Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
animals be used for research
animals be used for research
benefits of animal testing essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: animals be used for research
Is experimenting on animals cruel and unethical, or is it a necessary evil? Those against, argue that animal research is unreliable, archaic and a waste of money. There are many activist that lobby to make animal research illegal. I disagree with making animal research illegal. I agree that we have come a long way with technology, and technology has offered many alternatives to animal research but unfortunately, there are still some circumstances where animal testing is necessary. If we stop using animals in research, we are limiting our ability to fight disease, and ultimately endangering ourselves. Animal testing is necessary for our safety. Scientist need to investigate whether a drug is safe for human ingestion and also whether the drug is effective. No animal testing was done on a drug called Elixir Sulfanilamide (Hajar). This drug was responsible for "mass poisoning causing the deaths of more than a hundred people" (Hajar). This event and other similar tragedies led to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act mandating animal testing as a requirement before human testing (Hajar). Dr. Rachel Hajar author of "Animal Testing and Medicine" stated" [t]he above-mentioned incidents and others illustrate the harm to humans from the use of substances that have not been first tested on animals and underline the importance of animal experimentation to avert or prevent human tragedy." Animals make better test subject than humans because they "have a shorter life cycle than humans", and as a result, they can be studied throughout their whole life span or across several generations" (CBRA). Another valid point to make is that with human testing it is extremely difficult for scientist to manage all of the variables that co... ... middle of paper ... ...mal Research: How It Benefits Both Humans and Animals." It's about pets. California Veterinary Medical Association, 2005. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. CBRA. "Why Are Animals Necessary in Biomedical Research?" Ca-biomed.org. CBRA, n.d. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. . England, Rich. "Would Drugs Be Safe For Us Without First Being Tested On Animals?" Safer Medicines. Safer Medicines, 2012. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. Hajar, Rachel. " Animal Testing and Medicine." Heart Views 12.1 (2011) : 42. NCBI. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. . Parry, Vivienne. "What Have Guinea Pigs Ever Done For Us?" Guardian Newspaper. Guardian Newspaper, 1 Sept. 2005. Speaking Of Research. Web. 18 Mar. 2014.
Testing animals is used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medicinal drugs, check the safety of products intended for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare roles. The earliest recordings of animal studies date back to Aristotle, who discovered the anatomical differences among animals by analyzing them (Introduction). Advocates of animal testing say that it has enabled the growth of numerous medical advancements, tests to see if new products are save for mankind, acquisition of new scientific knowledge, and because it is accurate (B). Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to try out on animals, many animals die from the animal testing, it’s unethical, animals don’t have a say in it, the accuracy is in question because they are testing animals and not humans, and the toll of animal testing is high (B). Through the pros and cons of everything, it is bad to test animals because animals are very different from human beings and thus make poor test subjects and are unreliable, the cost and upkeep of it is expensive, and because there are alternatives to animal testi...
When you reach for a cosmetic product or even medication you do so in confidence that these products have been tested and are safe for you to use. You use these products knowing that they have been tested repeatedly, but do you know how they have been tested? It turns out that many of the products that you use every day such as cosmetics and even medication have been tested thoroughly on animals (Abbot). These test that are being ran are supposed to be for our safety but in many cases “the results of testing on animals are different from the results of testing on humans because we have different physiologies and metabolisms” (Callanan 20). These test on animals are not only unnecessary and sometimes give false results but they cause harm to
Animals are tested on for many cosmetic and medical products, but the treatment of the animals and the quality of the test results are often less satisfactory than the consumer realizes. Every person has most likely purchased either a pharmaceutical or cosmetic product in his or her lives, but the careless techniques for making these products may astound individuals that rely on drugs for everyday use. According to the Food and Drug Administration, “every year about fifteen -hundred” drugs are created, but “twelve-hundred” are deemed unusable for people. Regardless of such a high number or drug rejections, about “one-million Americans are hospitalized from flaws in drugs” (“Animal Experimentation,” 2009). Most of these drugs were tested on animals before being approved for human use, which proves that animal testing is not a successful method of experimentation. Some factors should be considered when deciding what testing method is most helpful to society; whether an animal has similar genetics to humans, if testing animals are treated humanely, and the costs of conducting the tests. Scientists and animal support groups have quarreled for centuries over the morals of using testing animals and human safety when using animals for toxic experimentations. Individuals for animal testing usually claim that there are no alternatives or it is the safest out of all the methods, but he or she may not be aware of modern technologies that are capable of making a new and improved data for certain pharmaceutical products.
The issue of animal testing has become an important topic of debate because despite the cruel and inhumane treatment of laboratory animals, people who support animal testing claim that the research benefits are phenomenal and surely outweigh the animals’ pain and suffering. I feel as though the question of whether or not animal testing is immoral is an easy answer. Animal testing on any species is unethical and should be abolished as soon as possible because it is a form of animal cruelty, provides inaccurate results, and there are better alternatives that can be pursued.
For many years, animal testing has been the main solution to test household products, food, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. The term “animal testing” refers to the procedure performed on certain animals to determine if a certain product is safe. Most of these procedures done on the animal can cause a great amount of physical pain, and distress. Most animals die shortly after the experiment because so much pain was inflicted on their body. After the testing is done, the animals are left to suffer in cages. The different types of experiments performed on the animals are outrageous. There is even an alternative to animal testing, but scientist refuse to use it, and some people wonder if animals are even needed for medical research.
To begin with, animal testing is vital to find out side effects of medicine that should be tested on animals rather than being tested on human begins. According to Archibald (2004), in 1937, in the USA, a drug was distributed in liquid to treat streptococcal infections. Unfortunately, the solvent was diethylene glycol (antifreeze), which was known to be horribly and fatally toxic but drug-safety testing was not required. 137 deaths followed. In addition, animals have saved human lives for decades. Without animal research, many of the diseases would still affect the world today and few cures would be found. According to Emory University, “major medical advances that have resulted from animal research include the treatment of rabies, smallpox, pellagra, and rickets and the discovery of sulfa drugs, penicillin, and other modern antibiotics.” Finally, animal research is continuing to enhance and improve the medical field overall. For example, a new neuroimplant system, the Tulggar, developed to solve the problems with present implants was tested on sheep to ensure the use on living tissue. Without the use of sheep to test this new implant system, the Tulgar would not have been developed and be established as a clinical tool in modern medicine (Kalkan et. Al, 2015). However, even though animal research has been the foundation for medicinal uses, animal rights activists will
Current animal testing has been a contentious subject ever since it started off 150 years back. Although a lot of people discover animal testing inhumane and egoistic, it is a important factor to boost our understanding of medication and to improve our understanding of science. Animal testing, to some, is the way to ameliorating our level of living and preserving many lives, and therefore has many benefits. On the other hand, the negatives may not be passed, and scientists are constantly trying to decrease the damages with some methods they create in the process. Even so, to the dismay of numerous animal lovers in addition to those who are endeavoring for animal rights, animal testing will not be stopped every time soon because, for now, it is the most trustworthy form of testing that includes the safety of daily products we use more carefully than any other procedure.
Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. However, what many people forget are the great numbers of animals that have suffered serious harm during the process of animal testing. Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. The development and enhancement of medical research has been based on the testing of animals. There are many questions being asked if animal research is good or not or if the benefit for us is way greater the abuse of animals. Doing tests on animals can help find ways to cure diseases, but testing on them is wrong. Although we want to find cures for diseases to help many people, testing on animals not only brutally hurts them but it also denies the animals the rights they have.
Without fully knowing how something could affect the body and just throwing it on the market, leaves a lot of room for mistake and little explanation on how those complications could have been avoided. There have been countless drugs causing the death of many 10,000 children and adults that could have been saved if the lives of a few animals been spared in the search for the answers, as presented in Hajar’s work. Scientist do not set out to harm animals and treat them in the worse ways imaginable, but that’s what organizations like Peta, would like for people who ultimately decide on laws and procedures like to believe. It is unrealistic to think that all medical advancements can be found and done in a test tube and have the same hopeful outcome as if it was done on a live specimen. Therefore, in advocacy for animal testing in the use of medical advancements and developments. This article with be the main source of my argument due to it’s compact usefulness and other links present within the article. It clearly outlines everything presented above that allows me to understand both sides of the argument and present it in a way that supports my claim for the continued use of animal
Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. As a matter of fact, the California Biomedical Research Associations states that all of the medical breakthroughs in the past 100 years came from animal research. Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for medical purposes. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, check the safety of products meant for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Without animal testing, scientists wouldn’t be as far as they are in medicine today.
Dr. Rachel Hajar M.D., in her article “Animal Testing and Medicine” published in Heart Views, which is a journal of the Gulf Heart Association, in 2011, discusses some of the tragedies that have occurred without animal testing. Dr. Hajar talks about events that have occurred in the U.S. that killed many people, such as when the product diethylene glycol was released into the public and it killed hundreds of people, due to the fact that the chemist did not know the product was poisonous (para 4). This shows how the animal testing could prevent tragedies that happened in the past to happen again in the
Animal testing is one the most beyond cruelty against animals. It is estimated about 7 million innocent animals are electrocuted, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, killed in the name of science. By private institutions, households products, cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions and scientific centers. From the products we use every day, such as soap, make-up, furniture polish, cleaning products, and perfumes. Over 1 million dogs, cats, primates, sheep, hamsters and guinea pigs are used in labs each year. Of those, over 86,000 are dogs and cat. All companies are most likely to test on animals to make patients feel safe and are more likely to trust medicines if they know they have been tested on animals first (PETA, N.D, page 1). These tests are done only to protect companies from consumer lawsuits. Although it’s not quite true, Humans and animals don’t always react in the same way to drugs. In the UK an estimated 10,000 people are killed or severely disabled every year by unexpected reactions to drugs, all these drugs have passed animal tests. Animal testing is often unpredictable in how products will work on people. Some estimates say up to 92 percent of tests passed on animals failed when tried on humans (Procon.org, 2014, page 1). Animal testing can’t show all the potential uses for a drug. The test results are...
Animal research has been around for several years. It is what helped discover so many cures for illnesses and saved over thousands of human lives. But is animal research ever justifiable? Several people believe that animal testing is cruel and shameful, but then there are those who believe it is necessary to humans well being. Animal testing is when procedures are performed on living animals for research purposes on biology and diseases that affect human beings. The point of animal testing is to see how the animals react to the procedure or medicine and if it is safe for human beings to have access to. Animals are tested with cosmetic products, household cleaning products, food chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. Should animal testing be stopped or is it justified? There are different views on this topic and each group believes strongly in their opinion.
In conclusion, there are many reasons to stop experimenting on animals. As mentioned above If the animals are tested out of the laboratories it is considered as crime. Moreover it is very expensive to test on animals. It clearly exhibits that negative effects are more domination than positive effects. In my opinion scientists must be banned to test on animals.
...between animal research and medical benefit. Animal research is an important tool to develop new drugs or treatments and ensure the safety of the drugs. As a result, animal research is hard to be replacing by other research method. If animal research is banned, it will be a disaster for the biomedical research because most of the new medications cannot be test appropriately before releasing to the public. It may also increase the danger of the drugs. In fact, the government can make law and regulation to become more strictly on animal research. It is ironic that people who are against animal research, but at the same time they are enjoying the benefit of animal research, such as taking any drug which is tested on animals. Animal research is tricky ethical decision to make, but the benefit for human is so huge therefore animals should be allow to use for research