More handpicked essays just for you.
Faulkner barn burning main conflict
William faulkner barn burning literary analysis
Barn burning william faulkner
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the short story “Barn Burning” by William Faulkner, there are two major characters, Sarty who is the narrator and the protagonist, and Abner who is also his father and the antagonist. Abner Snopes is a poor man, with nothing of value, he is a serial arsonist and is known for his fierce wolf-like independence personality which is feared by his family including Sarty, Abner feel he must lash out at the world out of spite and if he been wronged in anyway regardless his fault he will retaliate through arson. This essay will focus on how social class strongly shape and influences Abner choices and actions. Abner Snopes is the patriarch of the Snopes family, a man with a stiff body and a limp leg trying to steal a Confederate horse, yet he embodies a destructive personality that Sarty compares to a wasp “he no more to them than a buzzing wasp: capable of stinging for a moment but that’s all” (Faulkner 191). Unlike his employer or former neighbor, Snopes owns nothing, only some broken possessions including furniture, a wagon and two mules. Snopes and his family work as sharecroppers, workers that tend to a field belonging to the landowner, paying in rent through the crops they harvest. Snopes live an unfortunate and …show more content…
Sarty is intimidated but loyal to his father. Abner is disliked by everyone except his family even the family is disliked by the local townspeople, immediately after being expelled and preparing to leave, a boy hissed at the Snopes labeling them “barn burner!” (Faulkner 189) revealing the Snopes reputation to the local townspeople. As cited earlier Sarty compared Abner to a wasp, stinging and harrassing for a moment and Sarty is happy that his father is away from
In Garland’s short story we are presented with three different parties: the Council’s, the Haskin’s, and Butler. Mr. and Mrs. Council are a “lower-middle class” family that works hard for their money and does all the farming themselves to keep up their land. The Haskin’s are a family from out of town that are just coming into town and looking for a new place to stay and make a new life out of. Finally, there is Butler; who is one of the wealthiest landowners in the town and rents a piece of his land to the Haskin’s. Mr. and Mrs. Haskins may be down on their luck, but were always grateful and diligent in order to take advantage of the things they were given throu...
In “Barn Burning”, Abner enters the house at dusk and “could smell the coffee from the room where they would presently eat the cold food remaining from the afternoon meal.” (14) A warm meal would indicate fulfillment and cohesiveness within the family. The inclusion of the detail that the food was cold represents an inversion of these associations. The cold meal symbolizes the family’s distaste with Abner’s actions. The memory of the dinner lingers with the family as they get ready for bed and appears linked with negative images of “Where they had been were no long, water-cloudy scoriations resembling the sporadic course of a lilliputian moving machine.” (15) In addition, the emphasis that this dinner was in fact a left-over meal symbolizes that the pattern of Abner’s destructive behavior and its effects on his family will not change.
In the two of the most revered pieces of American literature, “Barn Burning” by William Faulkner and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, we examined two characters and the relationships that they shared with their fathers. Being a father and having a father-like figure plays a monumental role in a child’s life. Although in these components of literature, the two main characters, Huckleberry Finn and Colonel Sartoris Snopes, show animosity towards their fathers. They both aspired to be the farthest type of person from their fathers. Huckleberry Finn didn’t want to be a drunk, ignorant, racist. Although at the beginning of the short story, Sarty backed his father and lied for him when accused of burning barns, but at the end of
Abner goes before a Justice to show that he is being wronged. While the Justice still finds him guilty he does lessen the fine. However, that is not enough for Abner. This prompts Abner into taking matters, once again into his own hands. His father calls for him to go to their barn and retrieve a can of oil. Sarty starts for the barn. Then he realizes that he was doing what he was told out of obligation. “Then he was moving, running, outside the house, toward the stable: this the old habit, the old blood which he had not been permitted to choose for himself.” (Faulkner 181) Although he is tormented by his choice he returns with the can. When Sarty realizes that Abner isn’t going to send warning, he feels Abner is breaking his own moral code. He then knows that he has to do the right thing, and warn de Spain. Abner knows that he wants to tell, so he wants him detained. Finally, able to break free he sets off to warn de Spain. After his warning, Sarty hears three shots fired. In a moment of guilt, he calls out to his father. “” Pap! Pap!”, running again before he knew he had begun to run, looking backward over his shoulder at the glare as he got up, running on among the invisible trees, panting, sobbing, “Father! Father!”” (Faulkner 183) The change from an endearment to something more formal, shows Sarty putting emotional distances between himself and his father.
At this point in the story the main characters, Abner (Ab) and his son, Colonel Sartoris Snopes (Sarty) are introduced. Ab is on trial for the malicious burning of a barn that was owned by a wealthy local farmer. For Sarty’s entire life, he and his family had been living in poverty. His father, who had always been jealous of “the good life”, took his frustrations out against the post-Civil War aristocracy by burning the barns of wealthy farmers. As most fathers do, Ab makes the attempt to pass his traits and beliefs on to his son, who does not necessarily agree nor fully understand his father’s standpoint.
The narrator’s father is being freed from slavery after the civil war, leads a quiet life. On his deathbed, the narrator’s grandfather is bitter and feels as a traitor to the blacks’ common goal. He advises the narrator’s father to undermine the white people and “agree’em to death and destruction (Ellison 21)” The old man deemed meekness to be treachery. The narrator’s father brings into the book element of emotional and moral ambiguity. Despite the old man’s warnings, the narrator believes that genuine obedience can win him respect and praise.
William Faulkner's three novels referred to as the Snopes Trilogy submerge the reader into the deepest, darkest realms of the human mind. The depth of these novels caused the immediate dismissal of any preconceived notions I had toward Faulkner and his writings. No longer did his novels seem to be simple stories describing the white trash, living in the artificial Yoknapatawpha County, of the deep South. The seemingly redneck, simple-minded characters of the Snopes family, when examined closely, reveal all the greed, guile, and brilliance in the human heart and mind. The means by which the Snopes family lives, the means by which it survives, causes the reader to contemplate the boundary between survival and stealing, between necessity and evil. Is it wrong for a greedy person to manipulate another greedy person, using his or her own greed against them? Can evil swallow itself up, consuming an evil person by means of another evil person? The Snopes Trilogy reveals the consuming effect of deceit combined with ambition and displays the genius of the human mind despite an outward disposition that seemingly denies any intelligence at all.
Normally in life, you look up to your father to be the care taker and to encourage you to make your own decisions on what is right and what is wrong. You figure your father should have your best interest at heart and to show compassion for you. In William Faulkner's short story "Barn Burning," Abner is the opposite of the normal father figure you would see. Rather than encouraging his son, Sarty, to make his own decisions on what is right and what is wrong, Abner wants Sarty to lie for him to protect his freedom, so Abner won’t get caught for burning barns. Abner forces fear into Sarty to make sure he will lie for him rather than tell the truth. The relationship between Abner and Sarty is struggling due to Abners abusiveness and criminal ways.
William Faulkner's "Barn Burning" provides an excellent example of how conflicting loyalties can affect decisions. In Faulkner's story, the main character, Sarty, faces such a dilemma. On one hand, Sarty has the morals that society has instilled in him in spite of his father. One the other hand, Sarty has the loyalty to his father because of the blood ties shared between them and the fact that his father raised and provided for him. Ultimately, it is these conflicting ideas that will lead to Sarty's final decision.
The small, grim town of Sleepy Hollow does not seem to welcome the company of an outsider. Only the Van Tassels seem to show any signs of relief in having someone to help solve the case of the recent murders. Baltus Van Tassel, a wealthy farmer, has grown to become the town’s council, banker, and landlord. He, along with a few colleagues, explains to Crane whom the real murderer is: the Headless Horseman. As history tells, the horseman was a brave warrior who fought his enemies by slashing off their heads. He was finally slain in the western woods of Sleepy Hollow, only to have his head cut off by his own sword. After twenty years buried in those woods, the spirit has awaken, cutting off heads wherever he may find them....
In “Barn Burning” the setting is a time when people drove horse wagons and the workingmen were generally farmers. The major character in this story is Colonel Sartoris Snopes, called “Sarty” by his family who is a ten-year-old boy. In the beginning, Sarty is portrayed as a confused and frightened young boy. He is in despair over the burden of doing the right thing or sticking by his family, as his father states,” You got to learn to stick to your own blood or you ain’t going to have any blood to stick to you.”
William Faulkner elected to write “Barn Burning” from his young character Sarty’s perspective because his sense of morality and decency would present a more plausible conflict in this story. Abner Snopes inability to feel the level of remorse needed to generate a truly moral predicament in this story, sheds light on Sarty’s efforts to overcome the constant “pull of blood”(277) that forces him to remain loyal to his father. As a result, this reveals the hidden contempt and fear Sarty has developed over the years because of Abner’s behavior. Sarty’s struggle to maintain an understanding of morality while clinging to the fading idolization of a father he fears, sets the tone for a chain of events that results in his liberation from Abner’s destructive defiance-but at a costly price.
Social class is a subjective concept in social sciences and political theory where individuals are grouped into different classes. This set a hierarchy inside the society structure where the upper and lower class exist and contribute to the society. Understanding social classes and their effects on the people, as well as cultures and social behavior and lead sociologist closer to the development of an ideal society.
In “Barn Burning,” Abner is described as stiff, wolf-like, and without heat because of his coldness and bitterness toward society in which he was part of during the time of the War Between the States. The main character is Abner Snopes who sharecrops to make a living for his family; in his story, Faulkner describes a typical relationship between wealthy people and poor people during that particular time.
It is perpetuated by the way wealth, power, and prestige are distributed and passed on from one generation to the next