The Advantages Of Porter's Generic Strategies In Business

1056 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: what is five forces analysis

In this millennia, there are a lot of emerging businesses with many pros and cons of it. One of the main advantages for consumers is that they would have a lot of choice. The downside of having numerous emerging businesses is the competition of an industry would be stiffer. Therefore, Michael Porter, a professor based currently at Harvard Business School, has developed a universal strategy for any businesses which is known as Porter’s Generic Strategies. (Harvard Business School, n.d.) Porter’s Generic Strategies come after Porter’s Five Forces model which is introduced to help a business understands their situation and it is useful to recognize a business’ strength about the current competitive position. (MindTools, n.d.) The strategies are divided into 3 sections which is cost leadership, differentiation and focus. The focus section …show more content…

Even though this four competitive strategies is considered generic, it would not suit every business such as small businesses. Secondly, I could use the Five Forces Analysis to understand in detailed the nature of my business. After getting the details, I would compare the results of both analysis to make the best decision. Say that I would choose to use the differentiation plan, I would set up a committee to fulfil the things that an organization needs in order to succeed in this plan. I will send some people in the research and development department to go training so they will gain more experience and can apply it to our business. Next, I will personally make sure that they will be providing the best products and services by making a frequent spot checks. Hiring the right people for sales and marketing is essential. Therefore, I would be the one who will be hiring the head of the said

Show More
Related

  • Lincoln Electric Company

    1203 Words  | 3 Pages

    In determining the competitive intensity and attractiveness of the market, Porter’s five forces is a framework that would help analyze the manufacturing industry of Lincoln Electric and observe the external and internal environmental factors that influence business strategy development for companies within the industry. The five forces are assumed to determine competitive power in a business situation in which these five forces are Supplier Power, Bargaining Power, Competitive Rivalry, Threat of Substitution, and Threat of New Entry.

    Read More

  • Lowes’ Porter's Five Forces Competitive Analysis

    1086 Words  | 3 Pages

    Porter’s Five Forces is defined as threats of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, power of buyers, the threat of substitutes and rivalry among existing competitors. New entrants into the industry aim to gain market share from rivals, so the intensity of competition may require to make changes on current strategy of marketing to maintain existing market share. The bargaining power of suppliers is one of the threats on the industry where price changes or product quality by suppliers can impact the profitability. Therefore, it is important for the companies to keep alternate suppliers or a contract to ensure prices, quality and quantity of the product so to avoid the company's supply from falling behind. The power of buyers can force the companies to lower the prices and offer different type products and service. Buyer can threaten the company with the competitors which may cause a negative impact on the bottom line to the companies. Thus, it is important to create a loyalty market share to avoid this threat. The threat of substitutes increases when another industry offers a similar product or services to customers within the same industry with a lower price. In this case, the industry profitability sinks since the product is available at a better price. This threat forces most competitors to price match or better performance. Rivalry among existing competitors ...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Porter's Generic Strategy Typology

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Parnell, Porter’s generic strategy typology consist of a “basic economic assumptions about cost versus differentiation, and the whole notion of focus and market orientation but this strategy has some limitation” (2014). This strategy typology helps to simplify a complex industry by identifying and emphasizing the key strategic factors. These factors are low-cost with focus, low-cost without focus, differentiation without focus and differentiation with focus.

    Read More

  • Discussing Optus' Competitive Market Position by Using Porter's Five Forces Model

    1765 Words  | 4 Pages

    Porters Five forces model is an analytical tool developed by Michael E. Porter in 1979 whilst he was studying at Harvard Business School. Understanding Ports Five Forces brings to light an industry’s current profitability and develops a framework for making educated calculations for anticipating and influencing the competition. Porter wished to create a universal framework which can be utilized in all industries such as the automobile and performing arts industries. The model has five key components which highlights a market’s competitive intensity and overall attractiveness. The strongest force or forces determine the profitability of the industry and form the basis for the strategies that are utilized by the company. The five components of the model are the degree of rivalry; the threat of new entry; the threat of new substitutes; buyer power and the supplier power. Porter describes the five forces as creating a significant framework for different industries such as the fierce rivalry and strong buyer power in the aircraft industry but with relatively benign threat of entry, threat of substitutes and supplier power. Porter envisioned the model to extend the knowledge of Industrial Organisation. The forces explain how a company organises itself in order to satisfy the needs of the consumers with both quantity and quality, while at the same time maintai...

    Read More

  • Ten Practical Implications of Porter’s Work

    1670 Words  | 4 Pages

    Magretta, J. (2012). Understanding Michael Porter: The Essential Guide to Competition and Strategy. Harvard Business Press. Retrieved from http://common.books24x7.com.ezp-01.lirn.net/toc.aspx?bookid=45565

    Read More

  • Turning Kraft's Strengths Into Opportunity

    1742 Words  | 4 Pages

    When a firm sustains a profit that exceeds the average for its industry, the firm is said to possess a competitive advantage over its rivals. The goal of much of business strategy is to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage (SCA). (QuickMBA, 2007) Michael Porter identified basic types of advantages used by businesses. Cost and differentiation advantages are positional advantages used by organizations to achieve that competitive through creating superior value for its consumers and thus increase profits for itself. In this session long project I will discuss strategic plans including; low cost, differentiation, focus, and preemptive. By comparing each strategic plan with one of Kraft’s SWOT elements, I will discuss a tactic for taking advantage of strength, opportunity, or managing a threat or weakness, and ultimately recommending which strategic plan in order to achieve SCA.

    Read More

  • What Does Michael Porter's Five Forces Model Attempt To Explain?

    1191 Words  | 3 Pages

    Michael Porter’s Five Forces is a model used to explain how the factors of the industry influence strategies and provide competitive advantages for organizations. The first force, a threat of entry, determines potential new entrants to the industry. This may give existing firms the opportunity to get ahead of potential competitors before they enter the market and create barriers for potential entrants. The rivalry is the second force, which drives organizations’ strategies to imitate current competitors’ strategies. The threat of substitute products is a force that affects the financial strategies of firms.

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Acquisition of Creative Design by Hammond Cards, Inc.

    2358 Words  | 5 Pages

    Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard business review, 86(1), 25-40.

    Read More

  • An Overview of Business Strategies

    2251 Words  | 5 Pages

    There are four main business strategies that can be used they are Cost leadership strategy, Differentiation strategy, Focus strategy (low cost) and Focus strategy (differentiation). We can use Porter’s generic business strategies to understand the difference in these strategies.

    Read More

  • The Limitations of Porter’s Six Forces Model in Industry

    1271 Words  | 3 Pages

    Until the introduction of a “sixth force” in the mid-nineties, the “Porter’s Five Forces Model” as it was originally developed by Michael E. Porter in 1979 explained how “five competitive forces” determine industry attractiveness. Porter opined that in the fight to sustain long-term profitability, a firm must be strategic towards competition, and beyond competition, keep tabs on a broader set of competitive forces; customers who can drive prices down, suppliers who exercise some level of power, new entrants who might come in to compete for profits and substitute products and services that essentially place constraints on the profitability and growth on any industry. With the extension of this model, the sixth force (as shown in exhibit 1) included showed the impact of complimentary products and services on the attractiveness and overall profitability of an industry. In general, the Six Forces model proposes that the underlying structural drivers of any industry determine the performance of the players.

    Read More

  • Starbucks: Foreign Market and Diversification

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thompson, A.A., Strickland, A.J., & Gamble, J. E. (2010). Crafting and executing strategy: The quest for competitive advantage: Concepts and cases: 2009 custom edition (17th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill-Irwin

    Read More

  • Difference Between Porter And Miles And Snow's Strategy Typology

    736 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both Porter and Miles and Snow’s strategy typologies are based on the concept of strategic equifinality, or the ability for firms to be successful via differing managerial strategies (Hambrick, 2003, p. 116). Porter 's strategy is more generic while Miles and Snow’s is more specific in nature. Porter’s generic strategy typology is based on economic factors centering on the source of a firm’s competitive advantage and the scope of a firm’s target market (González-Benito & Suárez-González, 2010). Porter’s typology emphasizes a firm’s cost, product differentiation or non-differentiation and market focus. When utilizing Porter’s strategy typology, a firm must first decide to target its products toward the mass market versus a market niche or focus. Secondly, a firm will determine if it wishes to minimize costs or differentiate its products with differentiation meaning that firms will most likely forego lower costs (Parnell, 2014, p. 184). This can lead a firm to develop a myriad of strategies between these options. Strategies which may have or not have focus, may or not be differentiated, may or not be low cost or any combination of strategies. In contrast to Porter, Miles and Snow’s typology is more specific in nature.

    Read More

  • Airline Sustainable Competitive Advantage

    1432 Words  | 3 Pages

    Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard business review, 25-40.

    Read More

  • Prada: A Case Study

    2831 Words  | 6 Pages

    Porter, M. E., 1999. The Five Forces that Shape Competitive Strategy. Harvard business review, p. 80.

    Read More

  • Critical Reflection of the Porter Five Forces Concept

    1474 Words  | 3 Pages

    In a world of free trade, growing competition and accessibility to foreign markets, the need for methodical market analysis and assumptions is steadily rising in today’s business environment. It is just a normal way of thinking to primarily intent to eliminate the financial before entering a new and foreign market. This suggests that enterprises have to develop an overall strategy for their business in order to gain competitive advantage and consequently market share. With the words of Michael E. Porter, professor at Harvard University and leading authority on competitive strategy, this desirable market success is indirectly linked to the individual structure of a market. The unique structure of a single market influences the strategic behaviour and the development of a competitive strategy within a firm. The competitive strategy finally decides whether a company performs successfully on the market or not. Referring to this interpretation of business success, M. E. Porter established his five forces framework that enables directives to gather useful information about the business environment and the competitive forces in industries.

    Read More

More about The Advantages Of Porter's Generic Strategies In Business

Open Document