Analysis Of Julius Caesar

Analysis Of Julius Caesar

Length: 1468 words (4.2 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
In the play ‘Julius Caesar’ by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, the Emperor of Rome, is murdered during the third Act. It has been suggested that power and the quest for power are the reasons behind his murder. Power is defined as a position of authority or control with the ability to do or act upon you will. The issue to be investigated is whether Brutus, Octavius and Antony became so corrupted in their quest for power that they killed Julius Caesar, so as to gain his power. It has also been suggested that ‘power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely’. However, this is not the only way power affects people. For instance, power could make an individual nobler or more successful, or enable them to help those under their rule. The following shall outline what Brutus, Octavius and Antony do in the play, and explain how power affects these characters.

Brutus, probably the most significant character in the play, is the leader of the group who plans to kill Caesar, although Cassius is the initiator of the plot. Brutus loves Caesar, as Caesar does him, and ironically this is why he kills Caesar – he does not want to see him corrupted by the absolute power he (Caesar) would have if he were king. He gives Caesar the final stab which kills him. He then leads his and Cassius’ army against Antony and Octavius’ and finally kills himself to avenge Caesar’s death.

Caesar was getting so popular with the people that they wanted to crown him king, which would mean he would have absolute power. Brutus knew this, and so he convinced himself that he needed to kill Caesar for once Caesar was king, the absolute power would corrupt him and he would become a tyrant, doing whatever he pleased.

“But for the general. He would be crown’d:
How that might change his nature, there’s the question:
It is the bright day that brings forth the adder,
And that craves wary walking. Crown him that;
And then, I grant, we put a sting in him,
That at his will he may do danger with.
Th’ abuse of greatness is when it disjoins
Remorse from power…
And therefore think him as a serpent’s egg
Which, hatch’d, would, as his kind, grow mischievous,
And kill him in the shell.” (Act 2, Scene I, lines 12–19; 32–34)

So Brutus killed Caesar not for personal gain, but for the perceived good of Caesar and of Rome.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Analysis Of Julius Caesar." 02 Apr 2020

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Friendship In Julius Caesar Analysis Essays

- Throughout Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses the friendships between characters in order to exhibit the complex features and elements that make up the human connection. Whether negative or positive, these sophisticated aspects of friendship are heavily layered throughout the text. One character in particular, Brutus, directly presents this idea via his actions, daily interactions, and conversations with his companions. By doing so, he showcases the idea that friendship has different aspects, and such a theme is prevalent throughout much of the play....   [tags: Roman Republic, Interpersonal relationship]

Research Papers
1341 words (3.8 pages)

Analysis Of The Book ' Persepolis ' And ' Julius Caesar ' Essay

- Mobile Desires Desires are strong feelings of wanting or wishing for something to happen. When a person desires something or someone, their sense of yearning is excited by the satisfaction or the thought of the item or person. If Freud is correct when he argues that, “desire is essentially mobile” then we should be able to see how the desires of both characters Marji in Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi, and Brutus in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare change as a result of those around them (Bennett 207)....   [tags: Roman Republic, Julius Caesar, Julius Caesar]

Research Papers
1066 words (3 pages)

Analysis Of Shakespeare 's ' Julius Caesar ' Essay

- In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Caesar’s potential to rise to dictatorship threatens the Roman Republic, therefore people from the Senate conspire against Caesar and kill him to save Rome. But Rome cascades into chaos, and Brutus and Antony go to war, which ends with the death of more people. The plot of the play sparked a discussion question that was asked in class; the question is: who is innocent and who is to blame. I thought about this question while watching I, Cinna (The Poet). Caesar, Brutus, and Cassius were the three predominant characters the class argued about, but none of them are innocent and they all bear some responsibility in Caesar’s murder....   [tags: Roman Republic, Julius Caesar, Ancient Rome]

Research Papers
1050 words (3 pages)

Rhetorical Analysis Of Julius Caesar 's ' The Battle Of Philippi ' Essay

- Julius Caesar is a play with various roles, but what often is missed is the character who led the plot of the story. Cassius led the plot, and set the conflict and climax for the antagonist(Brutus), and brought the play to its conclusion . In the beginning of Julius Caesar Cassius attempts to persuade Brutus, a much-admired leader, to join him in carrying out the overthrowing of Caesar. He subsequently gained support from the patrician’s as well. By assembling the conspirators meeting in Brutus’ home, It is apparent that Cassius was the one who lead the plot against Caesar....   [tags: Roman Republic, Julius Caesar, Augustus]

Research Papers
736 words (2.1 pages)

Analysis of Marcus Brutus in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare Essay

- In William Shakespeare’s tragic play Julius Caesar, the protagonist, Brutus, conspires against and successfully kills Caesar; to only find the city he loves in chaos and mutiny from his actions. Brutus in the eyes of many people was a noble and honorable man who loved and adored the city of Rome, and no person thought more of this than Caesar. To Caesar, Brutus was the son he never had, and his love of Brutus was known, therefore the thought of Brutus betraying him was absurd. However, imagine if not only Brutus did not love Caesar, but he hated him....   [tags: Julius Caesar Essays]

Research Papers
811 words (2.3 pages)

Analysis Of William Shakespeare 's ' Julius Caesar ' Essay

- I, Cinna (The Poet) is based on a small character in William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar. This modern twist and tragedy is written and directed by Tim Crouch. Tim Crouch wrote this play in hopes to bring to light the importance of being able to express one’s self as well as to encourage the audience to write their own poems about Cinna the Poet. Jude Owusu plays Cinna and does an amazing job during his solo performance. This was exclusively streamed to schools around the UK on July 2, 2012....   [tags: Julius Caesar, Roman Republic, Julius Caesar]

Research Papers
1005 words (2.9 pages)

Analysis Of Mark Antony 's ' The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar ' Essay

- Speeches have been known throughout time to have a great influence on mankind and their actions. For example, Martin Luther King Jr. was known for his great and famous speech bringing about hope and a new beginning for people with different skin colours to live in harmony. Then there 's the other side of the spectrum, where the world has some of Adolf Hitler’s speeches: speeches that caused man to do unspeakable things to other fellow members in of mankind. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given by two of some very influential characters.The speeches by Brutus and Mark Antony resemble the examples given above....   [tags: Roman Republic, Julius Caesar, Mark Antony]

Research Papers
1019 words (2.9 pages)

Julius Caesar´s Death: Analysis Essay

- ... Julius declared himself dictator for life. ("Internet History Sourcebooks.” ) He was not chosen by the people to rule, but by himself. In Rome, kings were not well remembered and people worried that Julius Caesar was becoming as a king. The Senate especially was worried that Caesar was ignoring them and their suggestions for Rome. Rome was a republic at the time and no man was to rule alone, but Caesar had begun to just that. All laws in Rome were passed by the Senate. ( Van Der Crabben, Jan....   [tags: Dictator, Rome, Politics]

Research Papers
560 words (1.6 pages)

Julius Caesar (Superstisions Analysis) Essay

- "Destiny is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice," proclaimed William Jennings Bryan. Many people believe in destiny and fate and a set-in-stone, unbreakable path for their lives. Caesar’s ego warps and distorts his interpretation of various superstitions in Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar. Although he believes in superstition and the supernatural, he selectively chooses his interpretation. Be it a dream, fortune-telling, or a common superstition, it always benefits Caesar, or it just isn’t true....   [tags: essays research papers]

Free Essays
701 words (2 pages)

Analysis Of Julius Caesar Essay

- In the play ‘Julius Caesar’ by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, the Emperor of Rome, is murdered during the third Act. It has been suggested that power and the quest for power are the reasons behind his murder. Power is defined as a position of authority or control with the ability to do or act upon you will. The issue to be investigated is whether Brutus, Octavius and Antony became so corrupted in their quest for power that they killed Julius Caesar, so as to gain his power. It has also been suggested that ‘power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely’....   [tags: William Shakespeare]

Free Essays
1468 words (4.2 pages)

Related Searches

From this we can see that Brutus was on one level a very noble man. Power or the search for power is not the motivation for his actions here.

However, power or the fight for power does destroy his and Cassius relationship. At the beginning of the play they were very close and scheming together very well, but once Caesar was dead and they were seeking equal power over the same army, they started arguing and got angry with each other, to the point that Cassius wanted to die.

Cassius (to Brutus)
I, that denied thee gold, will give my heart:
Strike, as thou didst at Caesar; for, I know,
When thou didst hate him worst, thou lovedst him better
Than ever thou lovedst Cassius. (Act 4, Scene III, Lines 103–106)

It is also power which destroys Brutus in the end. Before Caesar’s death he was relatively happy in his position, but once the power was up for grabs, he unwillingly became involved in the struggle for it. If he did not (become involved) he would be killed by Antony and Octavius anyway. But when his army started losing the battle, to the point where he had to flee, Brutus realised that the only way out for him was to kill himself, which also avenged Caesar’s death. So effectively, it was the search for power which destroyed him, although it was not his motivation for joining in the battle.

Octavius appears after Caesar is killed and along with Antony proclaims himself ruler of Rome. He collaborates with Antony in their quest to kill people who might get in the way of them keeping power, and to help him win the battle. He does this so that he can gain power for himself and keep it, not for anyone else’s benefit.

Octavius’ main aim is to gain power for himself and keep it. Evidence of this is his and Antony’s list of the ‘proscribed’, a list of people to be killed.

“These many shall die; their names are prick’d.” (Act 4, Scene I, line 1)

This list would have included Brutus and Cassius and anyone else who might get in the way of him staying ruler of Rome and having loads of power. This is why he fights against Brutus and Cassius in the battle – he is trying to prevent them from gaining power so he can have it himself. It is evident that the quest for power motivates his actions.

Antony and Octavius proclaimed themselves rulers of Rome, so you would suppose they would have equal power. But Octavius does not seem to think so, as the tries to order Antony around to get him to do what he wants him to.

Octavius, lead your battle softly on,
Upon the left hand of the even field.

Upon the right hand I; keep thou the left.

Why do you cross me in this exigent?

I do not cross you; but I will do so (Act 5, Scene I, Lines 16–20)

He acts more powerful than he actually is. Power does not make Octavius nobler – all he does with it is to try to get more – he is corrupted by it. However, while power does end up making him more successful for a while (he and Antony win the battle) it does destroy his character – he becomes cold and callous toward the end, and only interested in killing the enemy.

Octavius (to Brutus and Cassius)
“Come, come, the cause: if arguing make us sweat,
The proof of it will turn to redder drops.
I draw a sword against conspirators…
Come, Antony; away! Defiance, traitors, hurl we in your teeth.
If you dare fight today, come to the field;
If not, when you have stomachs.” (Act 5, Scene I, lines 48–51; 64–66)

Antony is an interesting character. He is a close friend of Caesar, and is always seen next to Caesar, apart from when Caesar is murdered. He is quite distressed when he finds that Caesar is dead, but he is also angry, and wants to avenge Caesar’s death by killing the murderers. However, he not only wants to avenge Caesar’s death in the battle, he also wants to prevent Brutus and Cassius from gaining power, probably so he can have it himself.

Antony aims to avenge Caesar’s death in the battle. However, it is also evident that he wants power. As stated before, Antony and Octavius proclaimed themselves rulers of Rome after Caesar’s death. It is obvious that he wanted to keep this power, as he was the main player in formulating the death list of anyone who might try to take the power off him. Moreover, the power that he had gained made him dishonest. He wanted to change Caesar’s will, in which Caesar left each citizen seventeen dracmas and all of Rome his estates, because he wanted to cut off some charges in legacies (that is, to pay for some expenses from the legacies in Caesar’s will) to help pay for the upcoming battle.

“But, Lepidus, go you to Caesar’s house;
Fetch the will hither, and we shall determine
How to cut off some charge in legacies.” (Act 4, Scene I, lines 7–9)

He was using a dead man’s money for his own purposes which in no way would benefit anyone else apart from Octavius. This power also made him more successful, as he won the battle against Brutus and Cassius. So while he was motivated to fight Brutus and Cassius by the thought of avenging Caesar’s death, the search for power or the idea of keeping power was also motivation for Antony’s actions. Power also causes Antony to become dishonest, not nobler.

Several major characters in ‘Julius Caesar’, namely Antony and Octavius are motivated by power and the search for power, and Antony becomes dishonest with power. Brutus, on the other hand, acts purely for unselfish reasons, mainly for the good of Rome, not because he wants power. Therefore, it can be seen that power does corrupt but the search for power is not the reason or motivation for everyone’s actions.

Gill, R. (editor). Julius Caesar. Oxford University Press, Oxford. © 1979, Reprinted 1998.

The Phrase Finder: Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely. (14 June 2008).
Return to