Akinfenwa Oluwaseun's The Role Of Religion In Society

1401 Words3 Pages

Author Akinfenwa Oluwaseun also has evidence in his article “The Role of Religion in Society…” that would effectively support claims and ideas made by Salman Rushdie in “Imagine There’s No Heaven.” In his article, Rushdie was questioning the causality of some gruesome things allowed through religious practices. He proposed, “…many unbearable things-female circumcision to name just one-can be excused on culturally specific grounds, and the universality of human rights, too, can be ignored?” (Rushdie 518). This was a very strong sentence in Rushdie’s work. He takes up a sarcastic tone in this sentence, by asking if human rights can also be ignored, and it would be just fine. Obviously, Rushdie believes ignoring basic human rights is not fine, …show more content…

This is effective at showing how religion can make terrible things ethically and “morally” correct, despite in the right minds of a lot of people it wouldn’t actually be. On a similar subject, Oluwaseun was concluding his findings when studying cases in different areas of the world and said how he found that religions actually had a negative effect on societies. He concluded, “Religious theories have become negotiable at the intellectual market and consistently sold to the highest political bidder. These theories have become a radical material force” (Oluwaseun 16). Oluwaseun is using high diction to explain his conclusion of his findings. Using high diction appropriately shows that she is an educated woman and knows what she is talking about and demonstrates great knowledge in the …show more content…

Wilkinson would stray from the other two authors and effectively complicate Rushdie’s argument in his article. In “Imagine There’s No Heaven”, Rushdie is explaining how many conflicts in history, those today and those in the past, have resulted from those of different cultures and religion disagree with one another. He urges, “The victors in that war must not be the closed-minded, marching into battle with, as ever, God on their side” (Rushdie 518). Rushdie’s word choice in this particular sentence helps effectively convey his message. He chooses to have the words “war” and “God” in the same sentence, and it’s ironic because when one thinks of God and religion, they typically think of peace and harmony, and a general heaven-like setting. However, when one thinks of war, they generally think of the exact opposite, with death and destroyed surroundings all around them in a hell-like setting. Rushdie does this to convey his feelings that religion is effectively destroying society and time after time turning men against one another and creating warzones. In addition, he chooses to add “closed-minded” to the same sentence, as he implies that all those who practice religion are close minded and are not open to other ideas, which can be harmful for society, just like war is, which is why Rushdie sincerely believes religion has no place alongside humankind. On the contrary, Wilkinson would disagree with this belief. After stating to his readers that the study he conducted

Open Document