Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social classes of victorian england
Social classes of victorian england
Views of women in the Victorian era
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social classes of victorian england
The novel is telling a real experience of Moll Flanders about her entire life in 18th century in London and in America. She spends her whole life to become a gentlewoman by getting wealthy and trying to achieve a high social status. On the path she was pursuing those; she has to give up so many things; including love, self-respect, religion, and peace of mind, and all the decisions that she had made were just in order to satisfied her vanity and pride. Moll began her life in the low class. She was abandoned by her born mother, a transported felon in Newgate Prison. Her mother left her when she was only a baby, and in English society during that time of period, there was little chance for such a girl like Moll to escape this class. But Moll …show more content…
However, all stories are started off with Moll’s “greed”. When she was fourteen years old, the kind nurse gets sick and died, and Moll starts living with a gentle woman and her family. The elder brother in the family used all the tricks and seduced her into become his secret lover. “’I’ll take care of you……here’s an earnest for you,’ and with that he pulls out a silk purse with a hundred guineas in it, and gave it to me; ‘and I’ll give you such another,’……so that I could not say a word, and he easily perceived it; so putting the purse into my bosom, I made no more resistance to him, but let him do just what he pleased, and as often as he pleased.”(Defoe 29). Unfortunately the older brother didn’t marry her, and Moll ended up with married his younger brother, which Moll doesn’t love at all. The husband died five years later after they got married. They have two kids and both of them were taken off by Moll’s husband’s parents. About giving her babies away, Moll seems feel happy about it, she feels like she finally drops the burden off, and she is free now. When I was reading the stories, I am picturing it if I was Moll, I would not get married if I don’t love that guy. But why Moll keep marrying those guys that she is not that interested in? Now those innocent children are put in misery, they are going to grow up without their mother’s …show more content…
“It was past the flourishing time with me, when I might expect to be courted for a mistress, that agreeable part had declined some time, and the ruins only appeared of what had been and that which was worse than all was this, that I was the most dejected, disconsolate creature alive……I was left perfectly friendless and helpless. In this distress I had no assistant, no friend to comfort or advise me” (Defoe 172). We can’t blame Moll for stealing because she is not voluntary. It was the society, hierarchy don’t give her a chance to let her survive in this horrible situation. As Moll herself said: “Give me not poverty, lest I steal.” (Defoe
To force me to give my fortune, I was imprisoned-yes: in a private madhouse…” (Maria 131-32). These lines from Mary Wollstonecraft’s (1759-1797) unfinished novella Maria, or the Wrongs of Woman substantiates the private operation of the madhouse where the protagonist Maria is confined. The importance of private ownership is that this places the madhouse outside the discourse of law. It is illegitimate yet it is legitimized as it is a symbol of male-dominated state oppression. Parallel to this Bastille becomes the direct symbol of the same repression which is used by Wollstonecraft to depict the predicament of dissenting revolutionary women in the late Eighteenth- century England. The language which she is using is evidently from the French Revolution as we know the symbolic importance of the dreaded tower of Bastille where political ‘criminals’ were imprisoned. So, Wollstonecraft’s objective is to politicize the genre of novel as the other Jacobin women writers- novel, for them, is a vehicle of political propaganda.
Indisputably, Mary Wollstonecraft was one of the most influential figures of Enlightenment, also considered the ‘first feminist’. It is certain that her works and writing has influenced the lives of many women and altered the outlook of some societies on women, evolving rights of women a great deal from what they used to be in her time. It is clear that Wollstonecraft’s arguments and writing will remain applicable and relevant to societies for many years to come, as although there has been progression, there has not been a complete resolution. Once women receive so easily the freedom, rights and opportunities that men inherently possess, may we be able to say that Wollstonecraft has succeeded in vindicating the rights of women entirely.
Women spend years raising young boys, just to have them receive a better education than they posse, this is not an unfair testament to the society that Wollstonecraft lives in. Women simply have no standing in the society no matter what they do or accomplish, they are always considered subordinates to men. According to their society, men will always have the upper hand when it comes to the more useless member of society,
A change in feminism is shown between Wollstonecraft’s essay and Young’s essay. As women first demanded rights, they were coming out of complete dependence on men. Wollstonecraft and other activists fought for the basic right of education for women. As women gained liberty, they began to oppress themselves in the Third Wave of feminism. Wollstonecraft focused on the basic rights of women in her paper, saying “They must be permitted to turn to the fountain of light, and not forced to shape their course by the twinkling of a mere satellite” (Wollstonecraft 5). Here Wollstonecraft is saying that women need to be given the opportunity to get a good education, not just be taught by what their husbands tell them, so they could be their better selves.
In summary, the account for a woman’s femininity is primarily encouraged by man. Wollstonecraft inspires readers as she debates the right for woman equality to man, with most, if not all females agreeing with her argument and powerful ideas. Thus it is possible to conclude that the influence of academic literature does complicate everyday contemporary understanding, as reality of the day has differing points of view in writing. According to the referenced literature, woman in contemporary society are considered are flaw of nature however observed by women unreasonably.
In the 1800’s, women lived under men’s rules and ideologies and were forced to conform to the social “norms” of the time. To women, these rules seemed normal as they were used to them. In the story, Jane is put in a nursery because she is said to be sick and
It is a declaration for the equal rights of man and women. The political significance of Mary Wollstonecraft cannot be overstated—her work is regarded as one of the first greatest feminist treatises in history and is also seen as the first step towards liberal feminism. She fought equality for women in the political sphere, but she also addressed the need for equality in the social, private realm. She emphasized the need for reform in women’s status, education, and maternal duties. In A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Wollstonecraft argues that men and women are born with the same ability to reason. Therefore, men and woman should equally be able to exercise reason and attain knowledge. And conclusively, educated women would ultimately improve society; they would become better wives and mothers (72, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman). She argues that the current education system (i.e. Rousseau’s ideas of women education) restricts women and subjects them into passivity. Women are not perceivably “smart” as men because they have not been given the opportunity to be; women receive a “disorderly kind of education” (46, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman). Women are kept in passivity, forced to superficiality and shallowness. She derides these traits that are seen as inherent to a woman’s nature and asks the powerful question: how are women supposed to contribute to society if they have been reduced to their appearance and bodily function? For a thriving, modern and true civilization to succeed, each and every individual must be encouraged to seek moral and intellectual development, including
Peterson, M. Jeanne. “Gentlewomen at Work.” Family, Love, and Work in the Lives of Victorian Gentlewomen. Indianapolis : Indiana University Press, 1989. 132-161.
“Love and Marriage.” Life in Elizabethan England. Elizabethan.org, 25 March 2008. Web. 3 March 2014.
Astell, Mary. "A Reflections Upon Marriage." The Broadview Anthology of British Literature: The Restoration And The Eighteen Century. Joseph Black [et all]. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 2006. Print. Pages 297-301.
Murstein, Bernard I.. Love, sex, and marriage through the ages. New York: Springer Pub. Co., 1974. Print.
Women had a tough time in the mid 1800’s; in Britain in Particular. They had hardly any rights, could only work certain jobs, and could not vote. Women should have had more right, or just as equal rights as men had. Men were sexist against women; they did not think women could achieve the standards men were held to. It mostly occurred in the lower class, but the lower class and upper class were victims al well. These women were not the wealthiest, but they also were not the poorest, they fell somewhere in between, or average.
Since the very day of her birth, Mathidle has constantly chased after the affluent existence as she fantasizes that women like her friend, Madam Forestier, relish. Through her husband’s invitation to the minister’s gala, she adorns herself in a fine dress and a priceless diamond necklace, and transforms her into a beautiful envied person far from her usual impoverished disposition. However, after she loses the necklace, replaces it, and repays the debts, she finds pleasure within her “new” life as a lower class woman, which is who she was destined to
In regards to Flanders having sex with her own brother it would be difficult to argue that this was a predetermined event considering she truly did not know her husband was of her own flesh and blood. If, indeed, she was aware of the relation and then chose to proceed then one could discus it further in the context of freewill. As for being a whore there is no question that Flanders, especially later in her life, involved herself with such happenings, but for me it was the thievery that seemed to capture the essence of Flanders continual undoing and constant need for penitence. There is no better part of Defoe's work to capture the feelings of utter despondency then when Moll is going to steal for the first time from the apothecary's shop. Defoe prefaces the scene with a few paragraphs where Moll explains her absolute "desolate state". The crime is then set in what James Sutherland explains, "...Moll's first theft he sets the scene with such careful attention to detail that he fixes it in our minds, and gives to it that air of authenticity which, for Defoe, is almost justification of fiction". This is where Defoe's journalistic stylings shine. The reader is indeed in the apothecary and sees Moll's gaffe unfolding before him.
In actuality, she was defiant, and ate macaroons secretly when her husband had forbidden her to do so. She was quite wise and resourceful. While her husband was gravely ill she forged her father’s signature and borrowed money without her father or husband’s permission to do so and then boastfully related the story of doing so to her friend, Mrs. Linde. She was proud of the sacrifices she made for her husband, but her perceptions of what her husband truly thought of her would become clear. She had realized that the childlike and submissive role she was playing for her husband was no longer a role she wanted to play. She defied the normal roles of the nineteenth century and chose to find her true self, leaving her husband and children