Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
military leadership accountability
discussing the history and purpose of War Poetry
discussing the history and purpose of War Poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: military leadership accountability
The way that Rosenberg chose to present the war through his poem expresses his dislike for the whole effort. Picturing the fact that a simple rat could be seen as an enemy due to it being on both sides of the war in an obvious hyperbole, but this device is used as a way for Rosenberg to express his beliefs that the war has gone too far. Line 7 states “Droll rat, they would shoot you if they knew” (Rosenberg 2030) when referring to how a rat can easily cross between two opposing sides of the war. He expresses how the rat is not a part of the war and a small sense of jealousy towards that rat can be seen through other lines of the poem. As Tomas Staley said when speaking about Rosenberg “as the war became the universe of poetry, the power of …show more content…
Brooke’s poem The Soldier presents a differing view about the war when compared to Rosenberg’s who thought of the war in a negative light. Brooke actually was all for the war and had a very positive view of it, so that is the way that he chose to represent it in his poem. In lines 13-14, he states “And laughter, learnt of friends; and gentleness/ In hearts at peace, under an English heaven.” The whole poem is written in a positive tone using happy diction that presents war in a completely different light than how Rosenberg presented it. Brooke thinks of war as something that is wonderful in a way. It lets men fight for the country that they love and represent England, which he views as a great nation. This love of his nation can be from the chances of greatness he was given in life. Good schooling and a chance for a successful career. Everything else in Brooke’s life seemed to be going well and seemed to offer a good turn out, so in Brooke’s mind the war would have this same effect. He had no reason to not the view the war as anything but …show more content…
Something that Lockerd said was “Far from condemning the war, which he never lived to fight in, his poems actively affirms not only its necessity but its desirability” (Lockerd 4). Though he was not part of the war in the sense of fighting in it, he was completely in support. And, this support can very likely be attributed to Brooke’s pure nationalism. Lines 7-8 of the poem say “A body of England’s, breathing English air/ Washed by rivers, blest by suns of home” (Brooke 2019). This line can be interpreted as meaning that as long as one is with English people in the war, nothing will truly be corrupt or bad. This presents not only a positive outlook on the war, but a positive outlook on the English people. At the beginning of World War I, patriotism was common and even expected. People were all for the war which was reflected in a lot of poetry around the time that The Soldier was written. “In 1914 the British Army… was made up of professionals and then volunteers” (Welch). This was as opposed to the armies of continental Europe whose members had little choice about going to war. And because of the way the armies were made up, Brooke also felt it was right to honor the soldiers that were a part of the army. In lines 9-10, “And, think, this heart, all evil shed away/ A pulse in the Eternal mind, no less” (Brooke 2019). This can be taken to mean that the soldiers who died, no matter who they were or what they did,
Soldier Boys is a nonfiction book written by Dean Hughes. It was published in 2001, it is a book that was written about two boys during war time. There are two settings in this book, each of them are at the training camps where both of the characters are training. The main idea of this book is that two boys that wanted to be war heroes realize when they get there that it is nothing like they heard of it being like.
Soldier's Heart Essay I will be doing a four hundred word essay on the book “Soldier's Heart” that was assigned to us in class. The book was written by Gary Paulsen, the author of Soldier's Heart. The book genre is nonfiction since it was based on how the war was at the time this war was being fought, but at the same time it was a little bit of historical fiction since the book wasn't exactly the same as the war was. The main character, Charley Goddard, was a real person.
In this excerpt from an email written to friends and family, an American soldier describes what it is like to live in Iraq while serving his country. The Soldier describes his living conditions thoroughly and offers many examples. Through the usage of rhetorical strategies like imagery, chronology, and he puts the reader in his position, he tells of his experience and his attitude towards it.
As he never actually reached the front line, Brooke’s form of idealistic imagery was fueled by the extensively patriotic propaganda of the time. Death as a theme in ‘The Soldier’ is therefore depicted simply as more of an accepted cost for the country, with Brooke envisioning dying itself, rather grandly as leaving ‘Some corner of a foreign field…forever England.’
In this poem written by Owen, the events of a typical day in the war is detailed and described to show that war is not as glorious and honorable as those back home picture it. The title, meaning 'how sweet and fitting it is to die for one's country', is actually very sarcastic and depicts the feelings of many of those that were fighting. The first stanza sets the scene and show what the soldiers would be feeling at the time. The men's condition at the time was so wretched th...
In conclusion, depending on the position from which one views war, the standpoint may vary ranging from being supportive of the soldiers because those who die are dying for the country or they are completely unsupportive of war activities because it is a brutal and gruesome experience involving countless unnecessary injuries and deaths. Affected by a number of factors, the authors of the two poems have chosen opposing standpoints on the issue of war where Tennyson glorified it with the main message that it is an honour to die for one's country whereas the other, Owen suppresses the idea of war by illustrating all the horrid experiences of a soldier.
Wilfred was very much against the war, as can be shown in his poem because he uses his language to show the reader that the war is not a gam
Many people question if Guy Sajer, author of The Forgotten Soldier, is an actual person or only a fictitious character. In fact, Guy Sajer in not a nom de plume. He was born as Guy Monminoux in Paris on 13 January 1927. At the ripe young age of 16, while living in Alsace, he joined the German army. Hoping to conceal his French descent, Guy enlisted under his mother's maiden name-Sajer. After the war Guy returned to France where he became a well known cartoonist, publishing comic books on World War II under the pen name Dimitri.
... which appeals to the reader’s sense of patriotism and national pride. Combined with “vivid imagery,” Brooke protrays the sudden deaths with a sense of romanticism or unrealistic feelings, comparing death to the natural world. His use of romanticism is prevalent because he “caught the optimism of the opening months of the war with his wartime poems, published after his death, which expressed an idealism about war that contrasts strongly with poetry published later in the conflict” (“Rupert Brooke (1887-1915)”). Brooke was unable to capture the actual scenes of World War One and only lived one year into the war. His naivety causes him to write unrealistically about death and incorperates this into his frequent theme of death with honor. Brooke, like many pre World War One Georgian poets, utilizes sentimentality and romanticism to appeal to the audience’s emotions.
It is evident that the socio-cultural context in which Wilfred Owen operated had a powerful impact upon his poetic motivation and the messages he conveyed through his work. Before exploring Wilfred Owen’s work we first must understand the society that Wilfred Owen lived in, to be able to really understand appreciate his poems and their impact on society. At the time in which he operated, Britain’s public opinion on warfare and conflicts were astonishingly positive, especially in the early stages of WW1. These false perception on war led the vast majority of male citizens to perceive war recruitment as an opportunity to set off on ‘terrific adventures’ and earn immense amounts of honour for their families and nation. Government propaganda meant that soldiers believed that they were gathering fame and fortune in the name of Great Britain. This cruel and false perception of warfare which in turn led to a steady rate of volunteers for the war and included Wilfred Owen himself. The men who did not go and fight for their nations were perceived by society as cowards as
The poet Wilfred Owen was one of many poets who were against war. He reflected this idea of anti-war in his poems, one of his poems called “Anthem for Doomed Youth”, mirrors most aspects of war all put together in this short still deep poem. An example of that would be when the speaker stated,” What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?”(1) The speaker asks is there any sound that marks our soldier’s death other than the sounds of church bell’s which are mostly rung to represent somebody’s absence? Clearly, the speaker sets anger as the tone of the poem through this question to show that soldier’s death is unremarkable.. The speaker compares the soldiers to a “cattle” which illustrates that soldiers are treated more like animals with no feelings and also shows how they are killed indiscriminately in war. Finally the line ironically contains an iambic pentameter which is a natural rhythm for such dark, grim, dull subject. The two novels, The Red Badge of Courage by Stephen Crane, and All Quiet on The Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque, both present a similar idea of how soldiers are killed out there in the front comprehensively and the dehumanization of war towards its soldiers. The first novel is set during the Civil War, and it focuses on the psychological aspects of one soldier named Henry Fleming and how his naive thoughts about war constantly change through the course of the novel. The second novel presents the life of a soldier named Paul Baumer and his friends who were faced with the terribleness of war and how severely it affected their lives. The Red badge of Courage and All Quiet on The Western Front are similar in the way of how the main characters develop through the novel to change from naïve and innocent men ...
Ultimately, we have two poems which can be compared on the grounds of their subject, but are poles apart regarding their message. The structure of these poems is not what would be typically expected from a war poem, but are structured on the basis of these typical structures in order to create some sense of familiarity. Brooke’s poem expands on this familiarity while Owen attempts to deliberately sabotage it. In regards to content, Brooke shows throughout his perception of the nobility of dying for one’s country, whilst Owen uses all of his poetic techniques to show the opposite.
The Relevance of The Dead and The Soldier by Rupert Brooke in Modern Society In the poems, "The Dead" and "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke, the two poems are related to modern society by the current issue such as the war in Iraq, which is still the largest issue that people see, hear and talk about. In the poems, the main themes, which relate to modern society, are patriotism, expecting to die and that death in war is a glorious thing to some people. In "The Dead", the theme of patriotism is shown by "…gave up the years to be of work and joy…" This quote means that they sacrificed their lived for their home country, England. Patriotism in this quote is shown as they died for their country till the end of their lives.
The story has different elements that make it a story, that make it whole. Setting is one of those elements. The book defines setting as “the context in which the action of the story occurs” (131). After reading “Soldier’s Home” by Ernest Hemmingway, setting played a very important part to this story. A different setting could possibly change the outcome or the mood of the story and here are some reasons why.
World War One had an inevitable effect on the lives of many young and naive individuals, including Wilfred Owen, who, like many others, joined the military effort with the belief that he would find honour, wealth and adventure. The optimism which Owen initially had toward the conflict is emphasised in the excerpt, in which he is described as “a young poet…with a romantic view of war common among the young” (narrator), a view which rapidly changed upon reaching the front. Owen presents responders with an overwhelming exploration of human cruelty on other individuals through acts of war and the clash of individual’s opposed feelings influenced by the experiences of human cruelty. This is presented through the horrific nature of war which the