One of the many effects of testing on animals is the injury, diseases, and viruses contracted, and the overall number of deaths caused. The animals in these labs suffer from vomiting, diarrhea, convulsion, internal bleeding, and paralysis. “Since death is the required endpoint, dying animals are not put out of their misery by euthanasia.” (Orlans) This is one of the many examples, and observations, of what happens to these innocent animals that are harmfully tested on. Animals are dying every day, just to supposedly help the human race.If the animal...
... middle of paper ...
...angerous, they are lethal, or they simply do not work. These animals are dying, being crippled, diseased, abused and used, for practically no reason.However, we have the ability to change all of this. Things do not necessarily have to be this way any more, nor do things have to be this way, ever again. With loads of dedication, we can stop this cruel hearted process. With lots of hard work, dedication, and a little love and care for these poor, innocent
animals, we can completely obliterate testing on animals. We can stop the merciless abuse these animals receive, and give them back their natural born rights. We can all work together, and rid the world of the repulsively cruel laboratories, so what reasons do we have not to do so? We can replace, and abolish, medical, chemical, cosmetic, and warfare testing on innocent animals, in many ways, so why shouldn’t we?
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... Many doctors and scientists are awarded for their findings, even if it was through animal cruelty. Dr. Levi-Montalcini won a Nobel Prize for the discovery of NGF (Nerve Growth Factor). She discovered this by attaching tumors to the bodies of unborn chickens and studying tumors on mice. Her discovery cost the life of many mice (18). One of the most controversial tests is the “LD50” test, where animals are used to test toxicity. The animals are given chemicals in several doses, the toxicity level increasing every time.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1741 words (5 pages)
- ... Many researchers deduce results just to show that these animals have some relation to humans. Also, animals can have different reactions to different things just like humans can. It does not make sense to put innocent creatures lives in danger for inadequate data. A major role in the decrease of animal testing is the three R’s. They were created by Russel and Burch in 1959. The three R’s are reduction, refinement, and replacement. In her essay “Testing Chemical Safety: What Is Needed to Ensure the Widespread Application of Non- animal Approaches?” Natalie Burden describes the effects of the three R’s principles when explained “Since then, there have been increasing requirements for scie... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1934 words (5.5 pages)
- Its’ another morning and the room is white. There are bars all around and the smell of cleaner is everywhere. Soon I see a person holding a tube of something. The person is coming towards me. Suddenly I’m out of the bars and sitting on a table. The person held me down and put the tube against me. It burns. I want to run but cant. My heart rate goes up and I start to tremble. This will be done several times a day with several different tubes. Law requires I get pain medication but it is minimal and wears off quickly.... [tags: Animal Rights ]
852 words (2.4 pages)
- Did you know that the shampoo you use was probably forced down the throat of a rabbit, cat, or maybe even a dog. Each year, millions of animals are used to test how safe and effective products, such as cosmetics, are. They are genetically modified, force-fed harmful chemicals, blinded, scalded, and maimed. How could one not object to this awful cruelty. Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, unnecessary, inaccurate, and expensive. The very first reason why animal testing should be banned is elementary: it is cruel and unnecessary.... [tags: Animal Rights]
538 words (1.5 pages)
- Animal testing for human safety is inhumane and must be banned. Beloved house pets such as rodents, rabbits and even dogs are being tested on all over the world. These powerless and voiceless animals are intentionally given dreadful diseases to find cures while scientists could be finding alternative ways of testing instead of using our furry friends. Furthermore, the tests are not precise because there have been products found to cause cancer in animals but also cures human ailments. Why are humans authorised to conduct such inhumane things, who gave humans the power of heartlessly torturing feeble animals.... [tags: Negative Effects of Animal Testing]
663 words (1.9 pages)
- Ricky Gervais, an English comedian and actor, once said, "Dear intelligent people of the world, don't get shampoo in your eyes. It really stings. There. Done. Now f***ing stop torturing animals." (Gervais). Although people may receive Mr. Gervais’ words as harsh, his message contains truth, that people need to stop testing on animals. Animals need to stop being the center of laboratory and farm experiments, or at least given more rights to protect their general welfare and life. Scientists started using animals in testing in 1851 as a part of learning in the classroom at universities (ProQuest).... [tags: Animal Testing Essays]
3099 words (8.9 pages)
- ... The purpose of this test is to see how much of that substance will cause half of the exposed animals to die within fourteen days of the ingestion of the product. There are at least one hundred and fifteen million animals that are being used in many different experiment worldwide each year. The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is the only federal law that covers animals in research. “The AWA provides only minimal protection for certain species while excluding others such as rats, mice, and birds bred for research—who together constitute an estimated 90-95% of animals in laboratories”(Animals).... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1066 words (3 pages)
- Has it ever crossed a human’s mind that hurting an animal for research is wrong. Lets help our government prevent animal testing for all creatures, especially for mice and rabbits. Many people are using animal testing as an excuse for their own pleasures, such as, hunting, cleaning supplies, medical and cosmetic purposes. Many companies are not required to put labels on their merchandises, which means people are clueless to whether products are being tested on animals. Researchers should consider the use of the chemosynthetic liver.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
2941 words (8.4 pages)
- ... Those drugs have been proved to be extremely helpful and life changing for a lot of people. Most people would never compare themselves genetically or biologically to any animal, so human drugs and cosmetics should not be tested on a species so different from our own. There are more than 450 different alternatives to animal testing that many seem to overlook. Modern day scientists have been working on a method that involves actual human cells and tissues known as in vitro testing. Cellular tests are done in a test tube, this method is cruelty-free and is shown to replicate human composition and drug responses better than crude animal experiments.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Human]
1416 words (4 pages)
- ... At the same time, companies continue inventing newer and better products that require a new set of chemicals to be tested. However, animal testing may not seem as beneficial as one would think. According to Henry Mone, “Reliance on animal testing… has actually hindered the evaluation of many chemicals and ingredients inside and outside the cosmetics industry.” Due to the amount of time and money animal testing takes, it is almost not worth it (20). It is not the time and money that have people concerned, but the way they test the animals.... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
1328 words (3.8 pages)