Is testing drugs, cosmetics, and other products on animals morally wrong? Animal testing has been an ongoing argument for quite some time. An estimated 26 million animals are used for testing and research each year. Many think it is inhumane and vile. While others consider it a part of natural biology. Animal testing is wasting precious life; it is inhumane and should be stopped. In some cases, the animal tests don’t comply with what will work for a human being, and there are other ways to test products in ways that do not hurt an animal and are also much cheaper. Furthermore, animals have a right to experience life just as any other living creature, and it is morally wrong to use them for cruel experiments. Animals and humans clearly …show more content…
This argument is true in some ways. In 1966 the treatment of animals in exhibition, transport, and research began to be regulated by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). This provided new rules and regulations. For example, animals had to have access to clean water and food, have a minimum enclosure size, and the facilities had to be at a proper temperature. The AWA also required visits from veterinarians to check on the animals. A main part of the AWA is where the animals come from. After the act was passed animals that were used in research had to be purchased by a licensed dealer, rather than having “domesticated” animals being tested on. This act set standards for how animals are obtained and how they are maintained at the facility, but not how the animals are used for research. There are many loopholes in the Animal Welfare Act. The AWA grants minimal protection to only certain types of animals. It does not cover fish, rats, mice, birds, and reptiles; it also does not cover any animals used in agricultural research such as pigs or cows. These animals together account for about 90-95% of the animals used in laboratories, “The AWA covered 1,134,693 animals used for testing in fiscal year 2010, which leaves around 25 million other animals that are not covered.” (animal-testing.procon.org) The animals that are not covered by the AWA are extremely susceptible to mistreatment. Furthermore, the Animal Welfare Act has not been completely successful with keeping the animals that are covered safe. There have been horrific cases of animal abuse happening behind the scenes. For example in March of 2009, the Human Society of the United States conducted a nine month undercover investigation at the federally-funded New Iberia Research Center (NIRC) in Louisiana, which mainly deals with chimpanzees and primates (who are “covered” by the
Have you ever asked yourself what kind of makeup, hand soap or detergent you are using? Have you ever been worried that you could probably be supporting animal testing without even knowing it? This is one of the most horrible procedures of modern time. Animal testing cause pain and even death to the animals involved only to determine whether a certain product is safe for human use. These living beings are kept in cages for all their lives, they are traumatized by the daily torture and by the different kinds of drugs given; they are left with open wounds, blinded eyes, etc. But, is this really necessary? Is it morally and ethically justified? Every living being, not just people, owns the ability to think, to feel pain, to show affection and
Every year about 100 million animals suffer through being poisoned, shocked, and burned for unsuccessful medical research. Some may believe that animal testing is a crucial part to medical research and should be used more frequently. Others believe the pain and suffering inflicted upon the animals is morally wrong and should not be done, no matter what benefits come from it.
Animals are used as a part of experimentations in order to accomplish new openings. A few individuals think that it is satisfactory, while others contend that it is not moral to sacrifice animals for science. Estimated, that fifty to one hundred million of animals are used for tests in the world. Despite the significance of experiments, the quantity of animals and purpose of research are not under any control. Animals testing should be banned under a few circumstances; we can enhance the situation by using alternative ways such as replacement, reduction, and refinement according to International Society for Applied Ethology.
Throughout history, beginning as early as 500 BC, animals have been used to test products that will later be utilized by humans (“Animal Testing” 4), what isn’t publicly discussed is the way it will leave the animals after the process is done. Many innocent rabbits, monkeys, mice, and even popular pets such as dogs are harmed during the testing application of cosmetics, medicine, perfumes, and many other consumer products (Donaldson 2). Nevertheless, there are many people whom support the scandal because "it is a legal requirement to carry out animal testing to ensure they are safe and effective” for human benefit (Drayson). The overall question here is should it even be an authorized form of experimentation in the United States, or anywhere else? The fact of the matter is that there are alternatives to remove animals out of the equation for good (“Alternatives” 1). They are cheaper, and less invasive than the maltreatment of the 26 million innocent animals that are subjected to the heartlessness of testing each year (“Animal Testing” 4). All in all, due to the harsh effects of animal testing, it should be treated as animal cruelty in today’s society.
When reading about how animals are getting tested, people think it is gruesome, horrific, and inhumane. Of course it will not always end well, but the reality is, people wouldn’t have half the products as they do now. People wouldn’t have half the important cosmetics that they use daily. And they definitely wouldn’t have furthered studies on diseases and medicines if scientists didn’t have animal testing. Animal testing is very needed for the advances in cures for medicine and cosmetic products. Testing on animals is to ensure the safety of others, help people in the near future and discover new cures and chemicals to advance humans. Why wouldn’t others want to take advantage of the opportunity to help protect
For example, “Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market” (Should Animals Be). While animal testing has enabled us to create great products, it is usually ineffective on humans and leads to animals being harmed for no reason. Animal testing is wrong for so many reasons, but overall the biggest reason is that it is immoral and unethical.
Animal testing is one the most beyond cruelty against animals. It is estimated about 7 million innocent animals are electrocuted, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, killed in the name of science. By private institutions, households products, cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions and scientific centers. From the products we use every day, such as soap, make-up, furniture polish, cleaning products, and perfumes. Over 1 million dogs, cats, primates, sheep, hamsters and guinea pigs are used in labs each year. Of those, over 86,000 are dogs and cat. All companies are most likely to test on animals to make patients feel safe and are more likely to trust medicines if they know they have been tested on animals first (PETA, N.D, page 1). These tests are done only to protect companies from consumer lawsuits. Although it’s not quite true, Humans and animals don’t always react in the same way to drugs. In the UK an estimated 10,000 people are killed or severely disabled every year by unexpected reactions to drugs, all these drugs have passed animal tests. Animal testing is often unpredictable in how products will work on people. Some estimates say up to 92 percent of tests passed on animals failed when tried on humans (Procon.org, 2014, page 1). Animal testing can’t show all the potential uses for a drug. The test results are...
The fact that animals are still used when animal experimentation is avoidable and not necessary makes animal testing unethical. According to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (2013), over one hundred million animals suffer and sometimes die from experiments to test chemicals, drugs, foods, and cosmetics (para 3). Although it is good that the companies are concerned that their products do not harm consumers, the law does not require most of these tests animals endure. Furthermore, these tests do not have accurate results, so the animals may suffer, but the product is still sold to the people. While products that burn bunnies’ eyes away are being marketed to consumers, government agencies are using taxpayers’ hard-earned money to fund these horrible, pointless experiments.
An estimated 26 million animals are used every year for scientific and commercial testing in the United States of America. This type of testing has been around for at least 500 B.C.. Animal testing is used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use. The federal Animal Welfare Act should abolish animals getting used for testing. There are many views on animal testing which are animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments, animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to human beings in many ways, drugs that pass animal
Over 100 million animals are abused in labs for research and experimentation of products such as cosmetics and medicines. Animal testing is the use of live animals for experimentation of products such as cosmetics or medicine and observation of behavior. Some of what these animals have to go through is inhaling toxic fumes, being burned, being immobilized for hours. All animals used for experimentation are deprived of their natural habitat. Even though testing is necessary for the safety of consumer products, animal testing should be illegal because it is unethical to cause animals pain and suffering, there are other alternatives to test products, and most tests made on animals fail on humans.
“Over 1 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in U.S. labs” according to DoSomething.org. And although these animals may be considered protected under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) they are still able to be tortured and mistreated in labs. On top of all this, there is absolutely no guarantee that results and data collected from these procedures are accurate. Our anatomic builds are similar in ways but not at all interchangeable. Even though it has saved lives, animal experimentation should be banned because it is not a guarantee that these procedures are done pain free and humans and animals react differently to the medicines and chemicals used.
Hundreds of millions of animals die every year from animal testing in the United States. Innocent animals are used everyday in laboratories for biology advancements, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic testing. They are used to provide information to make better products that are safe for human use. Although animal experimentation has some benefits, the negatives outweigh the positives. Animal testing is killing off innocent beings for the possible human benefit, and with modern technology, there are alternative ways to test products that leave animals unharmed.
“The US Department of Agriculture reported in 2010 that 97,123 animals suffered pain during experiments while given no anesthesia for relief. ‘“1,395 primates; 5,996 rabbits; 33,652 guinea pigs; 48,015 hamsters.” (Should Animals Be used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?) These numbers are outrageous and these animals should not be treated in this manner. People who are using animals for testing and saying that they are using them for “scientific advances” are right in the fact that animal testing has helped us advance in medical science but are wrong in the treatment of animals; it’s inhumane and cruel. And although animal testing can help us advance in the medical field, it is cruel and inhumane because the animals that are being tested
Animals are living, sentient beings. They are defenseless. They are experimented on and injected with test drugs that cause them to suffer unnecessary, excruciating pain. With the rise of new alternatives, animal experimentation should come to an end, once and for all.
Should animal testing be banned? Now, animal testing is still a controversial subject, and the scientists are facing an increasing problem, with more and more people appealing to stop animal testing. The original purpose of animal testing was to invent drugs for human diseases. For example, Scutti (2013) states that 98 of Nobel Prizes awarded for Physiology or Medicine, 75 were directly dependent on research from animals. The four non-animal experiment prize winners also relied on the data, which were obtained from other animal research groups.