Some people may think that testing on animals is inhumane, however if we didn 't test on animals the only other option would be on humans. Although testing on animals may have limitations, they are also the closest living thing to humans. Animal testing is a much safer alternative to human testing. Humans have a higher moral status and animals lack human rights. Could you imagine humans being science experiments and not knowing what the outcome might be? Characteristics such as maximum dose tolerance, safety, and time span of effect all play a role, if this is done tested on humans directly many problems may arise. when testing the lives of human volunteers should not be put into danger. It would be wrong to perform such invasive experiments on humans before methods have been tested on animals.
“In one scientific trail eight healthy men volunteered to take part in this drug trial. Two of them were given a placebo while the other six were given the experimental drug. All six men who were given the drug TGN 1412 are now ill, two of whom are in a critical condition. The other four became seriously ill” (Nordqvist 1). “There was another medical trial reported where Two men who took part in a clinical trial for an experimental drug to treat chronic inflammatory
conditions and leukaemia are currently critically ill in Northwick Park hospital, UK. The neck of one of the men has swollen to three times its normal size” (Nordqvist 2). “In a separate incident in 1999, an 18-year-old boy died in a clinical trial. The teen suffered from a liver disorder, he decided to participate in ...
... middle of paper ...
...ause stressed or crowded animals will produce
unreliable research and results, and many phenotypes are only accessible in contented animals in enriched environments it is best for the researches not to cut corners to to neglect the animals wants or needs “(Nature genetics 4). If all of these procedures are not followed test could come up incorrect therefore scientist would be be able to further the tests on humans.
Given all the circumstances, animals used in experimentation do serve as appropriate research subjects. There is are many benefits to animal testing. There are so many things that have come out of animal testing, that we wouldn 't have if scientist would have other wise. Those who are opposed to animal research of any kind are not only hurting future care, health, and treatment of themselves but also the very animals they proclaim to protect.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Should animal testing be banned. Now，animal testing is still a controversial subject, and the scientists are facing an increasing problem, which more and more people appeal to stop animal testing. The original purpose of animal testing was inventing drugs for human diseases. For example, Scutti (2013) states that 98 of Nobel Prizes awarded for Physiology or Medicine, 75 were directly dependent on research from animals. The four non-animal experiment prize winners were also relied on the data, which obtained from other animal research groups.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Medicine]
1269 words (3.6 pages)
- Animals are used in research to develop new medicines and for scientists to test the safety of the medicines. This animal testing is called vivisection. Research is being carried out at universities, medical schools and even in primary and elementary schools as well as in commercial facilities which provide animal experiments to industry. (UK Parliament) In addition, animals are also used in cosmetic testing, toxicology tests, “defense research” and “xenotransplantation”. All around the world, a huge amount of animals are sentenced to life in a laboratory cage and they are obliged to feel loneliness and pain.... [tags: Against Animal Testing]
1000 words (2.9 pages)
- I. Introduction to controversy and arguments from both sides One major topic that has been in question and is now currently being debated is the question whether or not animal testing should be banned. From source #2 “An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing.  Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses.... [tags: Animal testing, Human, Animal rights, Mammal]
1178 words (3.4 pages)
- Animals are used as a part of experimentations in order to accomplish new openings. A few individuals think that it is satisfactory, while others contend that it is not moral to sacrifice animals for science. Estimated, that fifty to one hundred million of animals are used for tests in the world. Despite the significance of experiments, the quantity of animals and purpose of research are not under any control. Animals testing should be banned under a few circumstances; we can enhance the situation by using alternative ways such as replacement, reduction, and refinement according to International Society for Applied Ethology.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1116 words (3.2 pages)
- The Humane Society has stated that many animals undergo immensely painful tests, such as: the deprivation of necessities, forced feeding, the infliction of burns and chemicals, physical restraint, neck breaking, and decapitation (Animal Testing). Animal experiments have been used for centuries to test personal products, cleaning tools, food, chemicals, and drugs (Animal Experimentation Driscoll and Finley). Contrary to popular belief, many of today’s experiments are unsupervised, leaving the animals subjected to torturous, cruel, and useless studies (Animal Testing).... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1741 words (5 pages)
- Furthermore, most companies test cosmetic products on animals before they are sold to the public to ensure the safety of the consumers. “Tests that use animals to assess the safety of cosmetic and personal care products- such as lipstick, mascara, and cologne- are still extremely common in the United States.” (humanesociety.org, p.1) Although the testing of new ingredients before being sold to the public is mandatory, it is not required to be done on animals. Companies test their products on animals to see if they are safe for human use.... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
1087 words (3.1 pages)
- Its’ another morning and the room is white. There are bars all around and the smell of cleaner is everywhere. Soon I see a person holding a tube of something. The person is coming towards me. Suddenly I’m out of the bars and sitting on a table. The person held me down and put the tube against me. It burns. I want to run but cant. My heart rate goes up and I start to tremble. This will be done several times a day with several different tubes. Law requires I get pain medication but it is minimal and wears off quickly.... [tags: Animal Rights ]
852 words (2.4 pages)
- Animal testing for human safety is inhumane and must be banned. Beloved house pets such as rodents, rabbits and even dogs are being tested on all over the world. These powerless and voiceless animals are intentionally given dreadful diseases to find cures while scientists could be finding alternative ways of testing instead of using our furry friends. Furthermore, the tests are not precise because there have been products found to cause cancer in animals but also cures human ailments. Why are humans authorised to conduct such inhumane things, who gave humans the power of heartlessly torturing feeble animals.... [tags: Negative Effects of Animal Testing]
663 words (1.9 pages)
- Did you know that the shampoo you use was probably forced down the throat of a rabbit, cat, or maybe even a dog. Each year, millions of animals are used to test how safe and effective products, such as cosmetics, are. They are genetically modified, force-fed harmful chemicals, blinded, scalded, and maimed. How could one not object to this awful cruelty. Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, unnecessary, inaccurate, and expensive. The very first reason why animal testing should be banned is elementary: it is cruel and unnecessary.... [tags: Animal Rights]
538 words (1.5 pages)
- Ricky Gervais, an English comedian and actor, once said, "Dear intelligent people of the world, don't get shampoo in your eyes. It really stings. There. Done. Now f***ing stop torturing animals." (Gervais). Although people may receive Mr. Gervais’ words as harsh, his message contains truth, that people need to stop testing on animals. Animals need to stop being the center of laboratory and farm experiments, or at least given more rights to protect their general welfare and life. Scientists started using animals in testing in 1851 as a part of learning in the classroom at universities (ProQuest).... [tags: Animal Testing Essays]
3099 words (8.9 pages)