Analysis on Fredrick Engel´s Theoretical Abti- Duhring

761 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Marx and Engels’ critique of capitalist society

Frederick Engels, author of Theoretical, Anti-Duhring, approaches and analyzes how the capitalist way of producing is essentially clashing. Using Engels ’Theoretical as a source of reference, the following essay will explain Engels’ meaning behind historical materialism, the contradiction in capitalism and finally analyze the two example of contradiction provided.
The concept of historical materialism brings two words together. Materialism is defined as the belief that physical and material possessions have a higher value in survival verses the mental comfort. Historical is viewing and acknowledging past events. Engels defines and establishes the meaning of historical materialism as the progress and existence of individuals is through materials. Engels uses this term as a way of looking at times gone by and understanding the way of human survival is follow the cycle of producing and reproducing in order to continue that essential requirement in life. To understand history, one must understand the economical view first. In regards to survival through an economical approach, history is made by productions and changes. In such events in the past, how a product is produced, when it is produced and how it is distributed reflected on society in which the separation of class and estates occurred (Engels, 292). Engels reflects on the impact materialist had in the history. Production differs from now and what occurred in the past. Historically, what your produced was considered yours, however, in today’s time, what you produce is not considered yours at all. What occurred is that one’s ownership of the product was solely his, due to his own labour and raw material put in. verses now where large manufactories, and workshop created a more ...

... middle of paper ...

... the productive forces rebels against the mode of production, which they have outgrown” (Engels, 302). Engels puts the thought into mind that a problematic issue occurred in between of the mode of production, which consequently leads to a crash in the cycle. With the capitalist mode of production, with the all the productive forces involved, the pressure is unbearable hence, causes the breakdown.
In the Theoretical, Anti-Duhring, Frederick Engels envisions the ultimate outcome of the historical development of capitalism, is prejudicial. This is because labourer the production house put in more than what they receive in profit. Engels brings to light the trial and error that occurred within the historical materialism.

Works Cited

Engels, Frederick "theoretical." Anti-duhring.Herr Eugen Duhring's Revolution in science international publishers, 1939. pp.297-310

Show More
Related

  • The Marx-Engels Reader By Robert Tucker

    916 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Marx-Engels Reader by Robert C. Tucker is an anthology containing essential writings of German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Major writing selections are to understand Marx perspective about history and society, such as The German Ideology. Marx introduces his historical materialism philosophy in the German Ideology: Part 1 of this book, where he proposes communism. Although I agree with a few points Marx gives, I cannot accept his overall conclusion that communism is the only way to become truly free. Marx suggest abolishing private property ownership and remove economic power from the hands of privileged people to accomplish freedom.

    Read More

  • Jim Crow Era: A Nightmare of Racial Discrimination

    2275 Words  | 5 Pages

    Capitalism was suffering from the industrial success. Parenti uses the term “over-accumulation” do describe this issue, saying there was a “chronic excess capacity on a global scale” (32). Because of this issue, the American manufacturing and merchandising organizations found it problematic to keep up with the postwar profits. Many commodities were already around and one wanted to create a new one, the price declined. Upholding the profits that they had earned before, businesses had to switch how they ran their business. They had to expand their output which only drove down prices more than they previously were. Parenti then concludes by saying “there was too much capital looking for profitable investment outlets, and not enough profitable investment opportunities”

    Read More

  • Marx versus Reich

    1259 Words  | 3 Pages

    The rapid development of global economy with the opening of new markets worldwide gave way to the development of new means of production and also to the change of ideologies across the world. Alongside with that, the division between different groups or classes within societies became more apparent as some people got richer and other poorer. These two phenomena, the worldwide development of industries and consequent class struggles, have been analyzed by two major thinkers of their times, Karl Marx and Robert Reich. Their essays have been influential and are similar in sense that they analyze existing conditions of societies and give projections on future fates of people, or more specifically, fates of classes. In this paper, the main focus will be on the fate of the wealthiest people; these are the bourgeois for Marx and symbolic analysts for Reich. More specifically, it will be argued that the rich people will be in the worst position according to Marx and this position will cover two aspects: material aspect, which is how well the rich will eventually manage their properties, and the inherent antagonism of classes and its consequences for the wealthy.

    Read More

  • Filling the Void: Karl Marx, John Stuart Mill and Others on Identity

    1147 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, is a short publication that contains Marx’s and Engel’s theories on the nature of society and politics, as well as class struggle, problems with capitalism, and how to slowly change the government from capitalist to socialist and finally communist. The start of the first chapter in the essay, "Bourgeois and Proletarians", states ‘The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles’ (...

    Read More

  • The Communist Manifesto Essay

    1604 Words  | 4 Pages

    From the late eighteenth century and early nineteenth century major historical events such as the Industrial revolution had occurred. During this period of time Europe was switching into an economy that is focused mostly in the industrial field. From this emerged two social-economic classes, the rich bourgeoisie and the poor proletariats. Furthermore tension brewed from the two groups since the bourgeoisie source of wealth was from the exploitation of the proletariats. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’ book The Communist Manifesto responded to the situation and created a vision of an equal communist society. The Communist Manifesto was defined by the abolishment of the bourgeois sovereign rule that followed to a revolution against capitalism

    Read More

  • Capitalism In The Communist Manifesto

    1110 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Communist Manifesto was published in 1848, a period of political turmoil in Europe. Its meaning in today’s capitalistic world is a very controversial issue. Some people, such as the American government, consider socialism taboo and thus disregard the manifesto. They believe that capitalism, and the world itself, has changed greatly from the one Marx was describing in the Manifesto and, therefore, that Marx’s ideas cannot be used to comprehend today’s economy. Others find that the Manifesto highlights issues that are still problematic today. Marx’s predicative notions in the Communist Manifesto are the key to understanding modern day capitalism.

    Read More

  • Marx (The Communist Manifesto) and Rousseau

    2059 Words  | 5 Pages

    Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. The Marx-Engels reader . 2d ed. New York: Norton, 1978. Print.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx: History as Explicable Human Activity

    537 Words  | 2 Pages

    "History is nothing but the succession of separate generations, each of which exploits the materials, capital, and productive forces handed down to it by all preceding generations." Marx resists any abstraction from this idea, believing that his materialistic ideas alone stand supported by empirical evidence which seems impossible to the Hegelian. His history then begin...

    Read More

  • Marxist Theory and Oedipus the King

    1332 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. Trans. Paul M. Sweeny. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1998.

    Read More

  • Rousseau and Marx: Property and Inequality

    1831 Words  | 4 Pages

    Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Robert C. Tucker. The Marx-Engels reader. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 1978. Print.

    Read More

  • Marxism and Leninism

    1618 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Web. The Web. 15 Apr. 2014. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels.

    Read More

  • What Is The Concept Of Commodity Fetishism In 'Wings'?

    2377 Words  | 5 Pages

    In proving this old proverb, Karl Marx explained some key features of capitalism that remain relevant today. Towards the end of the first chapter of Das Kapital, after having established the validity of the labour theory of value, Marx presents a section on the Fetishism of Commodities.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx and His Radical Views

    1171 Words  | 3 Pages

    The writings of Karl Marx spell out the philosophic foundations of his radicalism. Marx’s philosophy is complicated and detailed. However, the central theme to Marx’s theories was his view that economic forces were increasingly oppressing human beings and his belief that political action and change were necessary. Marx’s thinking is a reaction to the industrial society of the mid ninete...

    Read More

  • Historical Materialism And Marxism

    1018 Words  | 3 Pages

    A: According to Marx, historical materialism has been controversial and is a part of the evil that has caused class struggle. Ruling and lower were two classes that were struggling against each other till one finally wins and becomes the new ruling power. Marx and Eagle clearly highlighted the importance of both classes in Communist Manifesto, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (pg. 344). Marx, who began his argument by stating his belief that all humans should be able to live equivalent lives under self-governing rule, and materialism, is a system that stops such equality from being achieved. A great example is that Marx connects the existence of classes through the ownership of private property and the desire to gain more property. According to Marx those who own their own property (bourgeoisie) force others who do not have their own property (Proletariat) to work for them. For Marx, materialism is the desire to accrue more possessions and belongings therefore forms an unequal society and if the society is unequal in nature some people will gain more than others and will be in position of power over others. According to Marx, materialism is a key factor of the class struggle and inequality.

    Read More

  • Analysis on Marx’s Historical Materialism

    1246 Words  | 3 Pages

    Comparing with Idealism, which stressed the human ideas’ capabilities in shaping societies, I felt historical materialism was more realistic and applicable. Despite the communism’s unclear future, the equation between mode of production and consciousness (or ideas and values) was very understandable and logical. I was convinced by the theme of historical materialism, which was “life is not determined by consciousness, but consciousness by life.” (Marx 155)

    Read More

More about Analysis on Fredrick Engel´s Theoretical Abti- Duhring

Open Document