Animal Experimentation and Testing

1020 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: disadvantages to animal testing

Every year, a number of animals are locked up and subjected to tests that cause them pain and even death. Animal experimentation is a procedure whereby non-animals are tested and used to develop treatments, check the safety of products for human use, and other commercial and biomedical uses (Woods 24). It is estimated that, over 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for animal experiments. Animal testing is a controversial topic and like any other contentious subject, it faces a great number of support and opposition depending on human perception. It has various advantages and disadvantages and they are mainly based on one deciding whether to criticize it as ethically and morally wrong or right. Animal experimentation is an unacceptable, cruel, and an inhumane procedure on animals.
Animal experimentation is unacceptable and cruel procedure that should not be supported. Animal experiments violate the animal’s rights by denying them the right to live and die a natural death (Watson 92). This is because; the animals used for testing are killed after their use. Moreover, others are injured and left to die on their own, which is very wrong. In addition, this procedure makes the animals go through a painful period while it is being administered. Animal experimentation is a cruel procedure that makes the animals suffers physically and emotionally during the process. Moreover, the before the experiment, animals are subjected to forced inhalation, they are deprived of food and water in addition to prolonged periods of physical restraints. Also, the animals are wounded physically by being inflicted with burns and wounds in order to determine the healing process. This is inhumane because these animals have emotions...

... middle of paper ...

...r against it. Regardless of the reactions from different groups, research on animal should not continue, as it is immoral and unethical. Moral and ethical issues arise about the procedure; everyone needs to take a stand as to whether it is right or wrong. Animal experimentation should be abolished, and other ways be instituted in its place. The paper concludes that animal experimentation is wrong, and so are the methods used in the procedure. Therefore, further research on these procedures should not be encouraged in order to save our animals from the pain and torture. In addition, there are alternative methods that can be used to replace animals.

Works Cited

Woods, Geraldine. Animal Experimentation and Testing. New Jersey: Enslow Publishers, 2004. Print.
Watson, Stephanie. Animal Testing: Issues and Ethics. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, 2009. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Why Animal Testing Isn't Always Representative of What Will Happen in Humans

    1334 Words  | 3 Pages

    Testing animals is used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medicinal drugs, check the safety of products intended for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare roles. The earliest recordings of animal studies date back to Aristotle, who discovered the anatomical differences among animals by analyzing them (Introduction). Advocates of animal testing say that it has enabled the growth of numerous medical advancements, tests to see if new products are save for mankind, acquisition of new scientific knowledge, and because it is accurate (B). Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to try out on animals, many animals die from the animal testing, it’s unethical, animals don’t have a say in it, the accuracy is in question because they are testing animals and not humans, and the toll of animal testing is high (B). Through the pros and cons of everything, it is bad to test animals because animals are very different from human beings and thus make poor test subjects and are unreliable, the cost and upkeep of it is expensive, and because there are alternatives to animal testi...

    Read More

  • Scrutinizing Animal Testing: Rights & Regulations

    1251 Words  | 3 Pages

    Asking just about any animal rights activists on the thoughts of animal testing, it is virtually unquestionable that the majority of them would come across the thought of some of the laws in regards to animals and how animals are “protected” by these laws. Trained scientists and researchers take on the key role of testing on animals in laboratories and facilities throughout the world. Simply in the United States alone, there are very few laws protecting animals from the unnecessary amounts of suffering the researchers force upon them with many broad exceptions. Additionally, in reference to the scientists who perform these tests, the author lists and goes into detail explaining certain associations that infrequently examine and inspect animal testing facilities to ensure that the guidelines and standards are being followed. The author then goes on to state the problems among these organizations that were originally created by the government to assess

    Read More

  • Animal Experimentation

    940 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...xploitation are acceptable in society. Furthermore, unlike other forms of exploitation which seek pleasure in killing animals such as leisure sport, scientists, most likely do not harm animals; if pain is intended on an animal it is strictly for the purpose of scientific advancement. Moreover, although, animal experimentation may cause some extinction, it is only one of many other causes of extinction, if other causes are not condemned; then neither should animal experimentation. And last but not least, those of who believe animal experimentation is wrong can chose not to purchase products that have been tested on animals.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing On Animals

    1290 Words  | 3 Pages

    Each year animals are brought to animal testing labs where scientists preform experiments on them to see if a product is safe for a human or not. These animals patiently await the next procedure to be done on them because they have no other choice. These experiments can cause multiple side effects on animals that can be both painful and agonizing. These experiments can also last days which means that the innocent animals have to live in pain up until a scientist thinks that the experiment has gone on long enough. Also, animal experiments cannot always be trusted because they have different genetics than humans so

    Read More

  • The Cruel and Yet Inaccurate Testing of Animals

    1484 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal experimentation is both unnecessarily cruel and inaccurate proving that it is neither beneficial nor ethical to perform. Animals are living creatures just like people and yet are treated as though they are nothing but tools by the self-proclaimed advanced species of the Earth. Alternatives to animal testing have been developed and presented throughout the years but scientists are stubborn and stuck in their ways so they continue to experiment on innocent creatures. Testing on animals is a barbaric practice that should have been abolished long ago yet humans have continued to perform the tests for years.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: What if You Were in Their Place?

    1622 Words  | 4 Pages

    The issue of animal testing has become an important topic of debate because despite the cruel and inhumane treatment of laboratory animals, people who support animal testing claim that the research benefits are phenomenal and surely outweigh the animals’ pain and suffering. I feel as though the question of whether or not animal testing is immoral is an easy answer. Animal testing on any species is unethical and should be abolished as soon as possible because it is a form of animal cruelty, provides inaccurate results, and there are better alternatives that can be pursued.

    Read More

  • How To Stop Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force-feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation and the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies. Additionally, in 2010 the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported that 97, 123 animals suffered pain during experiments while being refused any anesthesia for relief. (“Should Animals be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?”) No animals deserve to be treated with this kind of cruelty in a sad attempt to benefit human health. Prior to testing, it is a known fact that the animals may never survive or live past the testing. This is because the drugs they use on the animals may be very lethal, some even causing instant death upon exposure. Consequently, animal testing should not continue because the lives of many innocent animals are unnecessarily taken away due to the

    Read More

  • Animal Testing

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    McKay, Michele. "The Cruelty of Lab Animal Testing." Down to Earth. N.p., 2012. Web. 27 Nov. 2013.

    Read More

  • Ethical Dilemma: Animal Testing in Medical Research

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year about 100 million animals suffer through being poisoned, shocked, and burned for unsuccessful medical research. Some may believe that animal testing is a crucial part to medical research and should be used more frequently. Others believe the pain and suffering inflicted upon the animals is morally wrong and should not be done, no matter what benefits come from it.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    1667 Words  | 4 Pages

    For many years, animal testing has been the main solution to test household products, food, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. The term “animal testing” refers to the procedure performed on certain animals to determine if a certain product is safe. Most of these procedures done on the animal can cause a great amount of physical pain, and distress. Most animals die shortly after the experiment because so much pain was inflicted on their body. After the testing is done, the animals are left to suffer in cages. The different types of experiments performed on the animals are outrageous. There is even an alternative to animal testing, but scientist refuse to use it, and some people wonder if animals are even needed for medical research.

    Read More

  • The History of Animal Experimentation and Testing

    964 Words  | 2 Pages

    The history of animal experimentation and tests, and the argument surrounding it, has an expansive and somewhat extensive history. Some of the first medical research that was conducted on living animals was done by Aelius Galenus, better known as Galen, in the second century C.E. There have been examples of animal testing in earlier dates, but Galen devoted his life to understanding science and medicine, so he is attributed to being the father of vivisection. In the twelfth century, an Arabic physician named Avenzoar introduced animal testing dissections as a means to better understand surgery before preforming the operation on a human patient. Edmund O’Meara made one of the first opposing ar...

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    1280 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animals have held an important spot in many of our lives. Some people look at animals as companions and others see them as a means of experimental research and medical advancement. With the interest to gain knowledge, physicians have dissected animals. The ethics of animal testing have always been questioned because humans do not want to think of animals on the same level as humans. Incapable of our thinking and unable to speak, animals do not deserve to be tested on by products and be conducted in experiments for our scientific improvement. Experimentation on animals is cruel, unfair, and does not have enough beneficial results to consider it essential.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    1934 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hundreds of millions of animals die every year from animal testing in the United States. Innocent animals are used everyday in laboratories for biology advancements, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic testing. They are used to provide information to make better products that are safe for human use. Although animal experimentation has some benefits, the negatives outweigh the positives. Animal testing is killing off innocent beings for the possible human benefit, and with modern technology, there are alternative ways to test products that leave animals unharmed.

    Read More

  • The Unethical Treatment of Animals

    1775 Words  | 4 Pages

    Orlans, F Barbara. (1990). Animals, Science, and Ethics--Section V. Policy Issues in the Use of Animals in Research, Testing, and Education. The Hastings Center Report, 20(3), S25-30. Retrieved April 28, 2011, from Research Library. (Document ID: 1658998).

    Read More

  • Animal Abuse and Neglect

    1094 Words  | 3 Pages

    A large issue is animal testing. “More than 25 million vertebrate animals are used in testing in the United States each year. When invertebrate animals are thrown into the mix, the estimated number rises to as high as 100 million.”(dosomething) The laboratory testing of animals is important to biomedical research, product safety testing, and education. Biomedical researchers use animals to extend their understanding of the workings of the body and the processes of disease and health, and to develop new vaccines and treatments for various diseases for humans and other animals. However, the morality, the necessity, or the validity of the studies are questionable. Thousands of animals are helplessly killed every year that animal testing is being conducted. “Ninety-four percent of animal testing is done to determine the safety of cosmetics and household products leaving only 6% for medical research” (about my planet). This can cause harm to the animals and may in turn be fatal. It is not fair nor is it humane to conduct experiments on animals to make sure a product or procedure is safe for us. There are no reasons to regard an animal’s life as if it is insignificant in contrast to a human life. During the testing, animals may be force fed or put in restraints in order for the scientists to get the product into their systems. Ani...

    Read More

More about Animal Experimentation and Testing

Open Document