Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the difference between novel and movie
the difference between novel and movie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the difference between novel and movie
The way Shawshank Redemption is portrayed with similarities and differences between the novella and the movie is that the plot and climax are completely different. The novella is written by Stephen King and is titled: "Rita Hayworth and The Shawshank Redemption." The movie is directed by Frank Darabont and is called: The Shawshank Redemption. There are many things such as the way the warden 's punishment was incorporated differently in the movie that the novella did not give insight through towards the plot and the climax. The novella and the movie have completely different plot structures in which the movie does a fantastic job at displaying a better job in comparison to the novella. The way the director, Darabont, establishes a distinction …show more content…
Just how the characters are the same, Andy 's problems are still the same. Andy still has to deal with the sisters and this goes hand in hand with the movie, but the plot and climax changes. A way that the movie 's plot is different is that Andy sets up the warden, named Norton, to be framed, unlike in the novella. In the movie, Andy has been helping the warden make fake money checks and has been keeping tracks of the checks in a book in the warden 's office in a safe. Before Andy escaped through the sewer system he had a duplicate book and switched the information and put the duplicate book, which was a bible, in the safe and escaped with the actual book thus, setting up Norton. he frames Norton in the movie, unlike in the novella, and Andy is finally free. In the movie, Norton realizes what Andy has done after he escaped. With police at the warden 's office door, Norton commits suicide with a revolver to his head. In the novella, which is different, instead of Andy framing the warden whose name is also Norton, Andy just escapes from Shawshank. After Andy escaped they searched for him for three long months. The police did not find a single trail of Andy besides his old prison clothes near the sewage dump. The warden, Norton, retired after three months of Andy 's …show more content…
In the movie, Tommy comes to Shawshank and he does not have his High School diploma. After learning that Tommy does not have his diploma, Andy helps him to take his test to graduate from High School. After months of Andy tutoring and teaching tommy, it was finally time for Tommy to take his final test. While Tommy was taking the final test, he gets angry and storms out after throwing the test away. Without Tommy knowing it, Andy still turned his test in and he passed. Tommy decides to return the favor to Andy and Tommy tells of a murderer that Tommy spent some time with in another prison that matches to the story of the way his wife and her lover were killed. Since Andy was close to the warden by helping him wrote falsified checks, Andy asks Norton to look in to this guy that 's located at a different prison. Norton agrees but talks to Tommy first about the information Tommy told Andy. Norton secretly talks to Tommy outside of the prison at night. As Tommy is convincing Norton to check in to the other prisoner at another prison, Tommy gets shot in the back by one of the prison guards. Norton set Tommy up to make it look like he escaped. The following morning the prison heard of Tommy trying to escape. Andy 's chances of getting out of Shawshank were gone. In the book, Tommy comes to Shawshank and he is later transferred out to another
Another similarity in the book and movie is that the characters have to go against their morals in order to decide what to do in certain situations. An example of this in the book is when Skip realises he would have to trespass and steal in order for him to keep himself and his friends alive. Or in...
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
First of all in the book it gives much more detail than the movie. The book written by wilson rawls is much more heartwarming than the movie that was made in 1974. The book had a lot more detail than the movie, the movie has missing events that were in the book. For example in the book Billy had three sisters in the movie
Movies and books can be very different in many ways. The Outsiders was written in 1967 by S.E. Hinton and was later made into a movie in 1983. The movie version of the book had to cut out scenes and change things that ended up creating several differences between the two. The main focus will be the plot of the Outsiders in the book versus in the movie. There are many differences between the book and the movie.
Harper Lee historically criticizes the Scottsboro trials with her book, To Kill a Mockingbird. Lee uses factual information as well as altering certain aspects of the trial in order to convey her theme, how the southern culture heavily protects its white womanhood. She accomplishes this by going into detail about how badly black men were stereotyped, about racial discrepancies, and disregarding contradictory evidence.
The differences in the movie and the book might have been intentional. If audiences were to read the book, watch the movie, and reach conclusions, I think they would have great understanding of what’s inside them both. For example, a scene in the movie in which Atticus tells his children why it is a sin to kill a mockingbird was not in the book; from that scene, I inferred on how that became the initial title of the book. By using both resources, I was able to gather information and grasp its contents tighter.
Many movies based on books, have similarities and differences between them. The same goes for To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Although the movie ran smoothly there were many elements missing from it or that differentiated from the book. Of course there were similarities and the overall theme and message of the novel was reached in the movie. Although the book was more detailed, the movie had the same plot line for the most part. There were some high points and favorite characters in both t he movie and in the book and overall both of these works of creations were very enjoyable.
At the beginning of the novel, Tom is released from jail and emerges into a changed world. In stark contrast the world he grew up in, the new world is one devastated by famine, where his people starve and die. But, in spite
Of the many changes made between the book and the movie, most were made to keep the audience interested in the story. Most people who watch TV don’t have a long attention span. Executives at NBC didn’t want to spend millions to produce a movie and then have nobody watch it. The screenwriters had to throw in some clever plot twists to keep people interested. Another reason the movie was different from the book was the material in the book was a little too racy for network TV. Take the ending, for example, nobody wants to see a grown man hang himself. This was a reason the producers had to change some material in the movie.
During the confrontation during the poker game, which immediately ends it, readers are exposed to the reality of Stella and Stanley’s
Two men with two different ways of life are connected through a time period and these two words: determination and dedication. Erik Larson does a great job developing these two characters in The Devil in the White City. On one hand, Daniel Burnham is trying to build the world’s fair in Chicago, on the other H.H. Holmes is a dedicated doctor who is determined to open a hotel for the world 's fair. Burnham is determined and works diligently to get the job done, and he won’t stop for any reason. Holmes driven dedication towards this isn’t for the common reason of making money, but instead he wants to create a safe place that he can murder people. The major difference is that Burnham choose the better path, so he was able to help others in the process. Burnham gave a blank canvas to so many inventors and creators, so that they could change the way things are viewed in the world. These two men show the opposite ends of the spectrum, which is why we have different results caused by their determination and dedication.
...s can make a person do unbelievable things. Although he was still an outlaw of society at the end of the book, his status changed immensely. Throughout the novel, he experienced reeducation and rebirth. He became a new man who fought for social amelioration and a better way of life for his people and for all struggling people. Tom learned that a man cannot just look after himself; in the spirit of compassion, he is also obligated to help others.
Are friends the best resources when in need? Yes, no? Well in these stories they are. Like in Harry Potter, he used his friends all the time like when he is wondering Voldemort is still really still alive who are the people that he comes to…his friends. Or in The Maze Runner Thomas when thomas is wondering about if he should go out in the maze and face the greevier’s. Who are the people that he goes to...his friends! In these two stories Harry Potter and The Maze Runner there are some similarities, but there are also some differences.
The similarities are quite apparent, the movie plot mainly follows the basic plot that the book took, leaving the viewer’s with a sense of accomplishment, as this is sometimes not achieved in the highest degree. Scout still has a brother, Jem. They both still meet Dill and have a few adventures with him throughout the film. Jem and Scout still have a single father, Atticus, having lost their mother many years ago. Calpunia is still their cook. And the whole story still has an overpowering sense of focusing on two main stories, Boo Radley (Arthur Radley) and Tom Robinson’s trial.
In the famous novel and movie series, Twilight by Stephenie Meyer, an average teenage girl, Bella Swan, is forced to move from Arizona (where she lived with her mother) to Washington to start an almost new life with her father. She attends a small-town high school with mostly average people, besides one family, the Cullens. As Bella and Edward Cullen get closer, she uncovers a deep secret about him and his family. Their relationship faces many hard challenges and conflicts as the story develops. Both the novel and movie share very similar storylines, however, differ in many ways. From themes to author’s craft, or to relationships, these important parts of the story highlight the significant differences and similarities of Twilight.