The Frame Analysis Of Bolman And Deal's Reframing Organizations?

1587 Words4 Pages

Bolman and Deal (2013) have identified four frames, the structural, human resource, political, and symbolic in their book Reframing Organizations. Each of these frames allow problems to be analyzed from different perspectives, and they can allow leaders to see how their organizations work in a new light. In side of each of these are more specific tools that leaders can use to gain insight into organization dynamics. Frame analysis is useful for leaders because it allows for a variety of different perspectives that can be used to diagnose, and ultimately solve various problems that organizations face (Smith, 2012). Organizational structure is the linking of departments and jobs within an organization. The idea of self managing teams was a significant insight gained into organizational structure. Bolman and Deal state that self-directed teams typically produce better results and …show more content…

A significant insight gained into political frame was the idea of political mapping. An individual would probably not enter new territory without a map, yet in the workplace we regularly enter what can potentially be a political minefield. Leader needs to ask themselves; how can we map out the political landscape? Broadly, there are four main questions to ask: What are the channels of informal communication? Who are the principal agents of political influence? What are the possibilities for both internal and external ‘mobilisation’ what are the strategies likely to be employed by others? A political ‘map’ can also be created by mapping out the key stakeholders, their power and their interests. Political mapping is a critical asset for leaders to have so much so that Bolman and Deal (2013) relates leaders who not use political mapping to an individual plunging into a minefield without knowing where the mines are located (p.

Open Document