Is it right for us to test on innocent animals just for our human gain? The ethical issues of testing products and other needs on animals are many but when it comes down to if it is ethical, testing on animals is not ethical by any means. Animal testing is a wrongful act that causes pain on innocent animals that have no say or rights in order to stop this.
Animal testing is a growing concern because who is to say that these companies and corporations get tired or see new opportunities on testing their products in humans. What if testing humans was more beneficial than testing animals? Throughout time rules and guidelines might change for products so we should be aware of what these companies are doing to animals. Another reason why it is import to discuss animal testing is because it is wasteful in resources and time for actual humans to find a cure. Animal testing hurts millions of animals constantly and animals feel just as much as we humans do. How can we just stand by and let our fellow animals who have no voice to speak be mutilated and experimented on for the sake of science and new knowledge that might not apply to us humans? Animals have been used repeatedly throughout history of biomedical research and it goes back as far as Aristotle testing on living animals and Galen who wanted to study more anatomy of living creatures. In recent years animal testing has been under severe criticism by animal protection and animal rights groups and laws have been passed in several countries to make animal testing to be more “humane” for animals that are being tested upon.
There are some people that argue that animal testing is good for our human benefit and that it is needed to advance in technology and medicine. Some people think ...
... middle of paper ...
... put an end to animal testing and it would be prohibited for any reason. Animal testing would be abolished and other procedures would be performed and done to test out products so they could be sold safely. The positive to this solution would be that animals would be free of torture and cruelty, test results would improve in reliability, accuracy and time or money would not be wasted. The negative would be to find volunteers who are willing to be tested on. Corporations and companies could get volunteers to sign legal official documents on testing products for them in safe controlled manner. Companies could also get donated corpses, human tissue, cells and other human based things to test on. Biological based testing would greatly benefit on testing in humans because they would get accurate and reliable results. This solution would greatl benefit animals and humans.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Imagine a life locked away in a cage with no form of control on your existence. It’s cold, dark, and you are scared. You don’t have a choice of what you eat, where you live, or how you are treated. You are unsure if it is day or night or what will happen to you next. You are locked away in a prison cell and you committed no crime. This is the life of a laboratory animal. Animal testing is the use of animals for scientific research purposes and experiments. It can be used for the findings of cures and medicines to testing new drugs, to understanding the behavioral psychology of the animals themselves.... [tags: Animal Rights]
1612 words (4.6 pages)
- Imagine, spending your entire life as a hospital patient. Instead of being treated and taken care of you are being deliberately harmed. You are completely defenseless. Every day you experience discomfort, pain, and stress. Never to see sunlight, and you are completely deprived of the world. Spending your days locked inside of gray, dingy walls with absolutely nothing to do. This describes the life of an animal in a testing laboratory. It is a horrid life to live. Twenty-five million animals endure this testing each year, and 90% of them are rats, mice, and birds.... [tags: thalidomide, animals, stress experiments]
860 words (2.5 pages)
- Everyday people are using products not knowing who, what, where, why or how these products are being made from. Many companies are neglecting the use of animal experimentation by the fact that there are alternative ways to test their products without testing them on animals. If alternative methods have been discovered that are more humane and effective, why aren’t companies using them. By using alternative methods to animal testing, products and some medicines would be cheaper and more reliable to humans.... [tags: clinical trails, cell culture, guinea pigs]
1061 words (3 pages)
- vivisection Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical. “It is a simple fact that many, if not most, of today’s modern medical miracles would not exist if experimental animals had not been available to medical scientists. It is equally a fact that, should we as a society decide the use of animal subjects is ethically unacceptable and therefore must be stopped, medical progress will slow to a snail’s pace. Such retardation will in itself have a huge ethical ‘price tag’ in terms of continued human and animal suffering from problems such as diabetes, cancer, degenerative cardiovascular diseases, and so forth.” Dr.... [tags: essays papers]
2169 words (6.2 pages)
Methods of Experimentation and Research in the Natural Sciences that are Limited due to Ethical Considerations
- The production of knowledge, the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject (New Oxford), has constantly been accomplished throughout the history of man as a result of the characteristics of creativity and curiosity. These attributes, besides ethics, have set humans apart from the other species allowing for constant and rapid development. According to (Rest), an ethical judgment is the process by which an individual determines that one alternative is morally right and another alternative is morally wrong.... [tags: eugenics, animal testing, ethical judgement]
1459 words (4.2 pages)
- Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures.... [tags: ethical issues, animal testing]
921 words (2.6 pages)
- Animal experimentation, also known as animal research and animal testing, is an experimental procedure in which animals are used within academic, scientific, research, biological and commercial establishments. It is when using live animals is considered legal, protected and regulated by law, because their ability to benefit humans is very important. Moreover, people of the world have improved their understanding about their lives, their health, the problems related to health and how to solve them, how to prevent them in the future by carrying out such experiments on animals.... [tags: Ethical Issues, Animal Testing]
2477 words (7.1 pages)
- Each year, more than twenty five million animals are used for scientific research in the U.S. More than ninety percent of those are mice (Ericson para 1). The Institute for Laboratory Animal Research of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences argues that even sophisticated computers are unable to model interactions between molecules, cells, tissues, organs, organisms and the environment, as well as animals, making animal research necessary in many areas. Animal studies have been used in the past and shall continue to be used in the future for a number of applications in the field of orthopedics.... [tags: Animal Testing]
926 words (2.6 pages)
- In discussions of animal rights, one controversial issue has been animal experimentation. On the one hand, advocates argue that all animals have the right to not be exploited for experimentation. On the other hand, skeptics contend that animal experimentation is necessary in order to improve human health. I strongly believe that animal experimentation is unnecessary as it can be unreliable and cruel. Animals should not be forced to suffer for research. Alternatives for animal experimentation are on the rise and eventually these experimentations will come to an end for the better.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
2243 words (6.4 pages)
- There are nearly 26 million animals in the United States who are tested for commercial and scientific use. The AWA- Animal Welfare Act- provides limitations on which animals institutions and scientists can use. Since 1850, the AWA protected about 1,134,693 animals, but has left about 25 million other animals to be scientifically and commercially used. The fact that there are about 25 million animal species not protected by the AWA has many people against animal testing. The AWA sets minimum housing standards and also requires regular inspections by veterinarians.... [tags: ethical issues, animal welfare]
1260 words (3.6 pages)