For those unfamiliar with Kurt Vonnegut’s writings, many of them are categorized as “science-fiction”, however, many of his stories are not too far from reality. One example of this is Vonnegut’s short story “Harrison Bergeron”. The story illustrates the dangers that lay in trying to form a perfect utopian society. The story shows how total equality can have detrimental consequences. The story revolves around a central theme that creating total equality can be dangerous for society.
The story, “Harrison Bergeron” is set in the future; the year 2081 to be exact and centers on a family of three: Hazel, George, and their 14-year-old son, Harrison. In this world, there are three constitutional amendments that make everyone equal. Agents of
…show more content…
Although the tone remains constant throughout the story, we are able to read through the cracks to get a glimpse at the bigger picture. The tone is calm, however at the same time Vonnegut is using it to show us how eerily depressive and submissive life would be if total equality was implemented into society. From the beginning of the story, tone is set as neither George or Hazel appear to be all that upset that their 14-year-old son, Harrison, has been taken from them and imprisoned. In fact, the tone remains very calm, “It was tragic, all right, but George and Hazel couldn’t think about it very hard” (Vonnegut 27). Another example of tone is set when describing George’s handicap. George is forced to wear a 47-pound bag of birdshot padlocked around his neck but is unable to remove it for fear of imprisonment and fines. Rather than being upset or angry about this, George is resolved to this way of life and states,” I don’t mind it, I don’t notice it any more. It’s just a part of me.” (Vonnegut 28). Throughout the story, the reader continues to feels a depressive, submissive tone especially during the ballet and specifically when the ballerina had to “apologize at once for her voice, which was very unfair for a woman to use. Her voice was a warm, luminous, timeless melody.” (Vonnegut 29). The tone was carried to the very end, suggesting that total equality is dangerous and leads to an empty dull controlled society. Even upon Harrison’s brutal and public execution that Hazel witnesses, Hazel though she cried, she cannot even remember why she cried other than that it was “Something real sad on television.” (Vonnegut 32). This is not the reaction one would expect from a mother who witnessed her son’s death. Although tone helped carry the theme that total equality is dangerous to a society, Vonnegut also used motifs to further illustrate this
Each person has different characteristics about them that give them their own identity and that should not be changed. In the story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, the main character, Harrison Bergeron is known as a threat to society. He is very intelligent, handsome, and athletic. In 2081, every person in the United States is equal. The government has taken over and has required everyone to wear handicaps to make them less smart, less pretty, less strong, and many other things. At the beginning of the story they mention a husband and wife, George and Hazel Bergeron, and they have a son, Harrison, who gets taken away because of his perfections. Later in the story, Hazel and George are watching ballerinas on television, when the program is interrupted by breaking news. They inform the viewers that Harrison has broken out of jail. The program then turns back on and Harrison appears on stage with the ballerinas. He proceeds to take off every
Vonnegut's first rule states that one should "use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or she will not feel the time was wasted." Harrison Bergeron is a story for anyone who lives in today's uptight and busy society. With a total length of 8 pages, the story of Harrison Bergeron explores the issues of equality and cultural issues. The story begins with "The year
Harrison Bergeron is a short story that creates many images and feelings while using symbols and themes to critique aspects of our lives. In the story, the future US government implements a mandatory handicap for any citizens who is over their standards of normal. The goal of the program is to make everyone equal in physical capabilities, mental aptitude and even outward appearance. The story is focused around a husband and wife whose son, Harrison, was taken by the government because he is very strong and smart, and therefore too above normal not to be locked up. But, Harrison’s will is too great. He ends up breaking out of prison, and into a TV studio where he appears on TV. There, he removes the government’s equipment off of himself, and a dancer, before beginning to dance beautifully until they are both killed by the authorities. The author uses this story to satire
Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle once said, “The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” Kurt Vonnegut portrays Aristotle’s philosophy brilliantly in his short story “Harrison Bergeron.” The story depicts the American government in the future mandating physical handicaps in an attempt to make everyone equal. Vonnegut describes a world where no one is allowed to excel in the areas of intelligence, athletics, or beauty. Yet, the inequalities among the people shine even brighter. Vonnegut uses satire to explore the question of whether true equality can ever really exist.
Imagine a society where not a single person competes with another. It has been like this for years, yet nothing has changed since the start of this new world. No new technology, no new occupations, no new discoveries. Absolutely nothing is different. Without competition no one will push themselves to be better or to achieve any goals, and without new achievements society cannot survive, let alone thrive. The short story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. discusses this topic. Set in a society where anyone above average in any way is handicapped, therefore everyone is completely and totally equal. One handicapped man, George’s, son is taken away by the government at the mere age of fourteen under suspicion of rebellious intentions. Another
Vonnegut and Jackson, through the use of well written short stories, have managed to address concerning issues in today’s societies. Through the use of Harrison Bergeron Kurt Vonnegut was able to address the growing issue of equality, this is a very important issue as many people in modern societies view the idea of equality to be incredible. Shirley Jackson through The Lottery addressed the concerning issue of societies blindly following religions and traditions due to superstitions and the unwillingness to change. These dystopian texts demonstrate the inevitable outcome these problems will eventually cause.
Kurt Vonnegut’s science fiction, short story, “Harrison Bergeron” satirizes the defective side of an ideal, utopian American society in 2081, where “everyone was finally equal” (Vonnegut 1). When you first begin to read “Harrison Bergeron”, through an objective, nonchalant voice of the narrator, nothing really overly suggests negativity, yet the conclusion and the narrator's subtle description of the events show how comically tragic it really is. Vonnegut’s use of morbid satire elicits a strong response from the readers as it makes you quickly realize that this scenario does not resemble a utopian society at all, but an oppressive, government and technology-controlled society. “A dystopian society is a
Kurt Vonnegut wrote novels and short stories with a darker tone. Vonnegut was a prisoner of war during World War II. He witnessed the firebombing of Dresden, Germany, which according to him changed his life forever. While a prisoner, he spent a few years working for Nazis in an old meat house where animals were slaughtered. That is where the basis of his novel Slaughterhouse Five came from. Due to the horrible things he took part in during World War II, many of his novels are related to wrong-doings or dysfunctional societies (Smith par 8-9). His short story “Harrison Bergeron” is about a society in the future who is more than controlled by the government. The government wants to make everyone equal and attempts to do so through changing a person’s intelligence level and other minor qualities such as strength or social class. What was interesting was that fact that rather than making the weak stronger, the stronger were made weak. It is clear this is a satirical piece of literature for the reason that when reading this, it is obvious the future was embellished and it was not going to be how the story portrayed it.
To sum up, Vonnegut criticizes an illusion of a utopia by punishing individuality and using technology to control society. The pressure of having a perfect society was important to be sustained. This is still a prevalent issue to this day as many nations struggle to achieve this goal. Vonnegut takes notice of the society’s lies and uses “Harrison Bergeron” to
In the story “Harrison Bergeron, ” by Kurt Vonnegut, the late 21st-century government will force everyone to disconnect within their inner self. Constitutional amendments require everyone to be equal. Handicaps being given are set to take away anything that is at a higher advantage, physically or mentally. The amendments forced laws on everyone to be equal. For instance, certain
Being unique is a necessary part of life. People are told starting as children that they need to be themselves. They are told to do what they love and love what they do. What if the world didn’t allow this? Kurt Vonnegut ponders the idea of a life in which the government enforces complete equality. “Harrison Bergeron” takes place in a future society that hinders people with skills to make everyone equal. This society makes everyone worse instead of better. Complete equality has too many issues for it to be viable. Equality should be for all in the eyes of the law. However, complete equality should not be pursued because taking away the differences between people is a clear mistake.
Due to the futuristic 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, another law comes into play to try to rule and keep society in line. In 2081, the Handicapper General, a woman named Diana Moon Glampers, and the agents of
... book is important because, it makes the reads to question the idea of equality in the society. In addition, it makes the reader compare what is happening in the world today, with the rise of equality issues, and the effects it can have in the society just like the people in Harrison Bergeron were affected. Vonnegut suggests that, total equality is not the best thing to strive for through his writing. He wants his readers to know its effects, and that the quest for equality is disastrous. Harrison Bergeron is a valuable piece of literature that should be read world wide, so that everyone can be able to know what we are getting into with the issue of equality, and the effects of an authoritarian government.
In conclusion, the complete freedom and absolute equality have been a goal of innumerable societies throughout human history. However, these two ideal cannot exist together in their most perfect forms because the perfect forms of either freedom or equality represent total chaos or total oppression, as we can see in “Harrison Bergeron,” the consequences of sacrificing freedom for perfect equality. The author uses the story of this imaginary perfect world where everyone is happy to demonstrate that a society in which total equality exists is not only oppressive, but also inert and unproductive. Using his futuristic scenario, the simplicity of the society, and the actions of his characters, Vonnegut makes his point of view of a repressive society. In addition, societies that try to create total equality have almost always proven to be oppressive, such as China.
Although the comparisons are well hidden, both today’s society and the story ‘Harrison Bergeron’ share similar qualities. They both deal with equality, which leads to problems and consequences. A second similarity is the struggle of competition and trying to prevent it from occurring, which also leads to problems. Lastly, both struggle with normality, and the fact that it’s hard to accept that different is okay now.