To Descartes there is a clear distinction between imagination and pure understanding. For an example of understanding he uses a triangle, he knows that a triangle no matter how big or small, will have three sides and other properties associated with it. He can also imagine a triangle in his mind using his imagination. He also accepts that the imagination isn 't infinite and has a weakness, that it is limited by the body 's senses. He uses a thousand sided figure as an example because if you try and imagine a figure with a thousand sides it is practically impossible unless you have actually seen a figure with a thousand sides. However, he can still understand the properties of a thousand-sided figure even if he cannot imagine it. After going over imagination and understanding Descartes begins to establish that the imagination isn 't an essential component of the mind since he could still exist without being able to imagine. He uses this as a reasoning for imagination relying on something other than the mind itself for e...
... middle of paper ...
...ion however a mind without a body is still a mind and can still think. Many other people will choose to believe Ryle 's argument simply because dualism doesn 't describe nonphysical entities with absolute certainty, however, just because something can 't be proven to exist that doesn 't mean it doesn 't not exist. In my point of view if you can 't prove something doesn 't exist then it exist until you can prove it false.
To Conclude I have attempted to describe Descartes belief that the mind and body are separate but work together as a single unit within the body. Ryle on the other hand argues that the mind and body are not separate and that Descartes made a category-mistake and mistook the mind for a single entity when it actually hand multiple components. I disagreed with Ryle 's argument because he has no proof that the mind as a unit with the body doesn 't exist.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Rene Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes set the groundwork for seventeenth century rationalism, the view opposed by the empiricist school of thought. As a rationalist, Descartes firmly believed in reason as the principal source of knowledge. He favoured deduction and intellect over the senses and because of this he did not find comfort in believing that his opinions, which he had developed in his youth, were credible. It is for this reason that Rene Descartes chose to “raze everything to the ground and begin again from the original foundations,” (13).... [tags: rationalism, doubt, knowledge]
1319 words (3.8 pages)
- In Anselm’s “Proslogion” and Descartes’ “ Meditations on First Philosophy,” Anselm and Descartes offer their own answers to one of the most important questions in life, which is whether God exists. I will point out similarities and differences in the two arguments, and I will argue why Descartes ‘proof’ is more persuasive. Anselm’s argument for the existence of God is quite simple. He first proclaims that humans can grasp in their mind “something than which nothing greater can be thought” (Anselm 7).... [tags: Ontology, Metaphysics, Existence, Logic]
904 words (2.6 pages)
- In Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, he talks about the distinction between God and existence. This paper is going to argue that in Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, both are contrasting how we know that God really exists and how we know what we perceive in this world actually exists as well. This essay will start by talking all about Rene Descartes and his ideas around the existence of God and life itself with everything living in it. Rene Descartes is putting forward an argument that everything we perceive in life is true when he says; “And thus I now seem able to posit as a general rule that everything I very clearly and distinctly p... [tags: literary analysis, rene descartes]
1125 words (3.2 pages)
- Within Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes undertakes a worthy goal: the discovery of the sources of doubt with the ultimate result being more truthful opinions, assertions, and arguments. Descartes was well ahead of his times, forging a pathway to more rigorous scholarship through the casting of doubt upon his “opinions”. Unfortunately, however, Descartes was either unable or unwilling to cast doubt upon his primary source of fallibility: his exaltation of all things cerebral and his concurrent disdain for the physical body.... [tags: Descartes, Book Analysis, Philosophy]
1443 words (4.1 pages)
- This Essay Could be in a Different Reality Than You: An Analysis on Descartes’ Dream Theory The idea that reality, is in fact a dream (or simply not what we perceive it to be) is seen time and time again in our culture. Alice in Wonderland, The Matrix, and even Buffy the Vampire Slayer are all examples of how much influence this idea that we are living in a dream-like, revers-reality environment has affected us, as a culture. However, one of the original perpetrators of this science-fiction-esque theory was René Descartes.... [tags: Dreaming, Dream, Meditations on First Philosophy]
1527 words (4.4 pages)
- In the book "Meditations on First Philosophy", author talks about knowledge and doubt. He considers doubt and knowledge a very strong tool and thus, states a philosophical method which is actually an extraordinarily powerful investigation of mind, body and rationalism. He formulates six meditations in this book, where he first discards all of his previous beliefs where things are not completely certain and then he tries to build things that can be surely known. He believed that people should do their own discerning and by using the process of simple mathematics, they could proceed on a path to an unquestioned knowledge.... [tags: Mind, Ontology, Meditations on First Philosophy]
1031 words (2.9 pages)
- Throughout the six meditations on First Philosophy, French philosopher Rene Descartes seeks to find a concrete foundation for the basis of science, one which he states can only include certain and unquestionable beliefs. Anything less concrete, he argues will be exposed to the external world and to opposition by philosophical sceptics. The sense of the Cartesian reform is the imposition of a new method of thinking. Descartes’ method to begin with is reductive, removing all knowledge acquired without control, to become analytical, putting forward any knowledge in a process of division to present simple elements, those which are clear and distinct.... [tags: Philosophy]
1342 words (3.8 pages)
- The Free Will in Meditations on First Philosophy by Descartes I In Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes takes the reader through a methodological exercise in philosophical enquiry. After stripping the intellect of all doubtful and false beliefs, he re-examines the nature and structure of being in an attempt to secure a universally valid epistemology free from skepticism. Hoping for the successful reconciliation of science and theology, Descartes works to reconstruct a new foundation of absolute and certain truth to act as a catalyst for future scientific research by “showing that a mathematical [rational-objective] physics of the world is attainable by creatures with our intellectua... [tags: Philosophy Philosophical Descartes Essays]
3757 words (10.7 pages)
- Introduction In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy he proposes several arguments regarding human perception. He begins this exploration by examining the principles that his beliefs are founded on. By doing this, Descartes is choosing not to question each of his beliefs individually; he is choosing to examine the foundation of his perceptions. Descartes proceeds to question where he has attained his knowledge. The answer, he decides, is from his senses. Descartes also determines that there have been instances where his senses have been deceptive.... [tags: Perception, Mind, Sense, Cognition]
1000 words (2.9 pages)
- The Logical Fallacies of Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy includes a proof for the existence of material objects, such as trees. Descartes accomplishes this by first doubting all things, from which he learns that he can be certain of nothing but his own existence as a thinking thing. From this established certainty, Descartes is able to provide proof for the existence of God, and, finally proof of the existence of material objects. Descartes’ proof of God, however, from which the proof of material things is made possible, is suspect: the proof relies on knowledge of clear and distinct ideas but knowledge of clear and distinct ideas... [tags: Philosophy Religion Essays]
2340 words (6.7 pages)