Analysis Of Bloodchild By Olivia Butler

1350 Words3 Pages

Olivia Butler writes in the afterword of “Bloodchild” that it’s not a story of slavery, and evidence from close reading can be used to support this statement. Butler uses the human form as a vehicle for defamiliarization to show the mechanical functions readers serve themselves and others. Furthermore, this process is able to reveal their passive nature and ultimately highlight the human allowance for manipulation. She brings light to these behaviors by showing a lack of respect for human life, an unbalanced power relationship between the Tlic and the humans, and Gan’s stripped cognitive process. Although readers connect with a similar form and the “Terran” name, humans are identified as not respecting the intrinsic value of being human. “And toward the end of his life, when he should have been slowing down, he had married my mother and …show more content…

“For several seconds, I stood in front of the closed door wondering why I suddenly felt afraid” (Butler 13). Gan feels something T’Gatoi didn’t imbue, so he knows it must be wrong. Gan now has a feeling he knows what “afraid” is, but he’s still unsure of how to express that. In conclusion, readers identify with the human form and use it as a vehicle for defamiliarization to show the mechanical functions they serve themselves and others. The characters in “Bloodchild” behave as part of a process and show a lack of respect for their human qualities. As they desensitize their bodies, they allow the Tlic to engage with them in an unbalanced power relationship. Then, the Tlic interact with them in a sheltering way and inhibit their thought process. Through this interaction chain, Butler effectively conveys that the way humans treat themselves will dictate how others treat them. As the afterword said, “Bloodchild” is not about slavery; it’s about the relationships humans take on because they allow themselves to be

Open Document