Empathy In Human Development

1566 Words4 Pages

Every Wednesday, I walk to work along Sheridan Road off the Lawrence Red Line stop. Each Wednesday, without fail, there is a man, disheveled and seemingly dejected, sitting in his wheelchair in the middle of my path. The first thing I notice is that he is missing a foot and the empty pant leg dangles over the dirty wheels. As I pass, he will sometimes ask for money, while mumbling unintelligibly, or just stares at the ground until I walk past him. This sad scene evokes a rising concern in me that emerges every time I see another suffering human. However, how many times have I given this man money or words of support? The truthful answer is never. The fear of being mugged or harassed as a young woman walking alone in an urban city neighborhood …show more content…

Humans have almost always had the ability to feel what each other is feeling. However, empathy is a relatively new term that stems from the German word Einfühlung. By the 19th century, most humans were starting to become aware of this aspect of human nature that compassionate and perspective-taking come from, according to the book “Empathy and Its Development”. There are two types of empathy: affective and cognitive. Affective empathy refers to our despondence to other people’s mental state, such as feeling sympathy when seeing a starving child on television. Cognitive Empathy is human’s ability to understand different perspectives and mental states. Rather than helping for the sake of self-interest or heroic recognition, scientists now argue that both forms of empathy are an integral part to humanity. Without empathy, it would be challenging to relate to others, thus dehumanizing others and promoting the causes for violence. In the Ted Talk “The Empathic Civilization”, Jeremy Rifkin states, “All humans are soft-wired with mirror neurons so that, if I 'm observing you, your anger, your frustration, your sense of rejection, your joy, whatever it is, and I can feel what you 're doing, the same neurons will light up in me as if I 'm having that experience myself”. The biological reasoning behind this social aspect of human nature reveals that …show more content…

One of most anti-war paintings in the world is “Guernica” by Pablo Picasso, which illustrates scenes of horror during the bombing of Guernica, a village in the north of Spain during the Spanish Civil war. The painting itself is a montage of grotesque figures screaming in agony while being stabbed, holding their dead child, or their limbs being severed from their bodies. Since its first exhibition, “Guernica” has gained status as a symbol of peace and the tragedy of war. People elevated this painting to world-wide popularity because they “witnessed” how ugly and terrible war can be even if they never heard of Guernica, Spain. For most centuries, war was something that happened, but always seemingly removed from the “innocents”. War was a game for powerful leaders and men to play out on their battlefields far from their homes (though of course, many civilians were usually caught up in these spats). Guernica challenged the popular “distancing” attitude of the majority of the world who had never personally been in a war. People saw themselves in the “innocents” being slaughtered in the painting by outlandish animal figures and spears. They realized that war is a nightmare that could become a reality to anyone of them. Their empathic need to elevate “Guernica” into fame to gain more public awareness for the cause is a prime example of social justice’s role in

Open Document