Argo Movie Analysis

1266 Words3 Pages

On November 4, 1979, a student protest in Tehran erupted into violence and a subsequent siege of the United States Embassy in Iran. On that day, the protesters took fifty-two American diplomats hostage. Despite this six escaped to the home of Canadian diplomat John Sheardown. The Central Intelligence Agency, in cooperation with the Canadian government, devised a plan to rescue those six men and women.
In 2012, director and actor Ben Affleck released a film entitled Argo based on the details of the rescue of the six escaped diplomats. The plot begins at the siege of the embassy, showing the six diplomats escaping. Later the CIA obtains this information and agent Tony Mendez devises a plan in which the six will pose as movie executives …show more content…

Regarding the Canadians, they were entirely not given their due credit for their aid. In the film Canadian Ambassador to Iran Ken Taylor, is given credit for his bravery and for taking the risk of housing the six hostages, but that is about it. Canadian John Sheardown who actually housed the six and set in motion the gears for their rescue is not even mentioned in the film. One of the actual hostages who were exfiltrated from Sheardown’s home said about the movie, “Argo is terrific entertainment, but it tells only a part of our story, and says nothing at all about many of the real heroes -- most Canadian -- who helped rescue us. Before Argo came along, our rescue was routinely called the "Canadian Caper." It still should be” (Lijek) in an article he wrote for Canadian magazine “McLean’s.” He goes on to detail the events leading to their evacuation stating that “The operation consisted of four distinct phases. Three were almost entirely Canadian, and only one involved significant U.S. assistance” (Lijek). This is unfortunate because it denies true heroes in the operation the recognition they deserve. However, keeping the majority of characters American makes the movie more accessible by making the story easier …show more content…

A majority of the ending of the movie is pure Hollywood drama. This is primarily because the actual exfiltration went swimmingly. Tony Mendez, one of the two CIA operatives who accompanied the six out of Tehran writes that their experience at the airport was “as smooth as silk” the only obstacle being that the “flight was delayed for departure because of mechanical problems” (Mendez). The mission being called off the night before, the lack of tickets at the airport, the realization that they were American, and the ensuing chase were all entirely fabricated. The CIA even released a series of tweets in 2014 distinguishing the “reel vs. real” versions of Argo. These tweets included specifications that Carter approved the operation before Mendez and his partner left to Tehran, there were no issues with the tickets at the counter, and they never had to scout a location at the marketplace (CIA). This dramatization, while copious, only serves to make the movie more exciting and entertaining to watch than it otherwise would have been. It may leave viewers curious about the reality of it, but it is no secret that the escape was dramatized, and a quick Google search will turn up ample results providing this

More about Argo Movie Analysis

Open Document