Justice is a concept that is crucial for a fair and just society. For hundreds of years, countries have developed constitutions and other documents in place to form justice for those within the country. In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, the idea of justice is bounced around by twelve men on a jury. These men have the unthinkable decisions of whether a suspected murderer is given the death penalty or able to walk free. Justice is something that has been debated heavily for the entire existence of human life. Everyone feels it is important in some ways, however many people have different views on what is just and what is unjust. The jury in Twelve Angry Men made the most just decision they could. To understand how the decision they made was just and to explain some background I will cover a few major ideas. I will talk about: reasonable doubt, being innocent until proven guilty, the jury system, and public defenders.
One of the key principles of the American criminal justice system is the idea of the defendant being innocent until proven guilty. The idea is to give every person a fair trial. These trials follow the rules set forth in the constitution. In Twelve Angry Men, a young man is on trial for the murder of his father. Many of the jurors jump to conclusions about the defendant’s guilt because of his lack of wealth and his ethnicity. Several of jurors make comments similar to “these people” and “kids like this” are always up to no good. This here is an assumption based not on the person but on a very broad, vague, and stereotypical view. The biggest culprit is juror ten who shows his extremely bigoted views in a long rant that made other jurors change their minds. In modern society, presumed in...
... middle of paper ...
...defense by his lawyer is very clear in the story. We also see why it is very likely the lack of defense is due to lack time then the fact he is guilty. This would mean that juror eight was right in his assessment of the court case. Justice was clearly served due to the fact that the jury overcame a poor defense strategy by the defense lawyer. The jury also came to the correct decision based on evidence brought up in the case.
The court case in Twelve Angry Men had several key principles of law involved in it. It dealt heavily in the concept of reasonable doubt. It also had to overcome a biased jury, a poor defense strategy, and the loss of assumed innocence. There were several examples of past cases and studies that followed similar paths. It is clear that justice was served in Twelve Angry Men. Several tough steps had to be taken but eventually justice was served.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Extend Analysis 12 Angry Men Justice is a concept that is crucial for a fair and just society. For hundreds of years, countries have developed constitutions and other documents in place to form justice for those within the country. In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, the idea of justice is bounced around by twelve men on a jury. These men have the unthinkable decisions of whether a suspected murderer is given the death penalty or able to walk free. Justice is something that has been debated heavily for the entire existence of human life.... [tags: Law, Jury, Judge, Court]
2109 words (6 pages)
- Twelve Angry Men Essay The film begins as we hear the judge’s instructions and see the young man we later learn is accused of murdering his father. The judge states, if there is a reasonable doubt you must bring me a verdict of not guilty and further says that it must be unanimous and the penalty is death. Twelve jurors, men of different classes with various backgrounds, file in to the jury room given the incredible responsibility of deciding whether there is reasonable doubt whether the accused boy committed the murder.... [tags: Jury, Not proven, The Juror, Verdict]
1862 words (5.3 pages)
- Twelve Angry Men exhibits the thought processes of twelve men that rely upon their intuitions on varying levels; some of whom check their intuition, some dismiss their intuition, and some trust it blindly. Of course, absolutism in either direction is not wise, and, in almost any case, moderation will find better results, especially in a court room. Throughout the film, various characters utilize one of these false ways of thought. However, it was characters like Juror Eight, that checked his intuition that saved the accused boy from the death penalty.... [tags: Critical thinking, Law, Jury, Thought]
836 words (2.4 pages)
- Breezie Chapman Twelve Angry Men Twelve jurors deliberate on whether an eighteen year old boy is guilty, or not guilty on stabbing his father. Henry Fonda Henry Fonda or juror number eight in the film is known as one of the 50 all-time greatest movie heroes. Henry Fonda is known as a movie hero for many different reasons. One reason that he is a hero is because of how dedicated he was to the excellence in his craft or career. Henry Fonda was always dedicated to make something of himself and of the films that he starred in.... [tags: Jury, Not proven, Deliberation, Verdict]
1402 words (4 pages)
- In the play Twelve Angry men the theme of Bias is very strong. The vote is 11 to 1 in a murder trial of a 16-year-old boy charged with stabbing and killing his father. Without any discussion eleven jurors presumed the defendant is guilty. Did the defendant’s racial bias, class bias, confirmation bias, play a role in their decision. Racial Bias is a form of discrimination. Racial profiling targets certain groups based on one’s own opinion that some groups are more likely to commit certain crimes than others.... [tags: The Juror, Jury, Racism, Trial]
768 words (2.2 pages)
- As once Martin Luther King Jr. said “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Humans are imperfect and contain fatal flaws such as lacking fairness in vast situations. In today’s modern time, many obstacles lack righteousness such as the court system. In Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose conveys the theme injustice through his characterization of contrasting juror 3 and juror 8 using character foil and the extensive archetypal use of light vs darkness. Throughout the play, Rose uses the technique character foil while contrasting juror 3 and juror 8 to demonstrate the message of the play to the audience.... [tags: Jury, Court, The Juror, Evidence]
842 words (2.4 pages)
- Guilty or not guilty. This the key question during the murder trial of a young man accused of fatally stabbing his father. The play 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, introduces to the audience twelve members of a jury made up of contrasting men from various backgrounds. One of the most critical elements of the play is how the personalities and experiences of these men influence their initial majority vote of guilty. Three of the most influential members include juror #3, juror #10, and juror #11. Their past experiences and personal bias determine their thoughts and opinions on the case.... [tags: Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose]
617 words (1.8 pages)
- The story begins outside a courthouse in New York City. An 18-year-old boy is being prosecuted for allegedly stabbing his father to death. A weary judge discusses with the jury and informs that they must decide wether or not the boy is guilty of his crime, he also informs that should they find him guilty, he will be sentenced to death. In the beginning, eleven of the twelve jurors find the boy guilty, however, through intense discussion, the remaining eleven are persuaded to a not-guilty verdict.... [tags: crime, court case, analysis, movie]
1249 words (3.6 pages)
- ... He is acknowledged as an expert because although experts are not always unbiased they tend to examine cases more extensively than others. In the beginning of Act I everyone voted guilty except the eighth juror so everyone was now looking at him in curiosity as to why he voted not guilty. The eighth juror simply said in his defense, “Well I guess we talk” (Rose 11). The undistracted eighth juror does not budge and persuades other’s to look through his perspective as he points out more facts. But over time the allowance of experts on a jury has been argued as to whether or not they are truly justified or necessary.... [tags: Reginald Rose play analysis]
1433 words (4.1 pages)
- In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide the verdict of a murder trial. I’m choosing these three jurors on my legal team based on their character and contribution during the jury trial as portrayed in the movie.... [tags: play review and analysis]
709 words (2 pages)