Notable cases of checked intuitions are accredited to Juror Eight and Juror Nine because they both realized that the evidence was circumstantial independently. Although Juror Nine did not initially vote according to what he thought, I believe he only voted the way that he did because of the reinforcement from the others in the room. By the end of the movie, Juror Eight summoned the courage to oppose all the rest in the room and force all of them to check their intuitions multiple times.
Some jurors did check their intuitions, but none of them did it independently as the two aforementioned jurors did. Prominent cases of erroneous thought were all corrected, but several of the jurors stuck to their understandings firmly. Juror Four trusted his intuition until the end. He said that he felt that the evidence was irrefutable and dug up more evidence to support his instinct throughout the movie. He defended his initial position until there was so much evidence against him that he could no longer support his argument. Similarly, Juror Seven chose to vote guilty and refused...
... middle of paper ...
... from the distrust of Juror Eight’s intuition. He neither trusted, nor dismissed his initial feelings toward the witness until he found proof that the old man was not reliable. This also shows that Juror Eight is capable of dismissing and trusting his intuition in the right places. Being able to do this is the mark of an intelligent person who can think critically and make crucial decisions.
Juror Eight, being the only one to have criticized his intuition from the beginning, has shown that he is a trustworthy and unbiased juror. He did his job as a juror by not voting based on unexamined evidence or refusing to change his vote based on external factors. By keeping his intuition in check, he divulges several central points that saved the boy’s life. As a necessary part of making tough decisions, everyone should learn to be just, unbiased and use intuition moderately.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Extend Analysis 12 Angry Men Justice is a concept that is crucial for a fair and just society. For hundreds of years, countries have developed constitutions and other documents in place to form justice for those within the country. In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, the idea of justice is bounced around by twelve men on a jury. These men have the unthinkable decisions of whether a suspected murderer is given the death penalty or able to walk free. Justice is something that has been debated heavily for the entire existence of human life.... [tags: Law, Jury, Judge, Court]
2109 words (6 pages)
- Twelve Angry Men Essay The film begins as we hear the judge’s instructions and see the young man we later learn is accused of murdering his father. The judge states, if there is a reasonable doubt you must bring me a verdict of not guilty and further says that it must be unanimous and the penalty is death. Twelve jurors, men of different classes with various backgrounds, file in to the jury room given the incredible responsibility of deciding whether there is reasonable doubt whether the accused boy committed the murder.... [tags: Jury, Not proven, The Juror, Verdict]
1862 words (5.3 pages)
- Twelve Angry Men exhibits the thought processes of twelve men that rely upon their intuitions on varying levels; some of whom check their intuition, some dismiss their intuition, and some trust it blindly. Of course, absolutism in either direction is not wise, and, in almost any case, moderation will find better results, especially in a court room. Throughout the film, various characters utilize one of these false ways of thought. However, it was characters like Juror Eight, that checked his intuition that saved the accused boy from the death penalty.... [tags: Critical thinking, Law, Jury, Thought]
836 words (2.4 pages)
- Breezie Chapman Twelve Angry Men Twelve jurors deliberate on whether an eighteen year old boy is guilty, or not guilty on stabbing his father. Henry Fonda Henry Fonda or juror number eight in the film is known as one of the 50 all-time greatest movie heroes. Henry Fonda is known as a movie hero for many different reasons. One reason that he is a hero is because of how dedicated he was to the excellence in his craft or career. Henry Fonda was always dedicated to make something of himself and of the films that he starred in.... [tags: Jury, Not proven, Deliberation, Verdict]
1402 words (4 pages)
- In the play Twelve Angry men the theme of Bias is very strong. The vote is 11 to 1 in a murder trial of a 16-year-old boy charged with stabbing and killing his father. Without any discussion eleven jurors presumed the defendant is guilty. Did the defendant’s racial bias, class bias, confirmation bias, play a role in their decision. Racial Bias is a form of discrimination. Racial profiling targets certain groups based on one’s own opinion that some groups are more likely to commit certain crimes than others.... [tags: The Juror, Jury, Racism, Trial]
768 words (2.2 pages)
- As once Martin Luther King Jr. said “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Humans are imperfect and contain fatal flaws such as lacking fairness in vast situations. In today’s modern time, many obstacles lack righteousness such as the court system. In Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose conveys the theme injustice through his characterization of contrasting juror 3 and juror 8 using character foil and the extensive archetypal use of light vs darkness. Throughout the play, Rose uses the technique character foil while contrasting juror 3 and juror 8 to demonstrate the message of the play to the audience.... [tags: Jury, Court, The Juror, Evidence]
842 words (2.4 pages)
- Guilty or not guilty. This the key question during the murder trial of a young man accused of fatally stabbing his father. The play 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, introduces to the audience twelve members of a jury made up of contrasting men from various backgrounds. One of the most critical elements of the play is how the personalities and experiences of these men influence their initial majority vote of guilty. Three of the most influential members include juror #3, juror #10, and juror #11. Their past experiences and personal bias determine their thoughts and opinions on the case.... [tags: Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose]
617 words (1.8 pages)
- The story begins outside a courthouse in New York City. An 18-year-old boy is being prosecuted for allegedly stabbing his father to death. A weary judge discusses with the jury and informs that they must decide wether or not the boy is guilty of his crime, he also informs that should they find him guilty, he will be sentenced to death. In the beginning, eleven of the twelve jurors find the boy guilty, however, through intense discussion, the remaining eleven are persuaded to a not-guilty verdict.... [tags: crime, court case, analysis, movie]
1249 words (3.6 pages)
- ... He is acknowledged as an expert because although experts are not always unbiased they tend to examine cases more extensively than others. In the beginning of Act I everyone voted guilty except the eighth juror so everyone was now looking at him in curiosity as to why he voted not guilty. The eighth juror simply said in his defense, “Well I guess we talk” (Rose 11). The undistracted eighth juror does not budge and persuades other’s to look through his perspective as he points out more facts. But over time the allowance of experts on a jury has been argued as to whether or not they are truly justified or necessary.... [tags: Reginald Rose play analysis]
1433 words (4.1 pages)
- In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide the verdict of a murder trial. I’m choosing these three jurors on my legal team based on their character and contribution during the jury trial as portrayed in the movie.... [tags: play review and analysis]
709 words (2 pages)