The Woman Warrior Lorde Analysis

827 Words2 Pages

Following this event, we see a critical shift in Lorde’s writing and journal entries. Lorde contends “the emphasis upon the cosmetic after surgery reinforces society’s stereotype of women, that we are only what we look or appear, so this is the only aspect of our existence we need to address” (58). Women not only should be afforded prosthesis as a choice rather than requirement, the “ability to act [upon this choice] in public the public domain” is the right to her own story (Heilbrun 17). Considering the previous self-prescribed labels Lorde gave herself, one can envision her unwillingness to confirm to this particular societal pressure. Comparable to the multiple selves Kingston defined for each of her subjects in The Woman Warrior, Lorde …show more content…

Elizabeth Alexander suggests “without resistance, survival and growth are impossible in an unjust world [of socially created norms]” (705). Lorde contends that creating a new voice, a voice of true self, comprised by allowing each individual identity within one’s self to “touch, meet, cross, and blur” rather than accepting a socially created single voice can alter the discourse from othering into acceptance (21). Conforming to the societal expectations of a female’s outward appearance serves as an enabling behavior to the oppressor, however, breaking the silence by embracing differences allows those subjugated to move from being object to being subject (Olson 55). Ironically, women often denounce newly acquired power upon recognizing the violence necessary to maintain it, and are often “criticized for imitating [such] a male activity”, relinquishing them to the delusional belief that “the world and the condition of the oppressed can be changed without acknowledging it (Heilbrun …show more content…

With each of my own labels I, like Lorde, find identity and comfort, as well as, fear and isolation. The narrative dictated to my gender by the dominant masculine sex often blurs finding the true narrative of my life. Consequently, I have often subscribed to the central insight that silence is a response to internalized or wrongful deeds, and therefore silence is required (Olson 57). Such prolonged masculine control finds each one confined in silence to “draw the face of her own fear; fear of contempt, of censure, of some judgment, of recognition, of challenge, of ambition,” and recognize that it is in the silence that we are immobilized not in our differences, but in our silence (Lorde 21-22). Lorde argues “differences within the self is a strength to be called upon rather than a liability to be altered” and allowing differences to work together refute a history of limitation (Alexander

Open Document