The flight of the earls was the departure of Hugh O’ Neill, Rory O’Donnell and Cuconnaught Maguire along with their families to continental Europe. They would never return to the lands that that they had fought so validity for in the nine years war. Their departures from Gaelic Ireland left their former dependents without a leader and thus were unprotected, as the Gaelic way of life would soon be lost. John Curry and Charles Patrick Meehan are responsible for popularising the term ‘flight of the earls’ by their extensive use of a contemporary manuscript by Tadhg Ó Cianáin, a tale by one of the participate of the ‘flight’ and his party’s later journey to Rome.
The treaty of Mellifont in 1603 had been favourable to the Earls of Tyrone and Tyrconnell, as they had retained the majority of their lands. It seems that Tyrone had lost the war but won the peace. Tyrone’s position was such that the government had to rely on his authority in the region to make any political settlement work. Tyrone now entered a bitter battle with the New English officials such as Chichester and Davis, as they resented the highly advantageous conditions of surrender granted to the Earls in the aftermath of the Nine Years War.
Sir John Davis, the Solicitor general had drafted a proclamation in March 1605, which denied any standing to Gaelic customary systems of tenure. He had obtained instructions from James I in order to minimise the danger of the earls of ulster becoming too powerful. Tyrone and O’Donnell’s lands were to be divided into freeholds held directly from the crown by their inhabitants to limit the power that they have over their followers. Tyrone anticipated this and divided his lordship into freeholds, which he allocated to close relatives ...
... middle of paper ...
...ls = Imeacht na nIarlaí (Guildhall Press 2010) p. 8
Finnegan, David. Ó Ciardha, Éamonn. Peters, Marie-Claire. The flight of the Earls = Imeacht na nIarlaí (Guildhall Press 2010)p. 8
Lenihan, Pádraig. Consolidating Conquest: Ireland 1603-1727 (Longman Pearson, 2007) p. 29
Smith, Murray ‘flights of the earls? Changing views on O’Neill’s Departure from Ireland’ History Ireland. Vol 4. No1 ( Spring 1996) pp17-20
Canny, Nicholas, XVI The fight of the Earls, 1607, Irish Historical Studies. Vol 17, No.67 (March 1971) pp380-399
Bardon, Jonathan. The Plantation of Ulster, (Dublin, 2011) p. 89
Lenihan, Pádraig. Consolidating Conquest: Ireland 1603-1727 (Longman Pearson, 2007) p. 29
Lenihan, Pádraig. Consolidating Conquest: Ireland 1603-1727 (Longman Pearson, 2007) p. 30
Lenihan, Pádraig. Consolidating Conquest: Ireland 1603-1727 (Longman Pearson, 2007) p. 30
Bush, Michael. ‘Up for the Commonwealth’: the significance of tax grievances in the English rebellions of 1536, English Historical Review 106 (1991).
Wentworth was Charles most loyal supporter, he intimidated and bullied many people to give back there land to Charles which was previously sold to them by his Dad James I. Slowly but surely Wentworth drains the money out of Ireland, imposing high tax on imports etc.. Customs duties rose from a little over £25,000 in 1633–1634 to £57,000 in 1637–1638. His ways of raising money would start to have a bad effect on his reputation. Eventually Wentworth gets permission to set up an Irish army due to violent outbreaks, using the money raised by taxes in Ireland to train up the army, so effectivly the Irish public a paying for an Irish army to control themselves, this indeed made the Irish dispise him, this new development in tern got many protestants back in England worried as Charles has now got a Catholic army but yet he’s Protestant.
There was a short time where all was calm right after the civil war. king charles the second and his father were both dead so Charles brother took over. this is king James the secondf and he was a Catholic sao he appointed many high positions in the government. Most of his sibjects were protestant and did not like the idea of Catholicism being the religion theyd have to abide by. like his father and brother king james the second ignored the peoples wishes and ruled without Parliament and relied on royal power. an English Protestant leader wanted to take the power away from james and give it to his daughter Mary and Her husband William from the Netherlands. William saled out to the south of england with his troops but sent them away soon after they landed
[1] Toibin, Colm, ed. The Penguin Book of Irish Fiction. New York: Penguin Books, 2001.
Meagher, Timothy. “The Columbia Guide to Irish American History.” Columbia University Press- New York, 2005
Malory, Thomas. King Arthur and His Knights: Selected Tales by Sir Thomas Malory, ed. Eugene Vinaver (London: Oxford UP, 1975) 124-25.
O'Connor, Thomas H. The Boston Irish: A Political History. Boston, MA. Northeastern University Press, 1995.
There is particular consideration given to the political climate in this story. It is incorporated with social and ethnic concerns that are prevalent. The story also addresses prejudice and the theme of ethnic stereotyping through his character development. O'Connor does not present a work that is riddled with Irish slurs or ethnic approximations. Instead, he attempts to provide an account that is both informative and accurate.
The ancient mythology of Ireland is one of its’ greatest assets. The glorious, poetic tales of battles, super humans, demigods and heroes ranks among the best of ancient literature. The book of the Dun Cow, (Lebor na huidre), was written around 1100 and contains stories from the eighth and ninth centuries. The Book of Invasions, (Lebor Gabala), tells how the mythical ancestors of the Irish, the God-like Tuatha Dé Danann, wrestled Ireland (or Erin) from misshapen Fir Bolg in fantastic battles. The Fir Bolg were traditionally linked to Gaul and Britain so the analogy between them and the invading English was complete.
Tithe Applotment Books for Northern Ireland, ca. 1822—1937. Ireland: Land Commission. Parish of Dromore, Tyrone. FHL microfilm 258456.
Irish American Magazine, Aug.-Sept. 2009. Web. The Web. The Web. 06 May 2014.
Macleod, Mary, and John W. Hales. The Book of King Arthur and his Noble Knights.
Ronsley, Joseph, ed., Myth and Reality in Irish Literature, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Canada, 1977
To undertake a full thematic investigation of this period would be very much beyond the scope of this paper. Thus, the essay will embark on a high level chronological interpretation of some of the defining events and protagonists, which influenced the early modernization of Ireland during the period 1534-1750. The main focus of the paper will concentrating on the impact and supervision of the Tudor dynasty. Firstly, the essay will endeavour to gain an understanding as to what contemporary historians accept as being the concept of modernization during this time period. The paper will then continue by examine the incumbent societal and political structure of Ireland prior to the Tudor conquests. This will have the impact of highlight the modernising effects produced by the subsequent attempts by the Tudors to consolidate and centralise power in the hands of the State. Once more, due to the vast nature of the time period, not every modernizing effect can be examined. Therefore, the paper will concentrate on the modernization of the political landscape, land ownership and the impact this had on the geographic construct of the island.
McCann et al. Belfast: Institute of Irish Studies, 1994, 95-109).