What would you do if someone decided to force you to become their personal experiment? Guys, how would you feel if someone decided to put makeup all over your face? You would not like that, would you? So if you agree that you would not like being a test experiment , why agree to animals being tested? On the other hand, how would you feel if someone sold you a product that has not been tested and could possibly kill you? Is that better than mistreating animals? From doing research, I have found a few pros along with cons to testing animals.
Anyone can pretty much guess what animal testing is, but i will explain just in case. Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation or animal research, refers to experiments carried out on animals to observe the effect of the experimental product or behavior under study. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of everything from medication to cosmetics, as well as understanding how the human body works. Animal testing is used for countless products and applications. Some of the products that commonly involve animal testing are: Cosmetics, Drugs, Food additives, Supplements, Household products, and Industrial chemicals. Experimental research with animals is usually conducted in universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, defense establishments, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry.
Animal testing is a process that has been going on for centuries for numerous reasons, such as developing medical treatments, determining the toxicity of certain medications, confirming the safety of a product designed for humans, and other health care uses.The use of animals in scientific experiments in the UK can be tra...
... middle of paper ...
...n test tubes or plastic wells and can produce more useful results than testing chemicals on animal skin. Microfluidic chips ("organs on a chip"), which are lined with human cells and recreate the functions of human organs, are in advanced stages of development. Computer models, such as virtual reconstructions of human molecular structures, can predict the toxicity of substances without invasive experiments on animals.
From the research that was gathered, I have discovered many pros along with cons to conclude that animal testing can be benefial or worthless. Animal testing has been around for many years. Animal testing is pretty much conducted anywhere and is used for many different things. There have been many positive outcomes like cures or treatments for illnesses. Although there have been many benefits, the consequences of the animals still is a leading problem.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... Pain relievers are not used when they are being killed which means they feel all of the pain. No living creature deserves to be treated as inhumanely as these creatures are treated. Because cosmetic testing is most commonly done on animals, people think it is the only way to have new products safely tested. There are many alternatives to testing on animals. One alternative is growing cells in a lab. “Almost every type of human and animal cell can be grown in the laboratory. Scientists have even managed to coax cells to grow into 3D structures, such as miniature human organs, which can provide a more realistic way to test new therapies.” (crueltyfreeinternational.org, p.1).... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
1087 words (3.1 pages)
- Medicine, household products, cosmetic, and food has been tested and put into shelves to sell for our own kind. Animal testing, a way to enable lifesaving treatments for both humans and animals. They test on animals to see if it will cause harm or not when using. Not all things are tested on animals. Fine print labels that states that they don’t test on animals and the leaping bunny are products that do not use animals for testing. “Should animal testing be stopped?” A question that is still asked today, which has separated people in to groups of what they believe and what it should be done.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Toxicology testing]
1350 words (3.9 pages)
- Animals are often described as loyal companions that provide unconditional love and that bring joy into our lives, but yet we allow them to be subjected to harm for research. I ask, how is this any different from animal cruelty. The government allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated and starved. Each year, millions of innocent animals are killed during these painful tests. For many centuries, scientists have used animals of all kinds, such as rats, rabbits, primates, cats and dogs as a way to test the safety and effectiveness of a product before human exposure.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1590 words (4.5 pages)
- ... Many researchers also use animals to study drugs for different diseases and often just the effects of different diseases. The conditions for many places that test on animals usually aren’t that pretty either. The labs where animals get tested keep them locked up at all times. They tend to be separated and lonely due to the lack of interaction with other animals or even humans. Being confined to a cage like that is not good for any animal and should not be the condition that we are keeping these poor creatures in.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
744 words (2.1 pages)
- Animal Experimentation The use of animals in laboratory experimentation is unethical and strongly against animal rights. The abuse that animals are forced through cannot be justified when an animal is unable to sign it’s life away for testing. Millions of animals are murdered or left debilitated because of something against their own will. The experiments are severely graphic and painful, even for the smallest of tests. “Huntingdon Life Sciences is one of Europe 's biggest testers of animals. They kill approximately 75,000 animals each year, with 87 percent of these animals being rodents” (Murnaghan 1).... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1468 words (4.2 pages)
- To find out how to best treat a wounded soldier, the US Department of Defense ran an experiment where hundreds of live animals were shot, stabbed, and set on fire so military medics can practice healing battle wounds. Live goats had their legs broken and cut off with shears while monkeys were forcefully fed poison. (Shocking Trauma Training on Animals Exposed) This is just one example of the horrors of the unnecessary and cruel practice of animal testing. For hundreds of years, humans have been using animals to test products and find cures for illnesses.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing, Biology]
1992 words (5.7 pages)
- As humans, we are always trying to progress, whether it is up the social ladder, developing new technological and medical advancements, or creating a new product for a brand label. In order for this idea to be released to the population it must first be determined safe for public consumption. In order to do so, labs use animal testing to further understand how it reacts biologically. By using animal testing, scientists can focus on the products chemistry, effects of people, and its toxicology. In the 1950’s Sir Peter Medawar, a British immunologist, suggested to C.W.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing]
1428 words (4.1 pages)
- ... When did animal experimentation start. “The famous Greek doctor Galen (AD129-200) studied animals. William Harvey used animals 400 years ago to discover how blood circulated in the body. The 'modern ' era of animal research started about 150 years ago with the rise of physiology as a science. But it was very different then - there were no anesthetics or effective pain killers, so the animals suffered a great deal, as did patients. “1 Animal testing was used for advancing in science as well as medical advancements.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing, Tom Regan]
1147 words (3.3 pages)
- So the next big question is, isn’t animal testing essential. Doesn’t it cure disease and save human lives. Well the answer is no. Animal testing is unreliable, expensive, time consuming, and most of all it’s not necessary. Animals are not good models for humans. They are allergic to certain basic compounds that are fine for humans, like Paracetamol (“used to treat many conditions such as headache, muscle aches, arthritis, backache, toothaches, colds, fevers, and relieves pain in mild arthritis” (Paracetamol), and vice versa.... [tags: animal rights, research, ethics]
1082 words (3.1 pages)
- Animal Testing in Scientific Research Animal testing has been going on since the late nineteenth century. Over the years, billions of animals have been killed from experiments, but the amount of animals tested on has fallen 50% since 1968 and in 1998 reached a 40 year low of only 2.66 million procedures. With that much of a decline, I can’t imagine how many animals were once used and for what purposes. Even with the 50% decline, the number of animals sacrificed for medical and biomedical ends in the United States each year is unknown, but certainly exceeds 60 million and may possibly be as high as 100 million.... [tags: Animal Testing]
823 words (2.4 pages)
- Frauds Of The Century By Bernard Madoff
- Why I Chose Vostok It 's A New Take On An Old Concept Presented With A Contemporary Language
- What Makes A Brand And Business Up Of Smaller High End Items?
- The Effects Of Child Foster Care On The Caring Of Children
- The National Education Association ( Nea )
- A Loaf Of Bread By James Alan Mcpherson