Essay PreviewMore ↓
His first rhetoric appeal used was logos. He based his guilty verdict on the logical information provided in the court room. He continued to feel this way until later in the movie when he changed his appeal to pathos. The decision to change his mind was caused by the other jurors starting to change their minds.
As the one juror that felt the boy was innocent continued to try and convince the others that there was a chance that they could all be wrong, most all of the jurors were starting to see the possibility. Every time there was a new reason why he could be innocent, each juror had more to think about. Finally, the argument about the glasses swayed everyone just enough to withdrawal the guilty verdict and set the boy free.
My next claim is in regards to the “old man” juror. If it were not for him voting not guilty the second time, the boy would have been found guilty. He said the reason he voted that way was because of that one juror standing up to the other 11 jurors. He felt that everyone needed to hear all of the arguments because they were dealing with a man’s life. Thanks to that man, the boy was saved.
His original rhetoric appeal was also logos. He was basing his verdict choice on the logical information given in the court room. He was using all of the testimony and evidence to make what he thought was a logical decision. As the evening went on, I feel that his appeal was changed to ethos because of the juror that felt that he was innocent. He was impressed by this man because he was able to stand in front of the group and stick with his guilty verdict and not be swayed at all.
The “old man” stood up for the man by telling everyone that they basically owe it to the boy to listen to all of the arguments.
How to Cite this Page
"12 Angry Men." 123HelpMe.com. 21 May 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In the film 12 Angry Men, a group of twelve jurors are deciding the fate of a young boy accused of murdering his father. Throughout the juries dilleration, one man exhibits all of the qualities of leadership. This man is juror number 8 played by Henry Fonda. Fonda not only exhibits the the 10 qualities of a leader but he uses these qualities to lead the entire jury to a vote of not guilty (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). Early on in the film Fonda shows the first quality of leadership vision. Vision can be defined as the leaders ability to know what is needed and how what is needed can be achieved (book).... [tags: 12 Angry Men Essays]
1000 words (2.9 pages)
- 12 Angry Men is about 12 men who are the jury for an 18 year old accused of murder. The judge states in the opening scene that it is a premeditated murder in the 1st degree, if found guilty will automatically receive the death penalty. The 18 year old male is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade, in their home. The prosecutors have several eye witness testimonies, and all of the evidence that they could need to convict the 18 year old male. In the movie it takes place on the hottest day of the year in New York City.... [tags: 12 Angry Men Essays]
1000 words (2.9 pages)
- The term groupthink in this report is defined as, the social psychological phenomenon that results in groups during pressure situations. This social psychology theory is broken down into eight signs. Illusion of invulnerability, Collective rationalization, Belief in inherent morality, Stereotyped views of out-groups, Direct pressure on dissenters, Self-censorship, Illusion of unanimity, Self-appointed “mindguards”. According to research conducted by Irving Janis, there are three conditions to groupthink.... [tags: 12 Angry Men Essays]
947 words (2.7 pages)
- Once planted in the minds of individuals, ideas have a remarkable ability to grow with the strength and speed of the most powerful pathogens – possessing equal communicability as they spread to proximal centers of consciousness. How can this characteristic of ideas be utilized to benefit society. In the film Twelve Angry Men, we see a situation where Juror Eight – equipped with all the autonomy and wisdom of an ideal leader – appeals to logos in an attempt to promote the consideration of an idea, which he has planted in the minds of an otherwise unanimous jury; this idea being the mere possibility of innocence in the conviction of a boy charged with patricide.... [tags: 12 Angry Men Essays]
1487 words (4.2 pages)
- Personality is essentially the culmination of the characteristics that make up an individual and that make the individual unique. Personality influences things such as a personas behavior and who that persona interacts with and how the interactions occur. After studying different personalities and reading the play 12 Angry Men I have a better understanding of myself and those around me. This brought me the realization that my close friends and I have very different personalities due to this we all have different outlooks on the world and different ways of responding to the occurrences of the outside world.... [tags: 12 Angry Men Essays]
1048 words (3 pages)
- Characterization plays a major part in most movies, this is what gives the audience insights into a characters personality. The film 12 Angry Men relies more heavily on the use of characterization than any other movie I can think of. Due to the lack of special effects and because the film takes place almost entirely in a small jury room the development of characters was key. This star studded cast of actors included such names as: Henry Fonda, Lee J. Cobb, and Ed Begley, even the guy from The Odd Couple was in the movie.... [tags: Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose]
922 words (2.6 pages)
- The play 12 Angry Men is one of the greatest plays I’ve seen. I read the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we saw as a class. The play was so alive and made me really feel like I was in the jury. The play was about a young man on trial for the murder of his father. The play showed how one man didn’t give up in what he believed to be true. The play also showed a powerful leader who fought till the end. The play was about 12 jurors coming to the same verdict. It was eleven to one in favor of guilty.... [tags: 12 Angry Men, Reginald Rose]
1056 words (3 pages)
- Twelve Angry Men, is a play written by Reginald Rose. The play is about the process of individuals and a court case, which is determining the fate of a teenager. It presents the themes of justice, independence and ignorance. Rose emphasises these three themes through the characters and the dialogue. Justice is the principle of moral rightness or equity. This is shown through juror number eight who isn’t sure whether or not the boy is actually innocent or guilty, but he persists to ask questions and convinces the other jurors to think about the facts first.... [tags: 12 Angry Men, Reginald Rose]
709 words (2 pages)
- Guilty or not guilty. This the key question during the murder trial of a young man accused of fatally stabbing his father. The play 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, introduces to the audience twelve members of a jury made up of contrasting men from various backgrounds. One of the most critical elements of the play is how the personalities and experiences of these men influence their initial majority vote of guilty. Three of the most influential members include juror #3, juror #10, and juror #11. Their past experiences and personal bias determine their thoughts and opinions on the case.... [tags: Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose]
617 words (1.8 pages)
- Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not. The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect in the White Suit. Right off from the beginning at the original vote the Architect stated clearly his position in the matter.... [tags: 12 Angry Men, movie, film]
1444 words (4.1 pages)
I feel that the boy would have been found guilty if it were not for the one juror that stood up for him. Shortly after heading to the jury room, the jurors wanted to start with a vote. They did and all but one found him guilty. There was only one juror keeping that boy alive. That is a fact. With a unanimous vote, the boy would be sent to the chair.
I can effectively argue this thesis because that is just the fact, if the decision was unanimous; he would be put to death. My thesis is also specific. The boys survival is the only thing touched on in my thesis. I feel that this thesis is also interesting because you are basically dealing with a person’s life. It is always a serious thing when you are dealing with a decision to take someone’s life. The paradox to allowing the boy to go free with a not guilty verdict is he could have actually committed the crime. The jury giving him his freedom could back fire because he could go back out and kill again.
A person’s life is always a serious thing to have in your hands and it needs to be taken seriously. In the jury room, you are sometimes given the power to send someone to death or grant freedom. There are implications to that because it is such a serious decision to be made and someone people do not know how to handle it. If you are on a jury, you owe it to the person on trial to be as sure as possible with your verdict. That could mean hours in the jury room. Something that should be considered is the future result of your decision. How is it going to effect the person on trial, their family, and the general public? Far too often, people are found guilty and put to death but to later find out that they were innocent. You would not want that on your conscience for the rest of your life.