Essay PreviewMore ↓
The main point which Schumpeter emphasizes is that capitalism is an evolutionary process. He describes how it is an always moving concept and it "not only is but never can be stationary." Schumpeter goes on to state that the evolutionary process of capitalism is not due to the fact that the "economic life goes on in a social and natural environment," meaning that the main reason for capitalism’s constant evolution is not because of the things like wars and revolutions that pick up or bring now the economy. The reason capitalism is an evolutionary process, he says, is because of the constant spew of new consumers’ goods that are put on the market, new systems of production and/or transportation of all goods, creation of new markets, and new methods of industrial organization. All of these things are creating new goods, or different ways of using and handling them. Schumpeter states that all of these things are ways that capitalism transforms the formation of the economic structure "from within," which continuously creates new structures of the economy while at the same time destroys the old, previous structure that stood before it. Schumpeter emphasizes that this happens every time something new is created or a new way of producing, packaging, transporting or organizing something is created. He coins the term Creative Destruction for this process that he describes and believes it is "the essential fact about capitalism." Furthermore, Schumpeter believes that one cannot assess the economy or capitalism "ex visu" or at one certain point in time. This is because everything that happens does not always make it’s effects clear right away, changes in the economy take "considerable time" to expose their true effects, and he believes that when theorists or government commissioned reports are created they do not try to see the effects of the situation over a period of time. He believes most of these reports only try to understand how "capitalism administers existing structures" but what they should really be doing is understanding how capitalism creates and destroys the existing structures. It is more powerful to understand the capitalistic economy through how something is created and replaced or destroyed over a period of time then it is to understand how it is run when it is existing.
How to Cite this Page
"Analysis Of Joseph A. Schumpeter's Ideas." 123HelpMe.com. 21 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- To What Extent Do You Agree With Karl Marx Theory That Capitalism Will Collapse And Will Be Replaced By Socialism, Given Joseph Schumpeter’s Theory On Creative Destruction. According to the argument of Ravi Batra, a professor of economics at Southern Methodist University, ``excessive income and wealth inequalities are a fundamental cause of financial crisis and economic depression, which will lead to the collapse of capitalism and the emergence of a new social order” . I found this argument very interesting particularly the way the professor authoritatively identified a direct correlation between excessive wealth inequalities and financial crisis which would eventually lead to the collapse o... [tags: Capitalism, Socialism, Joseph Schumpeter]
1327 words (3.8 pages)
- TMC404: Entrepreneurship Robert Seals FDA International Travel & Tourism Management Assignment 1 Case Study Report Case Study 70 Percent Weighting Contents Page: Introduction: Page 1 Section 1: Skills, attributes and behaviours of Entrepreneurs, linking in with theories of entrepreneurs (Case Study) Pages 1-3 Section 2: Personal skills audit linking to skills, attributes and behaviours and how to overcome them. Pages 4-5 Section 3: Environmental scanning for Travel and Tourism Pages 5-7 Conclusion: References: Bibliography: Appendices: Introduction: The aim of this report is to learn more about Entrepreneurs, what skills, attributes and behaviours Entrepreneurs h... [tags: Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneur, Joseph Schumpeter]
3168 words (9.1 pages)
- With the competition of business activities increasing in the 21 Century, entrepreneurial strategies that companies implemented has become the key factor in business development. Encouraged by many marvelous business leaders who make contribution to the accomplishment of their companies, including Jeff Bezos, Lei Jun and Mark Zuckerberg, more and more business people have an aggressiveness to achieve the success of becoming an entrepreneur and master leadership to strive for superiority and realize the value of life.... [tags: Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneur, Joseph Schumpeter]
1306 words (3.7 pages)
- In order to do this, the enterprise has to carefully analyse the market environment. The company’s continued growth comes with a lot of strain on the internal structure of the organization. The management process and style have to be re-evaluated during this growth process. This may involve recruitment of non-owner-managers and development team to take the enterprise through the growth stage, failure to which the business may decline or even collapse. Apple has displayed this in the past with its restructure that first, saw Steve Jobs resigning from the company, and later on re-join it to spectacular success.... [tags: Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneur, Joseph Schumpeter]
1274 words (3.6 pages)
- Narrative and Narrator: An Analysis of Joseph Andrews As the novel was coalescing into a distinct form of literary expression, Henry Fielding introduced a dynamic relationship between the reader and the text by developing the role of the narrator and the narrator's responsibility in shaping the overall structure of the work. His narrative creation would become a tradition explored by modern writers. By establishing the narrator as an intermediary, the narrator was free to create and comment upon characters, actions, and situations.... [tags: Joseph Andrews Essays]
3069 words (8.8 pages)
- Exposure of the Shadows: An Analysis of Joseph Conrad’s Manipulation of Light and Dark Beckoning readers closer, the gloomy foreboding of a mysterious darkness has typically been indicative of an antagonist or a horror that is to follow, and the glory of a shining light has signified a positive connotation. The pair is often utilized to express an author’s ideas and theme and Joseph Conrad uses the two paradigms liberally in his interpretation of European colonialism in Heart of Darkness. While Conrad employs the typical binary of light and darkness as positive and negative forces, respectively, he also challenges this notion by exposing the contradictions of misdeeds done in light and the... [tags: Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness, Colonialism]
1210 words (3.5 pages)
- Creative Destruction The article titled “Schumpeterian competition and diseconomy of scope; illustrations from histories of Microsoft and IBM” by the authors Bresnahan, Greenstein and Henderson is a great attempt to address the creative destruction problem that face organizations mostly in the technology-led and innovation-based industries. In that respect, this paper is a reaction to the authors’ arguments with a view on their focus on diseconomy of scope in addressing the possible cause of the creative destruction problem.... [tags: creative destruction, business economics]
972 words (2.8 pages)
- Literary Analysis of Joseph Heller's Catch 22 Laughing in the face of war and death, literally, is one of the things that make the novel Catch-22 by Joseph Heller such an intriguing and original story. It was written in 1961, a time when, due to the fighting of the Second World War, all war novels were written with a dark and dreary tone, while still trying to continue the pre-conceived romantic notions about war. However, Joseph Heller strips away all of the romantic pretense, and pulling heavily on his own Air Force experience during WWII, presents war in its most raw, un-censored version.... [tags: Heller Joseph Catch 22 Analysis]
1786 words (5.1 pages)
- Analysis of Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad When Joseph Conrad composed Heart of Darkness he created a literary masterpiece which embodied the essence of light contrasting with darkness. Throughout the novel Conrad constantly utilizes the images of light and dark and uses them to mold a vision, which the reader is then able to use to decipher the literal and metaphorical meanings of the novel. As Conrad said, “ my task which I am trying to achieve is, by the power of the written word to make you hear, to make you feel- it is, before all, to make you see.” (Crankshaw 34) In Heart of Darkness Conrad makes the reader “see” by absorbing into every aspect possible of the book images of lightn... [tags: Joseph Conrad Novels Literature Essays]
4388 words (12.5 pages)
- Analysis of Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad Heart of Darkness is a story about Marlow’s journey to discover his inner self. Along the way, Marlow faces his fears of failure, insanity, death, and cultural contamination on his trek to the inner station. Marlow, who goes on his journey to meet Kurtz, already has a fascination with Kurtz after listening to many people along the way. Conrad tries to show us that Marlow is what Kurtz had been, and Kurtz is what Marlow could become. Marlow says about himself, "I was getting savage," meaning that he was becoming more like Kurtz.... [tags: Marlow Heart of Darkness Joseph Conrad Essays]
738 words (2.1 pages)
2. Summarize what evidence the paper itself presents to support this claim.
Schumpeter does not have any concrete data or numbers to support his ideas. With this said he does, although have a few examples and his ideas could be applied to relevant situations of the economy, as it was then. This article was written originally in 1942 when there were many monopolies and oligopolies at the time,(i.e. car manufactures, gas and electric companies, telecommunications companies) which could have been applied to his theories of Creative Destruction through entrepreneurship, although he does not mention the word entrepreneurship it is implied, in a capitalistic economy compared to monopolies and “their popular varients.”
3. Comment on whether you personally find this evidence compelling.
4. Comment on whether you think the idea always holds true, or might vary for different times, countries or groups of people. Explain why that would be the case, if apporiate.
Although there is no specific evidence on to directly support his claim, I would like to comment that I do find his theories and claims extremely interesting. If I would have read this article not knowing when it was written I would have believe that it was written in the present day. I think it is extremely interesting that Schumpeter wrote this in the early 1940s because I think it is tremendously relevant today and in a way it seems like he almost predicted the future. The idea of Creative Destruction, which is essentially entrepreneurship, holds as the today’s process of new technology, goods and the other ways Schumpeter described. It was not from the large existing companies that created, computers, cell phones or any other of the many new technologies of the last two or three decades, but individuals like Bill Gates and the creators of things like eBay that created new products and technology for the world. Although they went on to establish huge corporations they can still be put into Schumpeter’s model that they must beware of the constant threat of someone else coming into their market with something better, more effective and cheaper then what they have. This further motivates them and others to constantly be on the edge of market, trying to have the best service or good available with the most effective production and sale at the best price. It is a constant competition with not only others but themselves if they want to be on the top of their game and their market. So, I think it shows that because this was written over 65 years ago and it can still be applied almost exactly as Schumpeter saw it back then to today, it can be applied for different times. I believe this can be applied to different groups of people because age, race and gender have all been diverse in who has created what in the economy. There is no reason that any of these factors should place an advantage or disadvantage in the free market, because it is whoever can come up with the best and most effective idea or good that will prevail in the capitalistic economy. This may vary for different countries because of the fact that cultures are different and not every country may be as free of a capitalist economy as America or other developed countries. If the countries can establish capitalism, with little corruption or outside disturbance like America I believe that Creative Destruction can prevail in most countries and economies around the world. For the most part, I think Creative Destruction can be applied in most situations, with a few slight changes based on cultural and moral beliefs in different regions; most factors will not affect the base that is Creative Destruction in the capitalistic economy.
5. If you do not find the evidence presented completely compelling, suggest types of evidence that might help sort out whether the idea is valid or not.
Although I believe that this argument is compelling, I think it would help prove his claims if Schumpeter could find some solid evidence or data to complement his paper. I do understand that part of the reason he did not put hard evidence in his paper is because of the very fact that he states the economy cannot be judged at one point in time or a small period. It takes a while to understand certain effects of different things that are placed in the economy, therefore making it difficult to find evidence from a certain time. I think it would be interesting if someone could update this paper and find data on different strategies that were put in place when the paper was written and see their effect it has had in the market since then. I think it would also be interesting to follow entrepreneurs and large monopolies to compare each other in their new production methods, good and other facets which Schumpeter describes.
Schumpeter, J. Harper Brothers. New York, New York: 1950. Excerpt from Chapter VII in
Capitalism, Scoialsim, and Democracy. (The Process of Creative Destruction).