use humans for more reliable information.... [tags: Animal Testing Essays]
884 words (2.5 pages)
- Animals are used in research to develop new medicines and for scientists to test the safety of the medicines. This animal testing is called vivisection. Research is being carried out at universities, medical schools and even in primary and elementary schools as well as in commercial facilities which provide animal experiments to industry. (UK Parliament) In addition, animals are also used in cosmetic testing, toxicology tests, “defense research” and “xenotransplantation”. All around the world, a huge amount of animals are sentenced to life in a laboratory cage and they are obliged to feel loneliness and pain.... [tags: Against Animal Testing]
1000 words (2.9 pages)
- Physicians are known to have performed vivisection on animals for hundreds of years, and nowadays animal testing remains an essential element of research in medicine and pharmacology. Animal experimentation has generated heated discussions among scientists, philosophers, and politicians. This issue is very controversial, since it involves ethical questions. While it is generally accepted that testing cosmetics on animals is unnecessary and immoral, there is a debate concerning the use of animals for medical purposes.... [tags: Should animal testing be allowed?]
1935 words (5.5 pages)
- Animal testing for human safety is inhumane and must be banned. Beloved house pets such as rodents, rabbits and even dogs are being tested on all over the world. These powerless and voiceless animals are intentionally given dreadful diseases to find cures while scientists could be finding alternative ways of testing instead of using our furry friends. Furthermore, the tests are not precise because there have been products found to cause cancer in animals but also cures human ailments. Why are humans authorised to conduct such inhumane things, who gave humans the power of heartlessly torturing feeble animals.... [tags: Negative Effects of Animal Testing]
663 words (1.9 pages)